HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) TRACK Discussion: Submit a Comment Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when TRACK Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Stange, K. C. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Stange, K. C.

Radical Ideas

One function of the Annals online discussion (called TRACK) is to incubate and reveal emerging, sometimes radical ideas. Whereas the strength of the main body of articles published in the Annals is the peer-review process, the resulting selection process tends to emphasize the best of what is. The online discussion is more raw and emergent—a forum for what might be. The synopsis of the discussion presented here (called On TRACK) draws attention to a vision, emerging from the many venues of Annals readers’ lived experience, of how primary care can be transformed to meet the growing needs for chronic care and how true healing processes can be fostered. This On TRACK synopsis also highlights other radical ideas, using a sample of quotations from the online discussion.

CHRONIC CARE AND THE MANAGEMENT OF MULTIMORBIDITY

Studies by Starfield, Østbye, and Fortin in the last issue of Annals^1–3 brought forth from readers creative ideas about a vitally important role for primary care to meet the growing unmet needs for integrated care of multiple conditions.

The current financial model in the United States is antithetical to the needs of the population for high-quality, accessible, integrated health care. A new financing model is need to develop the most important value of primary care—the ability to provide and integrate care within the context of relationships with the patient, family, community, and the rest of the health care team. Current payment models, which emphasize large panel sizes and force short visits focused on single diseases, impede rather than foster relationships. Financing needs to encourage, rather than penalize, increasing access to those most in need.^4–10

The tautological assumptions of recent workforce projections¹¹ do not even begin to consider the possibility that reimbursement changes could expand primary care in ways that profoundly improve the health of the population.¹²

Forward-looking discussants highlight the need to use guidelines as only one part of a toolkit to support quality, rather than as a hammer that can pound out subtlety and personalization.^7,13

The supplement on Contemporary Challenges for Practice-Based Research Networks¹⁴ elicited apparently radical calls for supporting these learning laboratories—for developing the needed relationships among diverse participants and for sustainable electronic and personal infrastructure to develop the knowledge base for primary care.^15–20

HEALING

The calls for system reform highlighted above also represent an appeal to develop systems in which a broader range of healing is facilitated. The study by Egnew²¹ "draws our attention back to the original intent of being a doctor, where technical knowledge and medical interventions need to be used in service of the person of the patient."²²

"A response to suffering and the ordeal that it causes patients may most call for healers to ‘be present.’ Being present is indeed the most challenging aspect of healing for the courage it requires.... Putting these ideas together implies that a physician healer would be willing to accompany a patient on a journey into vulnerability to confront the demons of loss, fear, grief, and isolation that cause suffering. This journey is neither cognitive nor procedural, but emotional and unpredictable. Such confrontation offers the patient the possibility of finding a new equilibrium, sense of integrity and wholeness invested with new meaning."²³

"[T]he physician-patient relationship is important, but not necessarily central in the healing process. Family and community relationships may be even more important."²⁴

"I wish I had remembered, when Tom Egnew interviewed me, to talk about the role of imagination in healing.... The physician’s clinical imagination must be adequate to discover and respond to the sick patient’s altered self-consciousness. Illness induces predictable and identifiable fears and fantasies in medical settings, among which are fear of strangers and separation anxiety, fear of the loss of love and approval, of losing control of one’s body and mind, of injury and mutilation, along with guilt and shame and fear of retaliation. These threats undermine and subvert the patient’s sense of integrity and inhibit recovery. A physician who is unable or unwilling to deal with these demons is unlikely to rise above the requirements of mere technical competency. It is a formidable undertaking to wrestle with another’s injured self-consciousness but that is the place where healing happens."²⁵

OTHER RADICAL IDEAS

• "Treatment/caring in medicine today is seen as a commodity, with a measurable outcome that happens in a limited time and with a price tag on it. Can healing be a commodity?"²⁶
  
• "Family medicine is not merely the sum of our checkmarks.... Do not use (guidelines) as checklists to measure quality. Rather, apply them with intuition and creativity to integrate the guidelines with other chronic disease considerations, one or two acute problems, family needs, work problems, ethnic preferences, chemical dependency, transportation and economic constraints, drug sensitivities, preferences for the ‘pink pill’ or the ‘blue pill,’ the insurance restrictions, prior authorization, information from consultants and lab reports.... Foster and enjoy the relationship with each patient."¹³
  
• "[T]he rapid screening for HIV simultaneously should be considered to be incorporated while screening for gonorrhea."²⁷
  
