Annals of Family Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Annals of Family Medicine 8:S2-S8 (2010)
© 2010 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
doi: 10.1370/afm.1110

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental data: Appendix
Right arrow TRACK Discussion: Submit a Comment
Right arrow TRACK Discussion: View Comments
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when TRACK Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stange, K. C.
Right arrow Articles by Jaén, C. R.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stange, K. C.
Right arrow Articles by Jaén, C. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Health policy
Right arrow Health services
Right arrow Access
Right arrow Continuity
Right arrow Comprehensiveness
Right arrow Coordination / integration of care
Right arrow Personalized care
Right arrow Relationship
Right arrow Patient-centered medical home
Right arrow Organizational / practice change
Right arrow Social / cultural context

Context for Understanding the National Demonstration Project and the Patient-Centered Medical Home

Kurt C. Stange, MD, PhD, William L. Miller, MD, MA, Paul A. Nutting, MD, MSPH, Benjamin F. Crabtree, PhD, Elizabeth E. Stewart, PhD and Carlos Roberto Jaén, MD, PhD

Departments of Family Medicine, Epidemiology & Biostatistics, and Sociology, and The Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (Stange); Department of Family Medicine, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown; and Department of Family and Community Medicine, Pennsylvania State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania (Miller); Center for Research Strategies, Denver, Colorado, and Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Aurora, Colorado (Nutting); Department of Family Medicine, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, University of Medicine & Dentistry of New Jersey, New Brunswick; Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Medicine & Dentistry of New Jersey, Piscataway; and Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey (Crabtree); National Research Network, American Academy of Family Physicians, Leawood, Kansas (at the time of the project, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio) (Stewart); Departments of Family & Community Medicine, and of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas (Jaén).

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Kurt C. Stange, MD, PhD, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Ave, LC 7136, Cleveland, OH 44106, kcs{at}case.edu

This article introduces a journal supplement evaluating the country’s first national demonstration of the patient-centered medical home (PCMH) concept. The PCMH is touted by some as a linchpin for renewing the foundering US health care system and its primary care foundation.

The National Demonstration Project (NDP) tested a new model of care and compared facilitated and self-directed implementation approaches in a group-randomized clinical trial. The NDP asked what a national sample of 36 highly motivated family practices could accomplish in moving toward the PCMH ideal during 2 years within the current US health care payment and organizational system. Our independent evaluation used a multimethod approach that integrated qualitative methods to tell the NDP story from multiple perspectives and quantitative methods to assess and compare aspects that could be measured. The 7 scientific reports presented in this supplement explain the process, outcomes, lessons, and implications of the NDP.

This introductory article provides context for making sense of the NDP. Important context includes the evolution of the PCMH concept and movement, the roots of the NDP and how it developed, and both what is valuable and what is problematic about family medicine and primary care.

Together, the articles in this supplement show how primary care practices and the concept of the PCMH can continue to evolve. The evaluation depicts some of the early effects of this evolution on patients and practices, and shows how the process of practice development can be understood and how lessons from the NDP can inform ongoing and future efforts to transform primary care and health care systems.

Key Words: Primary care • family practice • National Demonstration Project • organizational change • quality improvement • patient-centered medical home • patient-centered care • practice-based research




TRACK Comments:

Read all TRACK Comments

The Remains of the Day
Richard D Iliff
Annals of Family Medicine, 11 Jun 2010 [Full text]
Good learning from NDP: we need more than one approach to transformation
L Gordon Moore
Annals of Family Medicine, 11 Jun 2010 [Full text]
Thank you TransfoMED
Thomas A. Sinsky
Annals of Family Medicine, 17 Jun 2010 [Full text]
Future Victory
David Margolius
Annals of Family Medicine, 19 Jun 2010 [Full text]
What Will the AAFP Do Now?
Robert S Watkins
Annals of Family Medicine, 21 Jun 2010 [Full text]
PCMH: The difference between having one and being one
David W Bauer
Annals of Family Medicine, 28 Jun 2010 [Full text]
Raising Roses in the Desert, with a Cup of Water
Larry A. Green
Annals of Family Medicine, 2 Jul 2010 [Full text]



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2010 by the Annals of Family Medicine.