| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
HealthPartners Research Foundation, Minneapolis, Minn
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Leif I. Solberg, MD, HealthPartners Research Foundation, PO Box 1524, MS#21111R, Minneapolis MN 55440-1524, leif.i.solberg{at}healthpartners.com
PURPOSE We wanted to determine whether a major improvement in access to primary care during 2000 was associated with changes in the quality of care for patients with depression.
METHODS Health plan administrative data were analyzed by multilevel regression to compare the quality of care received by patients with depression between 1999 and 2001, a time without major changes in depression care guidelines. Approximately 6,000 patients with depression who received all care in a large multispecialty medical group during any single year were subjects for this study. Thirteen different quality measures assessed process quality under the dimensions of effectiveness, timeliness, safety, and patient-centeredness.
RESULTS The largest change was a reduction in the proportion of depressed patients with no follow-up visit in primary care after starting a new antidepressant medication: from 33.0% before a change in access to care to 15.4% afterward, P =.001. During the same period, continuity of care in primary care improved (>50% of primary care visits to 1 doctor increased from 67.3% to 74.0%, P = <.001), as did persistence of 6-month antidepressant medication (from 46.2% to 50.8%, P = <.001). Further analyses found that the latter change was primarily associated with the change in continuity of care. Measures of subspecialty mental health care worsened during this time.
CONCLUSION Marked improvement in access to primary care for 1 year was associated with some improvement in primary care for patients with depression, but the mechanism appeared to be improved continuity. Those planning to implement advanced access to care need to do so in such a way that continuity of care is enhanced rather than harmed by the change.
Key Words: Continuity of patient care • depression • primary health care/organization & administration • quality of health care • health services accessibility
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. Mehrotra, L. Keehl-Markowitz, and J. Z. Ayanian Implementing Open-Access Scheduling of Visits in Primary Care Practices: A Cautionary Tale Ann Intern Med, June 17, 2008; 148(12): 915 - 922. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. W. Mercer and G. C. M. Watt The Inverse Care Law: Clinical Primary Care Encounters in Deprived and Affluent Areas of Scotland Ann. Fam. Med, November 1, 2007; 5(6): 503 - 510. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. V Watts, B. Shiner, A. Pomerantz, P. Stender, and W. B Weeks Outcomes of a quality improvement project integrating mental health into primary care Qual. Saf. Health Care, October 1, 2007; 16(5): 378 - 381. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. I. Solberg Improving Medical Practice: A Conceptual Framework Ann. Fam. Med, May 1, 2007; 5(3): 251 - 256. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. C. Stange 'Another Compelling Idealized Model That Is Drastically Altered by the Ugly Facts on the Ground' Ann. Fam. Med, March 1, 2006; 4(2): 177 - 178. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. C. Stange In This Issue: Diabetes Quality of Care Ann. Fam. Med, January 1, 2006; 4(1): 2 - 3. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
Read all TRACK Comments
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
