Annals of Family Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Annals of Family Medicine 3:507-513 (2005)
© 2005 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
doi: 10.1370/afm.370

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental data: Appendix
Right arrow In Brief
Right arrow TRACK Comments: Submit a response
Right arrow TRACK Comments: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when TRACK Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alper, B. S.
Right arrow Articles by Ge, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alper, B. S.
Right arrow Articles by Ge, B.

Physicians Answer More Clinical Questions and Change Clinical Decisions More Often With Synthesized Evidence: A Randomized Trial in Primary Care

Brian S. Alper, MD, MSPH1,2, David S. White, MD3 and Bin Ge, MA4

1 DynaMed, Columbia, Mo
2 Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri-Columbia School of Medicine, Columbia, Mo
3 A private practice, Columbia, Mo
4 Medical Research Office, University of Missouri-Columbia Health Sciences Center, Columbia, Mo

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Brian S. Alper, MD, MSPH, Clinical Reference Products, EBSCO Publishing, Inc, 10 Estes ST, Ipswich, MA 01938, editor{at}dynamicmedical.com

PURPOSE Clinicians need evidence in a format that rapidly answers their questions. DynaMed is a database of synthesized evidence. We investigated whether primary care clinicians would answer more clinical questions, change clinical decision making, and alter search time using DynaMed in addition to their usual information sources.

METHODS Fifty-two primary care clinicians naïve to DynaMed searched for answers to 698 of their own clinical questions using the Internet. On a per-question basis, participants were randomized to have access to DynaMed (A) or not (N) in addition to their usual information sources. Outcomes included proportions of questions answered, proportions of questions with answers that changed clinical decision making, and median search times. The statistical approach of per-participant analyses of clinicians who asked questions in both A and N states was decided before data collection.

RESULTS Among 46 clinicians in per-participant analyses, 23 (50%) answered a greater proportion of questions during A than N, and 13 (28.3%) answered more questions during N than A (P = .05). Finding answers that changed clinical decision making occurred more often during A (25 clinicians, 54.3%) than during N (13 clinicians, 28.3%) (P = .01). Search times did not differ significantly. Overall, participants found answers for 263 (75.8%) of 347 A questions and 250 (71.2%) of 351 N questions. Answers changed clinical decision making for 224 (64.6%) of the A questions and 209 (59.5%) of the N questions.

CONCLUSIONS Using DynaMed, primary care clinicians answered more questions and changed clinical decisions more often, without increasing overall search time. Synthesizing results of systematic evidence surveillance is a feasible method for meeting clinical information needs in primary care.

Key Words: Evidence-based medicine • answering clinical questions • databases • systematic literature surveillance • clinical reference • medical decision making • medical informatics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
C. A. Sneiderman, D. Demner-Fushman, M. Fiszman, N. C. Ide, and T. C. Rindflesch
Knowledge-based Methods to Help Clinicians Find Answers in MEDLINE
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., November 1, 2007; 14(6): 772 - 780.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
S. E. Hauser, D. Demner-Fushman, J. L. Jacobs, S. M. Humphrey, G. Ford, and G. R. Thoma
Using Wireless Handheld Computers to Seek Information at the Point of Care: An Evaluation by Clinicians
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., November 1, 2007; 14(6): 807 - 815.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
A. I. Gonzalez-Gonzalez, M. Dawes, J. Sanchez-Mateos, R. Riesgo-Fuertes, E. Escortell-Mayor, T. Sanz-Cuesta, and T. Hernandez-Fernandez
Information Needs and Information-Seeking Behavior of Primary Care Physicians
Ann. Fam. Med, July 1, 2007; 5(4): 345 - 352.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
J. W. Ely, J. A. Osheroff, S. M. Maviglia, and M. E. Rosenbaum
Patient-Care Questions that Physicians Are Unable to Answer
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., July 1, 2007; 14(4): 407 - 414.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
N. C. Ide, R. F. Loane, and D. Demner-Fushman
Essie: A Concept-based Search Engine for Structured Biomedical Text
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., May 1, 2007; 14(3): 253 - 263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
K. C. Stange
In This Issue: Trade-Offs, Time Use, Depression Care
Ann. Fam. Med, November 1, 2005; 3(6): 482 - 483.
[Full Text] [PDF]

TRACK Comments:

Read all TRACK Comments

A landmark trial despite the lack of objective outcomes
Pierre Pluye
Annals of Family Medicine, 7 Dec 2005 [Full text]
The outcomes when clinicians use online evidence systems
Johanna I Westbrook, et al.
Annals of Family Medicine, 13 Dec 2005 [Full text]
Take Five
Richard O. Schamp
Annals of Family Medicine, 17 Dec 2005 [Full text]
Take two and e-mail me in the morning
Brian S. Alper
Annals of Family Medicine, 20 Dec 2005 [Full text]
Are Hunting Tools Enough for Point-of-Care Learning?
Scott Strayer, et al.
Annals of Family Medicine, 3 Jan 2006 [Full text]



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the Annals of Family Medicine.