| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 Division of Community Health Sciences (General Practice Section), University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
2 Centre for Health Services Research, University of Newcastle, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Karen Fairhurst, PhD, Division of Community Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, 20 West Richmond Street, Edinburgh, UK, EH8 9DX, Karen.Fairhurst{at}ed.ac.uk
PURPOSE We sought to explore general practitioners’ satisfaction with their patient visits and the congruity between this satisfaction and new models of practice, such as those implicit in the new general medical services contract in the United Kingdom.
METHODS We undertook a qualitative study using audio recordings of patient visits and in-depth interviews with 19 general practitioners in Lothian, Scotland.
RESULTS Doctors’ reports of satisfying and unsatisfying experiences during consultations were primarily concerned with developing and maintaining relationships rather than with the technical aspects of diagnosis and treatment. In their most satisfying consultations, they used the interpersonal aspects of care, in particular their sense of knowing the patient, to effect a successful outcome. Success was seen in holistic terms—not as the prevention, treatment, or cure of a disease, but as restorative of the person. Positive experiences were implicated in maintaining their identity as "good" doctors. Negative experiences sometimes challenged this identity, and doctors resisted this challenge by finding explanations for unsatisfactory experiences that distanced themselves from their source or cause.
CONCLUSION The attributes of a satisfying encounter found in this study derive from a model of practice that prioritizes the distress of patients, which cannot be measured, above the technical and quantifiable in diagnosis and treatment. Preoccupation with that which is technical and measurable in health care system reforms risks defining a model of practice with purpose and meaning not congruent with doctors’ experiences of their work and may result in further destruction of professional morale.
Key Words: General practice • family practice • physicians, family • physician-patient relations • satisfaction • morale • professional practice
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  W.G. Elder, C. Hustedde, D. Rakel, and J. Joyce CAM Curriculum Activities to Enhance Professionalism Training in Medical Schools Complementary Health Practice Review, April 1, 2008; 13(2): 127 - 133. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Kjeldmand and I. Holmstrom Balint Groups as a Means to Increase Job Satisfaction and Prevent Burnout Among General Practitioners Ann. Fam. Med, March 1, 2008; 6(2): 138 - 145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Kennedy, A. Rogers, and P. Bower Support for self care for patients with chronic disease BMJ, November 10, 2007; 335(7627): 968 - 970. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. C. Stange On TRACK: The Search for the Holy Grail Ann. Fam. Med, January 1, 2007; 5(1): 84 - 85. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. C. Stange In This Issue: Prescribing Drugs: What Do Patients and Pharmaceutical Companies Really Want? Ann. Fam. Med, November 1, 2006; 4(6): 482 - 483. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
Read all TRACK Comments
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
