Annals of Family Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Annals of Family Medicine 5:196-201 (2007)
© 2007 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
doi: 10.1370/afm.679
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow In Brief
Right arrow TRACK Discussion: Submit a Comment
Right arrow TRACK Discussion: View Comments
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when TRACK Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Parchman, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Bowers, K. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Parchman, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Bowers, K. W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Chronic illness
Right arrow Quantitative methods
Right arrow Health services
Right arrow Professional practice

Competing Demands or Clinical Inertia: The Case of Elevated Glycosylated Hemoglobin

Michael L. Parchman, MD, MPH1,2, Jacqueline A. Pugh, MD1,3, Raquel L. Romero, MD1,2 and Krista W. Bowers, MD3

1 VERDICT Health Services Research Center, South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, Tex
2 Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center-San Antonio, San Antonio, Tex
3 Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center-San Antonio, San Antonio, Tex

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Michael L. Parchman, MD, MPH, South Texas Veterans Health Care System, VERDICT 11C6, 7400 Merton Minter Blvd, San Antonio, TX 78229-4404, parchman{at}uthscsa.edu

PURPOSE This study aimed to examine the contribution of competing demands to changes in hypoglycemic medications and to return appointment intervals for patients with type 2 diabetes and an elevated glycosylated hemoglobin (A1c) level.

METHODS We observed 211 primary care encounters by adult patients with type 2 diabetes in 20 primary care clinics and documented changes in hypoglycemic medications. Competing demands were assessed from length of encounter, number of concerns patients raised, and number of topics brought up by the clinician. Days to the next scheduled appointment were obtained at patient checkout. Recent A1c values and dates were determined from the chart.

RESULTS Among patients with an A1c level greater than 7%, each additional patient concern was associated with a 49% (95% confidence interval, 35%–60%) reduction in the likelihood of a change in medication, independent of length of the encounter and most recent level of A1c. Among patients with an A1c level greater than 7% and no change in medication, for every additional minute of encounter length, the time to the next scheduled appointment decreased by 2.8 days (P = .001). Similarly, for each additional 1% increase in A1c level, the time to the next scheduled appointment decreased by 8.6 days (P=.001).

CONCLUSIONS The concept of clinical inertia is limited and does not fully characterize the complexity of primary care encounters. Competing demands is a principle for constructing models of primary care encounters that are more congruent with reality and should be considered in the design of interventions to improve chronic disease outcomes in primary care settings.

Key Words: Diabetes mellitus, type 2 • hemoglobin A, glycosylated • ambulatory care • primary care • health care delivery • health services research • quality of care • practice-based research networks • office visits




