Annals of Family Medicine Annals Impact Factor is 4.5
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Annals of Family Medicine 5:209-215 (2007)
© 2007 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
doi: 10.1370/afm.696
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow In Brief
Right arrow TRACK Comments: Submit a response
Right arrow TRACK Comments: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when TRACK Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crosson, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Crabtree, B. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Crosson, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Crabtree, B. F.

Electronic Medical Records and Diabetes Quality of Care: Results From a Sample of Family Medicine Practices

Jesse C. Crosson, PhD1,3, Pamela A. Ohman-Strickland, PhD2,3, Karissa A. Hahn, MPH3, Barbara DiCicco-Bloom, RN, PhD3, Eric Shaw, PhD3, A. John Orzano, MD3,4 and Benjamin F. Crabtree, PhD3,4,5

1 Department of Family Medicine, UMDNJ-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ
2 Department of Biostatistics, UMDNJ-School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ
3 Research Division, Department of Family Medicine, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Somerset, NJ
4 Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ
5 Center for Research in Family Practice and Primary Care, Cleveland, Ohio

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Jesse C. Crosson, PhD, Department of Family Medicine, UMDNJ-New Jersey Medical School, MSB B-648, 185 South Orange Ave, Newark, NJ 07103, jesse.crosson{at}umdnj.edu

PURPOSE Care of patients with diabetes requires management of complex clinical information, which may be improved by the use of an electronic medical record (EMR); however, the actual relationship between EMR usage and diabetes care quality in primary care settings is not well understood. We assessed the relationship between EMR usage and diabetes care quality in a sample of family medicine practices.

METHODS We conducted cross-sectional analyses of baseline data from 50 practices participating in a practice improvement study. Between April 2003 and December 2004 chart auditors reviewed a random sample of medical records from patients with diabetes in each practice for adherence to guidelines for diabetes processes of care, treatment, and achievement of intermediate outcomes. Practice leaders provided medical record system information. We conducted multivariate analyses of the relationship between EMR usage and diabetes care adjusting for potential practice- and patient-level confounders and practice-level clustering.

RESULTS Diabetes care quality in all practices showed room for improvement; however, after adjustment, patient care in the 37 practices not using an EMR was more likely to meet guidelines for process (odds ratio [OR], 2.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.42–3.57) treatment (OR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.07–2.60), and intermediate outcomes (OR, 2.68; 95% CI, 1.49–4.82) than in the 13 practices using an EMR.

CONCLUSIONS The use of an EMR in primary care practices is insufficient for insuring high-quality diabetes care. Efforts to expand EMR use should focus not only on improving technology but also on developing methods for implementing and integrating this technology into practice reality.

Key Words: Medical record system/computerized • diabetes mellitus • quality of health care • primary health care • electronic medical records




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Ann Fam MedHome page
K. A. Hahn, J. M. Ferrante, J. C. Crosson, S. V. Hudson, and B. F. Crabtree
Diabetes Flow Sheet Use Associated With Guideline Adherence
Ann. Fam. Med, May 1, 2008; 6(3): 235 - 238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann Fam MedHome page
K. C. Stange
'You Complete Me'
Ann. Fam. Med, September 1, 2007; 5(5): 462 - 463.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 DOC NewsHome page
Electronic Medical Records Don't Guarantee Improved Care
DOC News, August 1, 2007; 4(8): 10 - 10.
[Full Text]

Home page
 Ann Fam MedHome page
K. C. Stange
Is 'Clinical Inertia' Blaming Without Understanding? Are Competing Demands Excuses?
Ann. Fam. Med, July 1, 2007; 5(4): 371 - 374.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann Fam MedHome page
K. C. Stange
In This Issue: New Concepts for Diabetes and Chronic Disease Management
Ann. Fam. Med, May 1, 2007; 5(3): 194 - 195.
[Full Text] [PDF]

TRACK Comments:

Read all TRACK Comments

EHR's in the "Real World"
Dale A. Patterson, MD, FAAFP
Annals of Family Medicine, 5 Jun 2007 [Full text]
EHR bad for quality? Not the author's conclusion.
Susan T Andrews
Annals of Family Medicine, 8 Jun 2007 [Full text]
EMR and Information Systems In Support of Chronic Care
Steven A. Smith
Annals of Family Medicine, 10 Jun 2007 [Full text]
Electronic Health Records: Potential and Practice
Basit I Chaudhry
Annals of Family Medicine, 20 Jun 2007 [Full text]
HIT Done Right Improves Care
James E. Lett, et al.
Annals of Family Medicine, 29 Jun 2007 [Full text]

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the Annals of Family Medicine.