|
|
||||||||
Essay |
1 Departments of Family and Community Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM
2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Penn
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Lawrence M. Leeman, MD, Department of Family and Community Medicine, 2400 Tucker NE, 3rd Floor, Albuquerque, NM 87106, lleeman{at}salud.unm.edu
ABSTRACT
Patient-choice cesarean delivery is increasing in the United States. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists supports this option, citing ethical premises of autonomy and informed consent, despite a lack of evidence for its safety. This increase in patient-choice cesarean delivery occurs during a time when women with a breech-presenting fetus or a previous cesarean section have fewer choices as to vaginal birth. Patient-choice cesarean delivery may become widely disseminated before the potential risks to women and their children have been well analyzed. The growing pressure for cesarean delivery in the absence of a medical indication may ultimately result in a decrease of womens childbirth options. Advocacy of patient-choice requires preserving vaginal birth options as well as cesarean delivery.
Key Words: Cesarean section surgical procedures, elective patient choice vaginal birth after cesarean breech presentation pregnancy childbirth
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. C. Stange On TRACK: Medical Research Must Consider Context and Complexity Ann. Fam. Med, July 1, 2006; 4(4): 369 - 370. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. C. Stange and L. S. Acheson In This Issue: Communication in the Era of 'Personalized' Medicine Ann. Fam. Med, May 1, 2006; 4(3): 194 - 196. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
Read all TRACK Comments
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |