Annals of Family Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Annals of Family Medicine 2:S88-S99 (2004)
© 2004 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
doi: 10.1370/afm.138

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow TRACK Discussion: Submit a Comment
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when TRACK Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Burke, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Burke, K.

Task Force Report 5. Report of the Task Force on Family Medicine’s Role in Shaping the Future Health Care Delivery System

Richard G. Roberts, MD, JD1, Pam S. Snape, MD2 and Kevin Burke3

1 Chair, Task Force Report 5, Madison, Wisc
2 Vice Chair, Task Force Report 5, Greenville, SC
3 Staff Executive, Task Force Report 5, Washington, DC

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Kevin Burke, 2021 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20036, kburke{at}aafp.org

BACKGROUND Recognizing that the implementation of needed changes within family medicine will be enhanced through a concurrent effort to transform the broader health care system, this Future of Family Medicine task force was charged with determining family medicine’s leadership role in shaping the future health care delivery system.

METHODS After reviewing the changes taking place within family medicine and the broader health care system, this task force identified 6 priorities for fostering necessary modifications in the health care system. In addressing the leadership challenge facing the discipline, the task force presents a 3-dimensional matrix that provides a useful framework for describing the audiences that should be targeted, the strategic priorities that should be pursued, and the specific recommendations that should be addressed. Noting that leadership is part of the heritage of family medicine, the task force reviewed past successes by the discipline as important lessons that can be instructive as family physicians begin advocating for needed changes.

MAJOR FINDINGS Effective leadership is an essential ingredient that will determine, to a large extent, the success of family medicine in advocating for needed change in the health care system overall and in the specialty. It is vitally important to groom leaders within family medicine and to create venues where policy makers and influence leaders can look beyond their usual constituencies and horizons to a comprehensive view of health care. A central concept being proposed is that of a relationship-centered personal medical home. This medical home serves as the focal point through which all individuals—regardless of age, gender, race, ethnicity, or socioeconomic status—receive a basket of acute, chronic, and preventive medical care services that are accessible, accountable, comprehensive, integrated, patient-centered, safe, scientifically valid, and satisfying to both patients and their physicians.

CONCLUSION Family medicine has and will continue to have an important leadership role in health system change. It has been most successful when it has been able to identify a high-priority goal through consensus within the discipline, to focus and coordinate local and national resources, and to use a multipronged approach in addressing the priority. Although the Future of Family Medicine project has provided an important impetus for the identification of key priorities across the discipline, for the FFM project ultimately to be a success, implementation steps will need to be identified and prioritized. The leadership matrix presented in this report can provide a useful structuring tool to identify, understand, and coordinate change efforts more effectively. Strategic alliances with primary care groups and others also will be critical to the success of change initiatives.

Key Words: Leadership • family medicine • public policy • politics • delivery of health care • reimbursement • insurance, health • health system agencies




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
G. Blake, A. Skelton, J. Borkan, S. Spann, T. Ideka, M. Worthington, and A. David
RESIDENCY EDUCATION--COMPETENCY AND INNOVATION
Ann. Fam. Med, September 1, 2008; 6(5): 473 - 474.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
K. P. Derose and N. Lurie
Reliving history and renewing the health care reform debate.
Ann. Fam. Med, September 1, 2006; 4(5): 388 - 390.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
H. K. Rabinowitz, J. A. Becker, N. D. Gregory, and R. C. Wender
NIH Funding in Family Medicine: An Analysis of 2003 Awards.
Ann. Fam. Med, September 1, 2006; 4(5): 437 - 442.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
S. J. Spann and for the members of Task Force 6 and The Executive
Report on Financing the New Model of Family Medicine
Ann. Fam. Med, November 1, 2004; 2(suppl_3): S1 - S21.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Annals of Family Medicine.