| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich
2 Department of Family Practice, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Mich
3 PBRN Resource Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Ind
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Lee A. Green, MD, MPH, 1018 Fuller St, Campus Box 0708, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, greenla{at}umich.edu
BACKGROUND The practice-based research network (PBRN) is the basic laboratory for primary care research. Although most PBRNs include some common elements, their infrastructures vary widely. We offer suggestions for developing and supporting infrastructures to enhance PBRN research success.
METHODS Information was compiled based on published articles, the PBRN Resource Center survey of 2003, our PBRN experiences, and discussions with directors and coordinators from other PBRNs.
RESULTS PBRN research ranges from observational studies, through intervention studies, clinical trials, and quality of care research, to large-scale practice change interventions. Basic infrastructure elements such as a membership roster, a board, a director, a coordinator, a news-sharing function, a means of addressing requirements of institutional review boards and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, and a network meeting must exist to support these initiatives. Desirable elements such as support staff, electronic medical records, multiuser databases, mentoring and development programs, mock study sections, and research training are costly and difficult to sustain through project grant funds. These infrastructure elements must be selected, configured, and sized according to the PBRN’s self-defined research mission. Annual infrastructure costs are estimated to range from $69,700 for a basic network to $287,600 for a moderately complex network.
CONCLUSIONS Well-designed and properly supported PBRN infrastructures can support a wide range of research of great direct value to patients and society. Increased and more consistent infrastructure support could generate an explosion of pragmatic, generalizable knowledge about currently understudied populations, settings, and health care problems.
Key Words: Primary health care • research support • community networks • program development • information management
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  R. J. Dolor, P. C. Smith, and A. V. Neale Institutional Review Board Training for Community Practices: Advice from the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality Practice-Based Research Network Listserv J Am Board Fam Med, July 1, 2008; 21(4): 345 - 352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. H. Gilbert, O. D. Williams, D. B. Rindal, D. J. Pihlstrom, P. L. Benjamin, M. C. Wallace, and for the DPBRN Collaborative Group The Creation and Development of the Dental Practice-Based Research Network J Am Dent Assoc, January 1, 2008; 139(1): 74 - 81. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. M. Dickerson, C. Kraus, G. M. Kuo, C. A. Weber, O. V. Bazaldua, J. M. Tovar, A. L. Hume, T. J. Ives, J. G. Gums, and B. L. Carter Formation of a primary care pharmacist practice-based research network Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., October 1, 2007; 64(19): 2044 - 2049. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. L. Schwenk and L. A. Green The Michigan Clinical Research Collaboratory: Following the NIH Roadmap to the Community Ann. Fam. Med, September 1, 2006; 4(suppl_1): S49 - S54. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Lanier Primary Care Practice-Based Research Comes of Age in the United States Ann. Fam. Med, May 1, 2005; 3(suppl_1): S2 - S4. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
