Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

What Patients Want From Primary Care Consultations: A Discrete Choice Experiment to Identify Patients’ Priorities

Sudeh Cheraghi-Sohi, Arne Risa Hole, Nicola Mead, Ruth McDonald, Diane Whalley, Peter Bower and Martin Roland
The Annals of Family Medicine March 2008, 6 (2) 107-115; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.816
Sudeh Cheraghi-Sohi
BSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arne Risa Hole
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicola Mead
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ruth McDonald
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Diane Whalley
MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Bower
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martin Roland
DM
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

PURPOSE The consultation is fundamental to the delivery of primary care, but different ways of organizing consultations may lead to different patient experiences in terms of access, continuity, technical quality of care, and communication. Patients’ priorities for these different issues need to be understood, but the optimal methods for assessing priorities are unclear. This study used a discrete choice experiment to assess patients’ priorities.

METHODS We surveyed patients from 6 family practices in England. The patients chose between primary care consultations differing in attributes such as ease of access (wait for an appointment), choice (flexibility of appointment times), continuity (physician’s knowledge of the patient), technical quality (thoroughness of physical examination), and multiple aspects of patient-centered care (interest in patient’s ideas, inquiry about patient’s social and emotional well-being, and involvement of patient in decision making). We used probit models to assess the relative priority patients placed on different attributes and to estimate how much they were willing to pay for them.

RESULTS Analyses were based on responses from 1,193 patients (a 53% response rate). Overall, patients were willing to pay the most for a thorough physical examination ($40.87). The next most valued attributes of care were seeing a physician who knew them well ($12.18), seeing a physician with a friendly manner ($8.50), having a reduction in waiting time of 1 day ($7.22), and having flexibility of appointment times ($6.71). Patients placed similar value on the different aspects of patient-centered care ($12.06–$14.82). Responses were influenced by the scenario in which the decision was made (minor physical problem vs urgent physical problem vs ambiguous physical or psychological problem) and by patients’ demographic characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS Although patient-centered care is important to patients, they may place higher priority on the technical quality of care and continuity of care. Discrete choice experiments may be a useful method for assessing patients’ priorities in health care.

  • Priorities
  • primary care
  • patient-centered care
  • office visits
  • physician-patient relations
  • quality of care
  • health services research
  • health care delivery
  • Received for publication August 1, 2007.
  • Revision received October 25, 2007.
  • Accepted for publication November 14, 2007.
  • © 2008 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 6 (2)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 6 (2)
Vol. 6, Issue 2
1 Mar 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
What Patients Want From Primary Care Consultations: A Discrete Choice Experiment to Identify Patients’ Priorities
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
8 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
What Patients Want From Primary Care Consultations: A Discrete Choice Experiment to Identify Patients’ Priorities
Sudeh Cheraghi-Sohi, Arne Risa Hole, Nicola Mead, Ruth McDonald, Diane Whalley, Peter Bower, Martin Roland
The Annals of Family Medicine Mar 2008, 6 (2) 107-115; DOI: 10.1370/afm.816

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
What Patients Want From Primary Care Consultations: A Discrete Choice Experiment to Identify Patients’ Priorities
Sudeh Cheraghi-Sohi, Arne Risa Hole, Nicola Mead, Ruth McDonald, Diane Whalley, Peter Bower, Martin Roland
The Annals of Family Medicine Mar 2008, 6 (2) 107-115; DOI: 10.1370/afm.816
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Teamwork Among Primary Care Staff to Achieve Regular Follow-Up of Chronic Patients
  • Development and content validation of a questionnaire identifying patients functional priorities and abilities after hip or knee arthroplasty
  • La continuite dans les milieux denseignement universitaire: Explorer le potentiel du Centre de medecine de famille du CMFC
  • Continuity in the academic family medicine teaching environment: Exploring the potential of the CFPCs Patients Medical Home
  • Reasons Older Veterans Use the Veterans Health Administration and Non-VHA Care in an Urban Environment
  • Primary medical care continuity and patient mortality: a systematic review
  • Relational continuity and patients perception of GP trust and respect: a qualitative study
  • What matters to patients?: a timely question for Value Based Care
  • What publicly available quality metrics do hip and knee arthroplasty patients care about most when selecting a hospital in Maryland: a discrete choice experiment
  • Patient trade-offs between continuity and access in primary care interprofessional teaching clinics in Canada: a cross-sectional survey using discrete choice experiment
  • Importance of accessibility and opening hours to overall patient experience of general practice: analysis of repeated cross-sectional data from a national patient survey
  • Patients perceptions of access to primary care: Analysis of the QUALICOPC Patient Experiences Survey
  • Extended opening hours and patient experience of general practice in England: multilevel regression analysis of a national patient survey
  • Capturing patient experience: a qualitative study of implementing real-time feedback in primary care
  • How valuable is physical examination of the cardiovascular system?
  • Measuring health-related quality of life in adults with chronic conditions in primary care settings: Critical review of concepts and 3 tools
  • Consumers Shares of Preferences for Turfgrass Attributes Using a Discrete Choice Experiment and the Best-Worst Method
  • A Discrete Choice Experiment to Examine the Preferences of Patients With Cancer and Their Willingness to Pay for Different Types of Health Care Appointments
  • Rhetoric and reality in person-centred care: introducing the House of Care framework
  • The relative importance of perceived doctor's attitude on the decision to consult for symptomatic osteoarthritis: a choice-based conjoint analysis study
  • Patients views on pay for performance in France: a qualitative study in primary care
  • Patient-reported areas for quality improvement in general practice: a cross-sectional survey
  • The Australian public's preferences for emergency care alternatives and the influence of the presenting context: a discrete choice experiment
  • Evidence and rhetoric about access to UK primary care
  • Patients' experiences of the choice of GP practice pilot, 2012/2013: a mixed methods evaluation
  • Future Perfect
  • Validation of 2 New Measures of Continuity of Care Based on Year-to-Year Follow-up With Known Providers of Health Care
  • Accessing primary care: a simulated patient study
  • In This Issue: Local+Familiar=Healthier
  • Measuring continuity of care: psychometric properties of the Nijmegen Continuity Questionnaire
  • Patients' views of pay for performance in primary care: a qualitative study
  • Questionnaire severity measures for depression: a threat to the doctor-patient relationship?
  • Changes in Patient Experiences of Primary Care During Health Service Reforms in England Between 2003 and 2007
  • Patient-centered Care
  • Understanding why some ethnic minority patients evaluate medical care more negatively than white patients: a cross sectional analysis of a routine patient survey in English general practices
  • Assessing the options available to Lord Darzi
  • In This Issue: What Patients Value and How to Provide It
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Neighborhood Determinants of Primary Care Access in Virginia
  • Proactive Deprescribing Among Older Adults With Polypharmacy: Barriers and Enablers
  • Artificial Intelligence Tools for Preconception Cardiomyopathy Screening Among Women of Reproductive Age
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods
  • Core values of primary care:
    • Access
    • Continuity
    • Personalized care
    • Relationship
  • Other topics:
    • Patient perspectives

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine