Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Brief

Practice Capacity to Address Patients’ Social Needs and Physician Satisfaction and Perceived Quality of Care

Matthew S. Pantell, Emilia De Marchis, Angeli Bueno and Laura M. Gottlieb
The Annals of Family Medicine January 2019, 17 (1) 42-45; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2334
Matthew S. Pantell
1Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, California
MD, MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Matt.Pantell@ucsf.edu
Emilia De Marchis
2Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Angeli Bueno
2Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laura M. Gottlieb
2Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California
3Social Interventions Research and Evaluations Network, University of California, San Francisco, California
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Recent studies have explored clinician impacts of health care–based interventions that respond to patients’ social and economic needs. These studies were limited by available clinician data. We used the Commonwealth International Health Policy Survey of 890 primary care physicians to examine associations between clinic capacity to respond to patients’ social needs and physician satisfaction, stress, and perceived medical care quality. Results suggest that perceived capacity to address social needs is strongly associated with both clinician satisfaction and perceived medical care quality. Our findings add to a growing literature on the potential return on investment of clinical interventions to address social needs.

Key words
  • social needs
  • care coordination
  • vulnerable populations
  • acommunity/population health
  • job satisfaction
  • quality of care
  • health policy
  • professional practice
  • disparities in health & health care
  • practice-based research
  • primary care

INTRODUCTION

Agrowing body of evidence explores how addressing patients’ adverse social circumstances in the context of health care delivery may affect their health and decrease avoidable health care cost and use.1 Two recent studies suggest that the impacts of greater clinical capacity to intervene on patients social and economic needs can extend beyond patients to clinicians, including a reduction in symptoms of burnout.2,3 These studies were limited in that they included few clinician-level variables. Using a large health policy study of primary care physicians, we explored associations between clinic capacity to address patients’ social and economic needs and physician job satisfaction, stress, and perceived quality of medical care.

METHODS

Data came from the Commonwealth Fund’s 2015 International Survey of Primary Care Physicians.4 in which questionnaires were distributed to a random sample of primary care physicians in 11 countries. This study included US physicians only. Initial recruitment was through mail; questionnaires were self-completed on paper or online. A total of 1,001 US physicians responded (response rate = 30.9%), of whom 170 had missing data on relevant variables. We used multiple imputation to impute missing data for 59 physicians, yielding a final analytic sample of 890 (11.1%).

Two measures were used to capture capacity to address patient social needs. The first measure was preparedness to manage patients with social needs, defined as answering “well prepared” or “somewhat prepared” vs “not prepared” to the question, “How prepared is your practice to manage care for patients in need of social services in the community (eg, housing, meals, and transportation)?” The second measure was ease of care coordination, defined as answering “very easy” or “easy” vs “somewhat difficult” or “very difficult” to the question, “How easy or difficult is it to coordinate your patient’s care with social services or other community providers when needed (eg, housing, meals, and transportation)?”

We assessed 6 physician outcomes: job satisfaction; job stress; general income satisfaction; relative income satisfaction compared with special ists; satisfaction with time spent with patients; and views on whether the quality of medical care has declined over the past 3 years.

All analyses were performed using Stata version 15.0 (StataCorp LP). To evaluate associations between perceived clinic capacity to address patient social needs and physician outcomes, we conducted bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses adjusting for demographic and practice variables. All models used survey weights to adjust for non-response based on known sociodemographic parameters of clinician sex, age, region, and specialty. Multiple imputation was performed to impute missing data for all variables except sex and outcomes. The study was considered exempt by our institutional review board.

RESULTS

Characteristics of the study sample are in Table 1. The largest share of the 890 physicians worked in a practice located in a city. Most reported often (36.6%) or sometimes (45.4%) caring for patients needing social services. On average, 33.7% felt that their clinic was prepared (well or somewhat) to manage patients needing these services, and 37.5% felt it was easy (very easy or easy) to coordinate patient care.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Physician and Practice Characteristics (N = 890)

Physicians who reported practicing in a clinic prepared to manage patients with social needs had higher job satisfaction (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] for very satisfied vs very dissatisfied = 3.23; 95% CI, 1.47-7.09), were more satisfied with amount of time spent with patients, (aOR for very satisfied vs very dissatisfied = 2.86; 95% CI, 1.37-6.00), and were more likely to think that the quality of medical care patients receive has improved (aOR = 1.72; 95% CI, 1.19-2.49) (Table 2). Income satisfaction in general and relative to specialists was significantly associated with clinic preparedness to address patients with social needs initially, but not after controlling for how frequently the practice saw patients with social needs. There was no association with job stress.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2a

Odds of Physician Outcomes Based on Practice Prepared to Address Patients’ Social Needs (N = 890)

Physicians who reported that it was easy to coordinate patients’ care with social services or other community clinicians had higher job satisfaction (aOR for very satisfied vs very dissatisfied = 2.75; 95% CI, 1.33-5.67), personal income satisfaction (aOR for very satisfied vs very dissatisfied = 2.28; 95% CI, 1.22-4.26), relative income satisfaction (aOR for very satisfied vs very dissatisfied = 3.08; 95% CI, 1.67-5.67), and satisfaction with amount of time spent with patients (aOR for very satisfied vs very dissatisfied = 3.39; 95% CI, 1.63-7.06), and they were more likely to perceive the quality of medical care as recently improved (aOR = 1.66; 95% CI, 1.20-2.30) in Table 2a and Supplemental Table 2b, available at http://www.AnnFamMed.org/content/17/1/42/suppl/DC1/. There was no significant association with job stress.

