HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) TRACK Discussion: Submit a Comment Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when TRACK Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Svab, I. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Svab, I. Related Collections Health policy Research capacity building

Changing Research Culture

Igor vab, MD, PhD

Department of Family Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Igor vab, MD, PhD, Department of Family Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Poljanski nasip 58, SI 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia, igor.svab{at}mf.uni-lj.si

Although there is general agreement that family medicine has a lot to offer to the health care system, the academic dimension is still not widely understood. There are two main reasons why family medicine needs to develop its scientific potential: to address the true nature of the discipline, and to help in its recognition. The academic establishment benefits from academic family medicine by gaining new questions that are necessary to be answered and by gaining new research approaches.

Many problems are encountered when introducing family medicine into the academic arena. Two main strategies for developing family medicine research can be identified. The first is to adapt to the existing structure of the academic world by claiming equal rights with the developed disciplines, collaborating with other university departments in their research projects, publishing articles in established journals, and participating in established faculty development programs. The other, more demanding, strategy is to introduce changes to the academic arena by developing specific research questions, by collaborating on research within family medicine, and by developing family medicine’s own success criteria for academic excellence. The two approaches are not mutually exclusive.

The World Organization of Family Doctors plays an important role in supporting both approaches through its international affiliations and contacts with policy makers.

Key Words: Research • family practice • family medicine • world health • international agencies • international cooperation

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. L. Thomsen, D. Jarbol, and J. Sondergaard Excessive workload, uncertain career opportunities and lack of funding are important barriers to recruiting and retaining primary care medical researchers: a qualitative interview study Fam. Pract., October 1, 2006; 23(5): 545 - 549. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. van Weel and W. W. Rosser Improving Health Care Globally: A Critical Review of the Necessity of Family Medicine Research and Recommendations to Build Research Capacity Ann. Fam. Med, May 1, 2004; 2(suppl_2): S5 - S16. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]