| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 Capital Area Primary Care Research Network (CAPRICORN), Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
2 The Robert Graham Center Policy Studies in Family Medicine and Primary Care, Washington, DC
3 Center for Child Health Research, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, NY
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: David Meyers, MD, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 540 Gaither Rd, Rockville, MD 20850, dmeyers{at}ahrq.gov
PURPOSE Americans who do not have health insurance receive fewer health services and have poorer health status than those who have insurance. To better understand this disparity, in this study we characterize primary care physician’s perceptions of what effect, if any, patients’ insurance status has on their clinical decision making during office visits.
METHODS Twenty-five physician members of CAPRICORN, a primary care practice-based research network in metropolitan Washington, DC, completed a brief paper-card survey instrument immediately after each patient encounter during 2 half-day office sessions. Participants saw patients in their usual manner and were given no additional information about their patients or their insurance.
RESULTS Eighty-eight percent of participating physicians reported making at least 1 change in clinical management as a result of a patient’s insurance status. They reported altering their management during 99 of 409 patient encounters (24.2%). There was a significant difference in the percentage of visits that involved a change in management for privately insured, publicly insured, and uninsured patients (18.7%, 29.5%, and 43.5% respectively, P = .01). Physicians reported discussing insurance issues with patients during 62.6% of visits during which they made a change in management based on insurance status.
CONCLUSION Physicians incorporate their patients’ insurance status into their clinical decision making and acknowledge they frequently alter their clinical management as a result. Additional research is needed to understand the effect of these changes on patient health and to assist both physicians and patients in enhancing the quality of care delivered within the constraints of the current insurance system.
Key Words: Health insurance • decision making • primary health care • practice-based research network
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  K. C. Stange In This Issue: Mental Health and Care Management, Health Behavior Change, and Reflection in Primary Care Ann. Fam. Med, January 1, 2008; 6(1): 2 - 3. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. E. DeVoe, A. Baez, H. Angier, L. Krois, C. Edlund, and P. A. Carney Insurance + Access != Health Care: Typology of Barriers to Health Care Access for Low-Income Families Ann. Fam. Med, November 1, 2007; 5(6): 511 - 518. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. C. Stange On TRACK: Challenges and Insights Ann. Fam. Med, November 1, 2006; 4(6): 561 - 563. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. C. Stange In This Issue: Capacity for Caring and Generating New Knowledge Ann. Fam. Med, September 1, 2006; 4(5): 386 - 388. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. P. Derose and N. Lurie Reliving history and renewing the health care reform debate. Ann. Fam. Med, September 1, 2006; 4(5): 388 - 390. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
Read all TRACK Comments
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