DISCUSSION

Clinic capacity to address patients’ social needs was associated with higher physician job satisfaction and the perception that patient medical care has recently improved. Similarly, physicians reporting that care coordination (facilitating connection with social/community resources) was easy were more likely to endorse higher job satisfaction. These findings suggest that the return on investment of activities related to patients’ social and economic needs may extend beyond patient health and use of care to clinician satisfaction—closely tied with clinician burnout and retention.5–7 Health systems should consider clinician impacts when calculating costs and benefits of clinical team-based activities to respond to patients’ social needs.

These data do not enable causality inferences; possibly, more satisfied physicians are more likely to believe that their clinics have the capacity to intervene on patients’ social needs. The data are also self-reported by a small sample of US physicians, which may result in both selection and response bias, limiting generalizability. Finally, the data do not include information on time and efficiency burdens that may be associated with interventions around patients’ social needs.8–10 Future work could link more objective measures of capacity to address social needs with other clinician outcomes.

Footnotes

  • Conflicts of interest: authors report none.

  • To read or post commentaries in response to this article, see it online at http://www.AnnFamMed.org/content/17/1/42.

  • Funding support: This article was supported by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (grant 74930).

  • Disclaimer: The contents of this article are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not represent the official views of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

  • Supplemental Materials: Available at http://www.AnnFamMed.org/content/17/1/42/suppl/DC1/.

  • Received for publication August 6, 2018.
  • Revision received October 3, 2018.
  • Accepted for publication October 18, 2018.
  • © 2019 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Gottlieb LM,
    2. Wing H,
    3. Adler NE
    . A systematic review of interventions on patients’ social and economic needs. Am J Prev Med. 2017; 53(5): 719–729.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Olayiwola JN,
    2. Willard-Grace R,
    3. Dubé K,
    4. et al
    . Higher perceived clinic capacity to address patients’ social needs associated with lower burnout in primary care providers. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2018; 29(1): 415–429.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. De Marchis EH,
    2. Knox M,
    3. Hessler D,
    4. et al
    . Perceived clinic capacity to address patients’ social needs and family physician burnout. J Am Board Fam Med. 2019. In press.
  4. ↵
    The Commonwealth Fund. 2015 Commonwealth Fund international survey of primary care physicians in 10 nations. https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/surveys/2015/dec/2015-commonwealth-fund-international-survey-primary-care-physicians. Published Dec 7, 2015. Accessed Jul 10, 2018.
  5. ↵
    1. Whitebird RR,
    2. Solberg LI,
    3. Crain AL,
    4. et al
    . Clinician burnout and satisfaction with resources in caring for complex patients. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2017; 44: 91–95.
    OpenUrl
    1. Bodenheimer T,
    2. Sinsky C
    . From triple to quadruple aim: care of the patient requires care of the provider. Ann Fam Med. 2014; 12(6): 573–576.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Shanafelt T,
    2. Goh J,
    3. Sinsky C
    . The business case for investing in physician well-being. JAMA Intern Med. 2017; 177(12): 1826–1832.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Hayashi AS,
    2. Selia E,
    3. McDonnell K
    . Stress and provider retention in underserved communities. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2009; 20(3): 597–604.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. VITAL WorkLife, Inc. VITAL WorkLife and Cejka Search Physician Stress and Burnout Survey. http://www.physicianwellnessservices.com/news/stresssurvey.php. Accessed Jul 5, 2018.
  9. ↵
    1. Spinelli WM,
    2. Fernstrom KM,
    3. Britt H,
    4. Pratt R
    . “Seeing the patient is the joy: ” a focus group analysis of burnout in outpatient providers. Fam Med. 2016; 48(4): 273–278.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 17 (1)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 17 (1)
Vol. 17, Issue 1
January/February 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Practice Capacity to Address Patients’ Social Needs and Physician Satisfaction and Perceived Quality of Care
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Practice Capacity to Address Patients’ Social Needs and Physician Satisfaction and Perceived Quality of Care
Matthew S. Pantell, Emilia De Marchis, Angeli Bueno, Laura M. Gottlieb
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2019, 17 (1) 42-45; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2334

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Practice Capacity to Address Patients’ Social Needs and Physician Satisfaction and Perceived Quality of Care
Matthew S. Pantell, Emilia De Marchis, Angeli Bueno, Laura M. Gottlieb
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2019, 17 (1) 42-45; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2334
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Mise en {oelig}uvre dinterventions sociales en soins de sante primaires
  • Sams Story: The Financial and Human Costs of Disjointed Logics of Care
  • Implementing social interventions in primary care
  • Provider Impacts of Socioeconomic Risk Screening and Referral Programs: A Scoping Review
  • Capacity to Address Social Needs Affects Primary Care Clinician Burnout
  • In This Issue: Humans of Primary Care Research
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Genital Tucking Practices in Transgender and Gender Diverse Patients
  • Update to Gabapentinoid Use in the United States, 2002-2021
  • Implications of Overturning Roe v Wade on Abortion Training in US Family Medicine Residency Programs
Show more Research Brief

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Person groups:
    • Vulnerable populations
    • Community / population health
  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods
  • Other research types:
    • Health policy
    • Professional practice
  • Other topics:
    • Quality improvement
    • Disparities in health and health care
    • Social / cultural context

Keywords

  • social needs
  • care coordination
  • vulnerable populations
  • acommunity/population health
  • job satisfaction
  • quality of care
  • health policy
  • professional practice
  • disparities in health & health care
  • practice-based research
  • primary care

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine