HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) In Brief TRACK Discussion: Submit a Comment TRACK Discussion: View Comments Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when TRACK Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rodríguez, M. A. Articles by Mangione, C. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rodríguez, M. A. Articles by Mangione, C. M. Related Collections Older adults Qualitative methods Health policy Professional practice Relationship

Mandatory Reporting of Elder Abuse: Between a Rock and a Hard Place

University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Michael A. Rodríguez, MD, MPH, UCLA Department of Family Medicine 10880, Wilshire Blvd, Suite 1800 Los Angeles, CA 90024, MRodriguez{at}mednet.ucla.edu

PURPOSE Despite mandated reporting laws that require physicians to report elder abuse, physicians have low rates of reporting. The purpose of this study was to identify physician’s perspectives on mandated reporting of elder abuse.

METHODS Individual, semistructured interviews were conducted with 20 primary care physicians practicing in a variety of settings and caring for a diverse patient population in the Los Angeles area. Interviewers collected information on physicians’ perspectives about factors that may influence physicians’ likelihood to report elder abuse. The interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were analyzed using a grounded theory approach based on the constant comparative method and the emergence of the core category of paradox to best account for the most problematic elder abuse situations faced by physicians.

RESULTS During the interviews 3 paradoxes were expressed by physicians about the mandatory reporting of elder abuse. Specifically, mandatory reporting was related to both perceptions of increases and decreases in physician-patient rapport, patient quality of life, and physician control or ability to decide what is in the best interest of the patient. These paradoxes appear to be primarily hidden or unconscious, yet they influence the conscious decision process of whether to report.

CONCLUSIONS Primary care physicians appear to be subject to paradoxes of reporting that contribute to the underreporting of elder abuse. These paradoxes and alternative modes of managing paradoxes are important and should be addressed in educational and training programs for physicians, and systematic evaluation of these issues may help to inform future legislation in this area. Further studies are needed to assess the generalizability of these findings to other groups of clinicians.

Key Words: Elder abuse • health care • reporting • qualitative • health care delivery • health services research

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. M. Strasser and T. Fulmer The Clinical Presentation of Elder Neglect: What We Know and What We Can Do Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, January 1, 2007; 12(6): 340 - 349. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. C. Stange On TRACK: Challenges and Insights Ann. Fam. Med, November 1, 2006; 4(6): 561 - 563. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. C. Stange In This Issue: Capacity for Caring and Generating New Knowledge Ann. Fam. Med, September 1, 2006; 4(5): 386 - 388. [Full Text] [PDF]

TRACK Comments: