Annals of Family Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Annals of Family Medicine 7:542-546 (2009)
© 2009 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
doi: 10.1370/afm.1017
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow In Brief
Right arrow TRACK Discussion: Submit a Comment
Right arrow TRACK Discussion: View Comments
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when TRACK Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ewart, R.
Right arrow Articles by Millian, N.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ewart, R.
Right arrow Articles by Millian, N.
Related Collections
Right arrow Quantitative methods
Right arrow Health policy

Undisclosed Changes in Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials: An Observational Study

Robert Ewart, MD1, Harald Lausen, DO1 and Norman Millian, MD1,2

1 Department of Family and Community Medicine, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois
2 Second Street Family Practice Clinic, Auburn, Maine

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Robert Ewart, MD, SIU Center for Family Medicine 520 North 4th St PO Box 19670 Springfield, IL 62794-9670 rewart{at}siumed.edu

PURPOSE We wanted to investigate the frequency of undisclosed changes in the outcomes of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) between trial registration and publication.

METHODS Using a retrospective, nonrandom, cross-sectional study design, we investigated RCTs published in consecutive issues of 5 major medical journals during a 6-month period and their associated trials registry entries. Articles were excluded if they did not have an available trial registry entry, did not have analyzable outcomes, or were secondary publications. The primary outcome was the proportion of publications in which the primary outcome of the trial was, without disclosure, changed between that recorded in the trial registry and that reported in the final publication. The secondary outcome was the proportion of publications in which the secondary outcome was changed without disclosure.

RESULTS We reviewed 158 reports of RCTs and included 110 in the analysis. In 34 (31%), a primary outcome had been changed, and in 77 (70%), a secondary outcome had been changed.

CONCLUSIONS There are substantial and important undisclosed changes made to the outcomes of published RCTs between trial registration and publication. This finding has important implications for the interpretation of trial results. Disclosure and discussion of changes would improve transparency in the performance and reporting of trials.

Key Words: Endpoints • outcomes • trials registration




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Ann Fam MedHome page
L. S. Acheson and J. J. Frey III
In This Issue: Multifaceted Research
Ann. Fam. Med, November 1, 2009; 7(6): 482 - 483.
[Full Text] [PDF]

TRACK Comments:

Read all TRACK Comments

Response to Ewart et al. (Ann Fam Med 2009; 7: 542-546)
Steven A. Kaplan, et al.
Annals of Family Medicine, 9 Dec 2009 [Full text]

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the Annals of Family Medicine.