Annals of Family Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Annals of Family Medicine 5:233-241 (2007)
© 2007 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
doi: 10.1370/afm.697
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental data: Appendix
Right arrow In Brief
Right arrow TRACK Discussion: Submit a Comment
Right arrow TRACK Discussion: View Comments
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when TRACK Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Feifer, C.
Right arrow Articles by Ornstein, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Feifer, C.
Right arrow Articles by Ornstein, S. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Mixed methods
Right arrow PBRN research
Right arrow Health informatics
Right arrow Organizational / practice change
Right arrow Quality improvement

Different Paths to High-Quality Care: Three Archetypes of Top-Performing Practice Sites

Chris Feifer, DrPH1, Lynne Nemeth, PhD, RN2, Paul J. Nietert, PhD3, Andrea M. Wessell, PharmD4, Ruth G. Jenkins, PhD5, Loraine Roylance, MA5 and Steven M. Ornstein, MD5

1 Department of Family Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif
2 College of Nursing and Clinical Services, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
3 Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Epidemiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
4 Department of Pharmacy and Clinical Sciences, South Carolina College of Pharmacy, Medical University of South Carolina Campus, Charleston, SC
5 Department of Family Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Chris Feifer, DrPH, Department of Family Medicine, Keck School of Medicine University of Southern California, 1420 San Pablo St, PMB-B205 Los Angeles, CA 90033, feifer{at}usc.edu

PURPOSE Primary care practices use different approaches in their quest for high-quality care. Previous work in the Practice Partner Research Network (PPRNet) found that improved outcomes are associated with strategies to prioritize performance, involve staff, redesign elements of the delivery system, make patients active partners in guideline adherence, and use tools embedded in the electronic medical record. The aim of this study was to examine variations in the adoption of improvements among sites achieving the best outcomes.

METHODS This study used an observational case study design. A practice-level measure of adherence to clinical guidelines was used to identify the highest performing practices in a network of internal and family medicine practices participating in a national demonstration project. We analyzed qualitative and quantitative information derived from project documents, field notes, and evaluation questionnaires to develop and compare case studies.

RESULTS Nine cases are described. All use many of the same improvement strategies. Differences in the way improvements are organized define 3 distinct archetypes: the Technophiles, the Motivated Team, and the Care Enterprise. There is no single approach that explains the superior performance of high-performing practices, though each has adopted variations of PPRNet’s improvement model.

CONCLUSIONS Practices will vary in their path to high-quality care. The archetypes could prove to be a useful guide to other practices selecting an overall quality improvement approach.

Key Words: Quality improvement • quality assurance, health care • primary health care




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Health Informatics JournalHome page
S. L. West, C. Blake, Zhiwen Liu, J. N. McKoy, M. D. Oertel, and T. S. Carey
Reflections on the use of electronic health record data for clinical research
Health Informatics Journal, June 1, 2009; 15(2): 108 - 121.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J Am Board Fam MedHome page
L. S. Nemeth, P. J. Nietert, and S. M. Ornstein
High Performance in Screening for Colorectal Cancer: A Practice Partner Research Network (PPRNet) Case Study
J Am Board Fam Med, March 1, 2009; 22(2): 141 - 146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Am Board Fam MedHome page
T. C. Rosenthal
The Medical Home: Growing Evidence to Support a New Approach to Primary Care
J Am Board Fam Med, September 1, 2008; 21(5): 427 - 440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann Fam MedHome page
K. C. Stange
In This Issue: New Concepts for Diabetes and Chronic Disease Management
Ann. Fam. Med, May 1, 2007; 5(3): 194 - 195.
[Full Text] [PDF]

TRACK Comments:

Read all TRACK Comments

Paths using practice archetypes may lead in the wrong direction
David G Litaker
Annals of Family Medicine, 5 Jun 2007 [Full text]
Technophile's response
Susan T Andrews
Annals of Family Medicine, 5 Jun 2007 [Full text]

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the Annals of Family Medicine.