Annals of Family Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Annals of Family Medicine 8:S80-S90 (2010)
© 2010 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
doi: 10.1370/afm.1107

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow TRACK Discussion: Submit a Comment
Right arrow TRACK Discussion: View Comments
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when TRACK Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crabtree, B. F.
Right arrow Articles by Jaén, C. R.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Crabtree, B. F.
Right arrow Articles by Jaén, C. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Health policy
Right arrow Professional practice
Right arrow Access
Right arrow Coordination / integration of care
Right arrow Personalized care
Right arrow Relationship
Right arrow Patient-centered medical home
Right arrow Organizational / practice change
Right arrow Quality improvement

Summary of the National Demonstration Project and Recommendations for the Patient-Centered Medical Home

Benjamin F. Crabtree, PhD, Paul A. Nutting, MD, MSPH, William L. Miller, MD, MA, Kurt C. Stange, MD, PhD, Elizabeth E. Stewart, PhD and Carlos Roberto Jaén, MD, PhD

Department of Family Medicine, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, University of Medicine & Dentistry of New Jersey, New Brunswick; Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Medicine & Dentistry of New Jersey, Piscataway; and Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey (Crab-tree); Center for Research Strategies, Denver, Colorado and Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Aurora, Colorado (Nutting); Department of Family Medicine, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown; and Department of Family and Community Medicine, Pennsylvania State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania (Miller); Departments of Family Medicine, Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Sociology, and The Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (Stange); National Research Network, American Academy of Family Physicians, Leawood, Kansas (at the time of the project, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio) (Stewart); Departments of Family & Community Medicine, and of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas (Jaén).

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Benjamin F. Crabtree, PhD, Department of Family Medicine, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson, Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ 08873, crabtrbf{at}umdnj.edu

This article summarizes findings from the National Demonstration Project (NDP) and makes recommendations for policy makers and those implementing patient-centered medical homes (PCMHs) based on these findings and an understanding of diverse efforts to transform primary care.

The NDP was launched in June 2006 as the first national test of a particular PCMH model in a diverse sample of 36 family practices, randomized to facilitated or self-directed groups. An independent evaluation team used a multimethod evaluation strategy, analyzing data from direct observation, depth interviews, e-mail streams, medical record audits, and patient and clinical staff surveys. Peer-reviewed manuscripts from the NDP provide answers to 4 key questions: (1) Can the NDP model be built? (2) What does it take to build the NDP model? (3) Does the NDP model make a difference in quality of care? and (4) Can the NDP model be widely disseminated?

We find that although it is feasible to transform independent practices into the NDP conceptualization of a PCMH, this transformation requires tremendous effort and motivation, and benefits from external support. Most practices will need additional resources for this magnitude of transformation.

Recommendations focus on the need for the PCMH model to continue to evolve, for delivery system reform, and for sufficient resources for implementing personal and practice development plans. In the meantime, we find that much can be done before larger health system reform.

Key Words: Primary care • family practice • organizational change • quality improvement • National Demonstration Project • patient-centered medical home • patient-centered care • practice-based research




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Board Fam MedHome page
K. Gallagher, P. A. Nutting, D. E. Nease Jr., D. G. Graham, A. J. Bonham, W. P. Dickinson, and D. S. Main
It Takes Two: Using Coleaders to Champion Improvements in Small Primary Care Practices
J Am Board Fam Med, September 1, 2010; 23(5): 632 - 639.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

TRACK Comments:

Read all TRACK Comments

Income Impact of PCMH
Richard D Iliff
Annals of Family Medicine, 8 Jun 2010 [Full text]
the NDP
Jean M Antonucci
Annals of Family Medicine, 13 Jun 2010 [Full text]
Value of this work
Jeffrey Borkan
Annals of Family Medicine, 1 Jul 2010 [Full text]



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2010 by the Annals of Family Medicine.