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Psychosom. Med.Home page
W. Katon, J. Russo, E. H. B. Lin, S. R. Heckbert, A. J. Karter, L. H. Williams, P. Ciechanowski, E. Ludman, and M. Von Korff
Diabetes and Poor Disease Control: Is Comorbid Depression Associated With Poor Medication Adherence or Lack of Treatment Intensification?
Psychosom Med, November 1, 2009; 71(9): 965 - 972.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JAMAHome page
C. C. Keirns and S. D. Goold
Patient-Centered Care and Preference-Sensitive Decision Making
JAMA, October 28, 2009; 302(16): 1805 - 1806.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Am Board Fam MedHome page
R. W. Grant, K. E. Lutfey, E. Gerstenberger, C. L. Link, L. D. Marceau, and J. B. McKinlay
The Decision to Intensify Therapy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Results from an Experiment Using a Clinical Case Vignette
J Am Board Fam Med, September 1, 2009; 22(5): 513 - 520.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 The Diabetes EducatorHome page
A. A. Kaissi and M. Parchman
Organizational Factors Associated With Self-management Behaviors in Diabetes Primary Care Clinics
The Diabetes Educator, September 1, 2009; 35(5): 843 - 850.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Circ Cardiovasc Qual OutcomesHome page
A. J. Rose, D. R. Berlowitz, M. Manze, M. B. Orner, and N. R. Kressin
Comparing Methods of Measuring Treatment Intensification in Hypertension Care
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, July 1, 2009; 2(4): 385 - 391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Diabetes CareHome page
S. D. Bolen, E. Bricker, T. A. Samuels, H.-C. Yeh, S. S. Marinopoulos, M. McGuire, M. Abuid, and F. L. Brancati
Factors Associated With Intensification of Oral Diabetes Medications in Primary Care Provider-Patient Dyads: A Cohort Study
Diabetes Care, January 1, 2009; 32(1): 25 - 31.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Am Board Fam MedHome page
M. L. Parchman
The Gordian Knot of Chronic Illness Care
J Am Board Fam Med, November 1, 2008; 21(6): 487 - 489.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Intern MedHome page
K. Fiscella and R. M. Epstein
So Much to Do, So Little Time: Care for the Socially Disadvantaged and the 15-Minute Visit
Arch Intern Med, September 22, 2008; 168(17): 1843 - 1852.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Am Board Fam MedHome page
T. C. Rosenthal
The Medical Home: Growing Evidence to Support a New Approach to Primary Care
J Am Board Fam Med, September 1, 2008; 21(5): 427 - 440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Fam PractHome page
E. A Bayliss, A. E Edwards, J. F Steiner, and D. S Main
Processes of care desired by elderly patients with multimorbidities
Fam. Pract., August 1, 2008; 25(4): 287 - 293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ANN INTERN MEDHome page
E. A. Kerr, B. J. Zikmund-Fisher, M. L. Klamerus, U. Subramanian, M. M. Hogan, and T. P. Hofer
The Role of Clinical Uncertainty in Treatment Decisions for Diabetic Patients with Uncontrolled Blood Pressure
Ann Intern Med, May 20, 2008; 148(10): 717 - 727.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ANN INTERN MEDHome page
L. S. Phillips and J. G. Twombly
It's Time to Overcome Clinical Inertia
Ann Intern Med, May 20, 2008; 148(10): 783 - 785.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. DiabetesHome page
A. M. Davis, D. R. Sawyer, and L. M. Vinci
The Potential of Group Visits in Diabetes Care
Clin. Diabetes, April 1, 2008; 26(2): 58 - 62.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JAMAHome page
T. Bodenheimer
A 63-Year-Old Man With Multiple Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Poor Adherence to Treatment Plans
JAMA, November 7, 2007; 298(17): 2048 - 2055.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann Fam MedHome page
K. C. Stange
Is 'Clinical Inertia' Blaming Without Understanding? Are Competing Demands Excuses?
Ann. Fam. Med, July 1, 2007; 5(4): 371 - 374.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann Fam MedHome page
K. C. Stange
In This Issue: New Concepts for Diabetes and Chronic Disease Management
Ann. Fam. Med, May 1, 2007; 5(3): 194 - 195.
[Full Text] [PDF]

TRACK Comments:

Read all TRACK Comments

Responding only to patient complaints IS clinical inertia
Lawrence Phillips
Annals of Family Medicine, 5 Jun 2007 [Full text]
Clinical Inertia, Competing Demands, and Hypertension
Randell K. Wexler MD, MPH, FAAFP
Annals of Family Medicine, 8 Jun 2007 [Full text]
Inertia, Distractions, and this is bad? Nope, opposite...
Joshua D. Steinberg (MD)
Annals of Family Medicine, 8 Jun 2007 [Full text]
Re: Responding only to patient complaints IS clinical inertia
Joshua D. Steinberg (MD)
Annals of Family Medicine, 8 Jun 2007 [Full text]
Re: Re: Responding only to patient complaints IS clinical inertia
Lawrence S Phillips
Annals of Family Medicine, 9 Jun 2007 [Full text]
Competing demands vs. clinical inertia : a question of perspective
Martin Fortin
Annals of Family Medicine, 10 Jun 2007 [Full text]
The parallel process of competing demands
Elizabeth A. Bayliss
Annals of Family Medicine, 10 Jun 2007 [Full text]
Clinical Inertia Or Competing Demands?
Stephen J. Spann, M.D., M.B.A.
Annals of Family Medicine, 11 Jun 2007 [Full text]
Author's Response to Dr. Phillips
Michael L. Parchman, et al.
Annals of Family Medicine, 11 Jun 2007 [Full text]
It IS provider behavior
Lawrence Phillips
Annals of Family Medicine, 13 Jun 2007 [Full text]
A Care Evaluation Tool Must Consider Competing Demands
Terry L. Hankey, M.D.
Annals of Family Medicine, 18 Jun 2007 [Full text]
f/u questions
Paul C Hicks
Annals of Family Medicine, 21 Jun 2007 [Full text]
Treat the Patient---NOT the Checkmark
Terry L. Hankey, M.D.
Annals of Family Medicine, 22 Jun 2007 [Full text]
Response to Dr. Hicks
Michael L. Parchman
Annals of Family Medicine, 24 Jun 2007 [Full text]
Re: Response to Dr. Hicks
Lawrence S Phillips
Annals of Family Medicine, 25 Jun 2007 [Full text]
Response to Dr. Phillips regarding Agenda Items on the Table
Michael L. Parchman
Annals of Family Medicine, 29 Jun 2007 [Full text]
Focus on the priorities
Lawrence Phillips
Annals of Family Medicine, 30 Jun 2007 [Full text]

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the Annals of Family Medicine.