HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental data: Appendixes 1-3 In Brief TRACK Comments: Submit a response TRACK Comments: View responses Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when TRACK Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Google Scholar Articles by Cheraghi-Sohi, S. Articles by Roland, M. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cheraghi-Sohi, S. Articles by Roland, M.

What Patients Want From Primary Care Consultations: A Discrete Choice Experiment to Identify Patients’ Priorities

¹ National Primary Care Research and Development Centre (NPCRDC), University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
² National Primary Care Research and Development Centre (NPCRDC), Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, United Kingdom

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Peter Bower, PhD, National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom, peter.bower{at}manchester.ac.uk

PURPOSE The consultation is fundamental to the delivery of primary care, but different ways of organizing consultations may lead to different patient experiences in terms of access, continuity, technical quality of care, and communication. Patients’ priorities for these different issues need to be understood, but the optimal methods for assessing priorities are unclear. This study used a discrete choice experiment to assess patients’ priorities.

METHODS We surveyed patients from 6 family practices in England. The patients chose between primary care consultations differing in attributes such as ease of access (wait for an appointment), choice (flexibility of appointment times), continuity (physician’s knowledge of the patient), technical quality (thoroughness of physical examination), and multiple aspects of patient-centered care (interest in patient’s ideas, inquiry about patient’s social and emotional well-being, and involvement of patient in decision making). We used probit models to assess the relative priority patients placed on different attributes and to estimate how much they were willing to pay for them.

RESULTS Analyses were based on responses from 1,193 patients (a 53% response rate). Overall, patients were willing to pay the most for a thorough physical examination ($40.87). The next most valued attributes of care were seeing a physician who knew them well ($12.18), seeing a physician with a friendly manner ($8.50), having a reduction in waiting time of 1 day ($7.22), and having flexibility of appointment times ($6.71). Patients placed similar value on the different aspects of patient-centered care ($12.06–$14.82). Responses were influenced by the scenario in which the decision was made (minor physical problem vs urgent physical problem vs ambiguous physical or psychological problem) and by patients’ demographic characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS Although patient-centered care is important to patients, they may place higher priority on the technical quality of care and continuity of care. Discrete choice experiments may be a useful method for assessing patients’ priorities in health care.

Key Words: Priorities • primary care • patient-centered care • office visits • physician-patient relations • quality of care • health services research • health care delivery

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Roland Assessing the options available to Lord Darzi BMJ, March 22, 2008; 336(7645): 625 - 626. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. C. Stange In This Issue: What Patients Value and How to Provide It Ann. Fam. Med, March 1, 2008; 6(2): 98 - 99. [Full Text] [PDF]

TRACK Comments: