| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md
2 Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore, Md
3 RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif
4 Department of Community Health and Human Development, University of California, Berkeley, Calif
5 Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, Calif
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Mary Catherine Beach, MD, MPH , Division of General Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, 2024 East Monument Street, Suite 2-500, Baltimore, MD 21287, mcbeach{at}jhmi.edu
PURPOSE Physicians’ values may be shifting under managed care, but there have been no empirical data to support this claim. We describe physician conceptions of responsibility to individual patients and distributive justice in health care, and explore whether these values are associated with type of managed care practice and professional satisfaction.
METHODS We mailed a questionnaire to 500 primary care physicians from 80 out-patient clinics in 11 managed care organizations (MCOs) who were participating in 4 studies designed to improve the quality of depression care in primary care.
RESULTS We received 414 responses (response rate 83%). Twenty-eight percent of physicians strongly agreed that their main responsibility was to the individual patient rather than to society (strong sense of responsibility to individual patients). Physicians with a strong sense of responsibility to individual patients were older (43% of physicians older than 50 years reported a strong sense of responsibility to individual patients, compared with 26% of physicians aged 36 to 50 years, and 21% of physicians younger than 35 years, P = .009) and tended to practice in network- rather than staff-model MCOs (33% of physicians in network-model MCOs reported a strong sense of responsibility to individual patients compared with 24% in staff-model MCOs, P = .077). Scores on a scale measuring egalitarian conceptions of distributive justice within the health care system were similar for physicians regardless of whether they reported a strong sense of responsibility to individual patients. When we controlled for physician and practice characteristics, physicians with a strong sense of responsibility to individual patients and physicians with higher scores on an egalitarian scale were more likely to be very satisfied overall with their practices (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.23, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11–4.49, and AOR = 1.18, 95% CI, 1.09–1.29, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS Physicians with a strong sense of responsibility to individual patients are older and less likely to practice in staff-model MCOs. Stronger commitment to an egalitarian health care system and a strong sense of responsibility to individual patients are independently associated with greater practice satisfaction among physicians. The impact of these values on patient care should be a priority for future research and the subject of professional education and debate.
Key Words: Professional practice • attitudes • personal satisfaction • ethics
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  T. S Maughan and J. Rule Ethics of PCT decision making on funding cancer treatments BMJ, August 11, 2008; 337(aug11_2): a1243 - a1243. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. C. Stange Stimulus, Response, Interpretation Ann. Fam. Med, March 1, 2005; 3(2): 177 - 179. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. C. Stange In This Issue Ann. Fam. Med, January 1, 2005; 3(1): 2 - 3. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
Read all TRACK Comments
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
