HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) In Brief TRACK Discussion: Submit a Comment TRACK Discussion: View Comments Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when TRACK Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Fortin, M. Articles by Lapointe, L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Fortin, M. Articles by Lapointe, L.

Randomized Controlled Trials: Do They Have External Validity for Patients With Multiple Comorbidities?

Department of Family Medicine, Sherbrooke University, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Martin Fortin, MD, MSc, CMFC Unité de médecine de famille 305 St-Vallier Chicoutimi PQ G7H 5H6 martin.fortin{at}usherbrooke.ca

PURPOSE Many randomized controlled trials (RCTs) exclude patients who have multiple comorbidities. The aim of this study was to illustrate the prevalence of comorbidities among patients followed up in primary care who would have met the inclusion criteria of selected RCTs focusing on treatment of a particular condition. We used hypertension as an example of a particular chronic condition.

METHODS We used an existing database of 980 patients (660 women) that was representative of a population consulting primary care family doctors and that contained information about all chronic conditions. We randomly selected 5 RCTs that focused on patients with hypertension. The inclusion and exclusion criteria used in each of the 5 RCTs were applied (1 study at a time) to the patients in our database. The patients from our data set who met the inclusion criteria of a given RCT were considered eligible for that RCT.

RESULTS Of the patients from our data set who were eligible for each of the RCTs, 89% to 100% had multiple chronic conditions. The mean number of chronic conditions of patients eligible for each RCT ranged from 5.5 ± 3.3 to 11.7 ± 5.3.

CONCLUSIONS Results from this study suggest that RCTs targeting a chronic medical condition such as hypertension could find that, in a sample taken from family practice, most eligible patients have comorbid conditions. Whether these patients are sampled or excluded should be reported. Research results intended to be applied in medical practice should take the complex reality of effective treatment of these patients into consideration.

Key Words: Randomized controlled trials • comorbidity • primary care • hypertension

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. H. Halanych, M. M. Safford, W. C. Keys, S. D. Person, J. M. Shikany, Y.-I. Kim, R. M. Centor, and J. J. Allison Burden of Comorbid Medical Conditions and Quality of Diabetes Care Diabetes Care, December 1, 2007; 30(12): 2999 - 3004. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Fortin, H. Soubhi, C. Hudon, E. A Bayliss, and M. v. d. Akker Multimorbidity's many challenges BMJ, May 19, 2007; 334(7602): 1016 - 1017. [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Rust and L. A. Cooper How Can Practice-based Research Contribute to the Elimination of Health Disparities? J Am Board Fam Med, March 1, 2007; 20(2): 105 - 114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. C. Stange On TRACK: Medical Research Must Consider Context and Complexity Ann. Fam. Med, July 1, 2006; 4(4): 369 - 370. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. C. Stange In This Issue: Glimpses of a Transformed Model of Care Ann. Fam. Med, March 1, 2006; 4(2): 98 - 100. [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Starfield Threads and Yarns: Weaving the Tapestry of Comorbidity Ann. Fam. Med, March 1, 2006; 4(2): 101 - 103. [Full Text] [PDF]

TRACK Comments: