| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 Department of Family Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
2 Department of Family Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Arch G. Mainous III, PhD, Department of Family, Medicine Medical University of, South Carolina 295, Calhoun Street, PO Box, 250192 Charleston, SC 29425, mainouag{at}musc.edu
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
METHODS Data on 4,454 patients collected in The Direct Observation of Primary Care (DOPC) study conducted between October 1994 and August 1995 were analyzed to assess the value patients place on continuity, length of patient-physician relationship, and experiences shared between patient and physician.
RESULTS A significant interaction was yielded between duration of relationship and experiences shared between patient and physician (P = .03). For all lengths of relationship with the physician, the value that patients have for continuity increased when patients indicated experiences shared with the physician. For patients who did not report experiences shared with the physician, the longer the relationship, the greater the value placed on continuity.
CONCLUSIONS The results of this study point to the importance of the experiences shared between patients and physicians and the value that patients place on continuity with their regular physician.
Key Words: Continuity of patient care • physician patient relationship • critical incident • patient satisfaction
|
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
It is unclear what creates a patient’s desire for continuity of care.1 For example, patients with asthma have a greater desire than the general population to maintain continuity with their physician, even when the visit is not for asthma.6 Asthmatic patients have frequent contacts with their physician, but they may also link successful resolution of an exacerbation to the skill of the physician. The purpose of this study is to examine the independent and interactive impact of longitudinal physician continuity and shared experiences of patients and physicians on patients’ desires for continuity of care.
|
METHODS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
Measures
Degree to Which Patients Value Continuity
The patient’s value of continuity was determined by 3 self-reported items: "My medical care improves when I see the same doctor that I have seen before," "It is very important to me to see my regular doctor," and "I want one doctor to coordinate all of the health care I receive" (1 = strongly disagree; 5 = strongly agree). The responses to the 3 items were averaged to create an index (Chronbach’s 
= .67).
Shared Experience Between Patient and Physician Experiences shared between patients and physicians were measured by the following self-reported item: "This doctor and I have been through a lot together" (1 = strongly disagree; 5 = strongly agree). The responses were collapsed into 3 categories of agreement (disagree, neutral, and agree).
Length of Patient-Physician Relationship The length of the patient-physician relationship was measured according to patient self-report as less than 2 years, 2 to 4 years, and more than 4 years.
Covariates Several variables have been previously found to be bivariately associated with patients valuing continuity, including patient age, sex, race, educational level attained, health status, number of visits in previous year, number of medications, number of chronic illnesses, and type of insurance. Self-reported health status was measured on the patient exit questionnaire using a 5-item index modified from the Medical Outcome Study 6-item General Health Survey.8
Linear regression using backward selection of value of continuity onto the potential covariates was used to determine which covariates were independently associated with patients valuing continuity and thereby needed for adjustment.
Analyses
The relationship between the duration of relationship with the physician and a key event with physician (independent variables) with value of continuity (dependent variable) was analyzed using a 2-way analysis of variance while controlling for the confounding variables.
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
. A significant interaction was found between duration of relationship and experiences shared between patients and physicians. The effect of experiences shared with the physician on the degree to which patients value continuity is dependent on the length of the patient’s relationship with the physician, and vice versa.
|
. For all lengths of relationship with the physician, the patients’ value of continuity increased when patients had a shared experience with the physician. Also, for all 3 categories of key event, the patient’s value of continuity was higher when the patient had been with the physician for more than 4 years than when the patient had been with the physician for less than 2 years. Magnitude of difference, however, was not the same for all levels of key event. For patients who responded that they did not have a shared experience with the physician, the difference in value of continuity by length of relationship appeared to be greater than for patients that agreed or responded neutrally.
|
|
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
This finding dovetails with previous discussions suggesting that the construct of continuity of care needs to be conceptualized in a way that distinguishes contact between patient and physician from the development of personal relationships.1 The personal relationship has been argued to be more important than simply having exposure to the same physician. Some physicians develop relationships within a short period, whereas others may see patients for years and still not have developed a strong patient-physician relationship. The developing relationship may be tied, however, to the successful management of important medical problems. The data support past research that suggests patients who have medical problems requiring substantial intervention on the part of the physician are more likely to exhibit a desire for continuity.6
The results of this study must be evaluated in light of several limitations. First, the data are all based on self-reports and thereby could be influenced by recall bias or social desirability. Even so, many of the measures have been previously validated and used successfully in other studies. Second, the data may be somewhat dated because they derive from surveys conducted in 1994 and 1995. It is possible that the relationships may not represent current attitudes, although it seems unlikely that this process of developing relationships between patients and physicians would have changed substantially in the recent past. Third, the analysis is cross-sectional and thereby limits our ability to demonstrate causal pathways between the constructs of experiences shared between patients and physicians and how patients value continuity.
In conclusion, the present findings point to the importance of experiences shared between patients and physicians. The longitudinal relationship that can build between patients and physicians is enhanced by these shared experiences. Future research might elucidate the types of shared experiences that encourage a desire for continuity of care.
|
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Funding support: This research was supported by grants from the National Cancer Institute (1 R01 CA80862, 2 R01 CA80862, K24 CA81031) and by a Family Practice Research Center grant from the American Academy of Family Physicians.
Received for publication April 21, 2003. Revision received July 21, 2003. Accepted for publication August 8, 2003.
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  G. Sharma, K. E. Fletcher, D. Zhang, Y.-F. Kuo, J. L. Freeman, and J. S. Goodwin Continuity of Outpatient and Inpatient Care by Primary Care Physicians for Hospitalized Older Adults JAMA, April 22, 2009; 301(16): 1671 - 1680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. Sharma, J. Freeman, D. Zhang, and J. S. Goodwin Continuity of Care and Intensive Care Unit Use at the End of Life Arch Intern Med, January 12, 2009; 169(1): 81 - 86. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. Merenstein and J. Merenstein Patient Reflections: Saying Good-Bye to a Retiring Family Doctor J Am Board Fam Med, September 1, 2008; 21(5): 461 - 465. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Pandhi and J. W. Saultz Patients' perceptions of interpersonal continuity of care. J Am Board Fam Med, July 1, 2006; 19(4): 390 - 397. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. C. Stange How to Use the Annals Online Discussion Ann. Fam. Med, November 1, 2004; 2(6): 611 - 612. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. C. Stange In this Issue: The Patient-Clinician Relationship and Practice-Based Network Research Ann. Fam. Med, September 1, 2004; 2(5): 386 - 387. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Stewart Continuity, Care, and Commitment: The Course of Patient-Clinician Relationships Ann. Fam. Med, September 1, 2004; 2(5): 388 - 390. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
Read all TRACK Comments
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
