HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental data: Appendix In Brief TRACK Discussion: Submit a Comment Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when TRACK Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Campbell, S. M. Articles by Lester, H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Campbell, S. M. Articles by Lester, H. Related Collections Qualitative methods Health policy Health services Professional practice Continuity Relationship Quality improvement

The Experience of Pay for Performance in English Family Practice: A Qualitative Study

National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, the University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Stephen M. Campbell, PhD, National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester, Williamson Bldg, Oxford Rd, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK, stephen.campbell{at}manchester.ac.uk

PURPOSE We conducted an in-depth exploration of family physicians’ and nurses’ beliefs and concerns about changes to the family health care service as a result of the new pay-for-performance scheme in the United Kingdom (Quality and Outcomes Framework [QOF]).

METHODS Using a semistructured interview format, we interviewed 21 family doctors and 20 nurses in 22 nationally representative practices across England between February and August 2007.

RESULTS Participants believed the financial incentives had been sufficient to change behavior and to achieve targets. The findings suggest that it is not necessary to align targets to professional priorities and values to obtain behavior change, although doing so enhances enthusiasm and understanding. Participants agreed that the aims of the pay-for-performance scheme had been met in terms of improvements in disease-specific processes of patient care and physician income, as well as improved data capture. It also led to unintended effects, such as the emergence of a dual QOF-patient agenda within consultations, potential deskilling of doctors as a result of the enhanced role for nurses in managing long-term conditions, a decline in personal/relational continuity of care between doctors and patients, resentment by team members not benefiting financially from payments, and concerns about an ongoing culture of performance monitoring in the United Kingdom.

CONCLUSIONS The QOF scheme may have achieved its declared objectives of improving disease-specific processes of patient care through the achievement of clinical and organizational targets and increased physician income, but our findings suggest that it has changed the dynamic between doctors and nurses and the nature of the practitioner-patient consultation.

Key Words: Pay-for-performance • primary health care • United Kingdom

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. C. Stange The Problem of Fragmentation and the Need for Integrative Solutions Ann. Fam. Med, March 1, 2009; 7(2): 100 - 103. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Roland Lessons from the U.K. N. Engl. J. Med., November 13, 2008; 359(20): 2087 - 2092. [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. C. Rosenthal The Medical Home: Growing Evidence to Support a New Approach to Primary Care J Am Board Fam Med, September 1, 2008; 21(5): 427 - 440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. J. Frey III In This Issue: Doctor-Patient, Doctor-System, Doctor-Public Ann. Fam. Med, May 1, 2008; 6(3): 194 - 195. [Full Text] [PDF]