• "The healthcare system has unnecessarily and unwisely limited its focus to post-event services for victims and punishment and isolation of perpetrators through the criminal justice system. As a clinician, I have experienced how health-system and community-level constraints have led to patterns of diagnosis, treatment, and health care delivery that do not address the root cause of intimate partner violence—perpetration."²⁸
  
• "By the time most people have tried acupuncture they feel either that their doctor has given up, they can’t deal with the medications, and/or they are trying every type of alternative treatment they have ever heard of. If you only knew how many times patients refer to their doctors as ‘an idiot.’"²⁹
  
• "If family physicians were valued and paid commensurate with their value, then their impressive income would be more than enough to lure medical students to the specialty."³⁰
  
• Regarding practice-based research networks: "Who will step up?" to invest in sustaining funding to "stabilize these critical laboratories—so little for so much."¹⁵
  
• "[The Annals] is accountable to the field, to its readers, to its sponsors, and to those who are working to build the strength and authority of family physicians."³¹
  
• "Clinical Jazz is the harmonious relationship between our experience as clinicians, the personal needs and desires of individual patients, and the best evidence offered by staying up to date with medical information."³²
  
• "Although I am not a Moslem, [I believe] in one of their sayings which means that the almighty helps those who take up the challenge."³³
  

MOVING FORWARD

The discussion since the last issue reflects some of the most important questions in health and (primary) health care. I encourage you to read the original comments, and particularly suggest the commentary by Fiscella.⁴ The perspectives of Aita,²³ Hroscikoski,⁹ Bayliss,¹⁰ and Agarwal⁵ also contain radical ideas that are ripe for implementation. Please contribute your vitality to this discussion at http://www.AnnFamMed.org. Click on "Discussion of articles" or follow the links for the article on which you wish to comment.

REFERENCES

1. Starfield B, Lemke KW, Herbert R, Pavlovich WD, Anderson G. Comorbidity and the use of primary care and specialist care in the elderly. Ann Fam Med. 2005;3:215–222.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Østbye T, Yarnall KS, Krause KM, Pollak KI, Gradison M, Michener JL. Is there time for management of patients with chronic diseases in primary care?. Ann Fam Med. 2005;3:209–214.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Fortin M, Bravo G, Hudon C, Vanasse A, LaPointe L. Prevalence of multimorbidity among adults seen in family practice. Ann Fam Med. 2005;3:223–228.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Fiscella K. Omission of race and class [eletter]. http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/eletters/3/3/215#2989, 14 June 2005.
5. Agarwal G. Multimorbidity prevalence as an indicator of physicians’ workload? [eletter]. http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/eletters/3/3/223#2140, 2 June 2005.
6. Bell HS. Guidelines and budgets [eletter]. http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/eletters/3/3/209#2321, 6 June 2005.
7. Beasley JW. Bravo – for highlighting the issue [eletter]. http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/eletters/3/3/209#2142, 2 June 2005.
8. Denmark DM. Further observations and opportunities [eletter]. http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/eletters/3/3/209#2126, 2 June 2005.
9. Hroscikoski MC. Economies of time: scarcity in the land of plenty. http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/eletters/3/3/209#2116, 1 Jun 2005.
10. Bayliss EA. Expanding our knowledge about processes of care for persons with multimorbidities [eletter]. http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/eletters/3/3/215#2980, 14 Jun 2005.
11. Phillips RL Jr, Dodoo M, Jaen CR, Green LA. COGME’s 16th Report to Congress: too many physicians could be worse than wasted. Ann Fam Med. 2005;3:268–270.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Ferrer RL. Unstated assumptions of COGME’s report deserve attention [eletter]. http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/eletters/3/3/268#2119, 1 Jun 2005.
13. Hankey TL. What good family doctors really do [eletter]. http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/eletters/3/3/209#2128, 2 Jun 2005.
14. The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation with support from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Contemporary challenges for practice-based research network. Ann Fam Med. 2005;3(Suppl 1):S1–S60.
15. Green LA. The need for sustaining financing and appropriate protection for patients and practices [eletter]. http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/eletters/3/suppl_1/s2#2681, 10 Jun 2005.
16. Beasley JW. When is a research network not a research network, or perhaps it’s more? [eletter]. http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/eletters/3/suppl_1/s12#2804, 12 Jun 2005.
17. Kuzel AJ. Electronic data collection for QI [eletter]. http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/eletters/3/suppl_1/s21#3298, 19 Jun 2005.
18. Zafar A, et al. Comments on the article on electronic data collection by Wilson Pace et al [eletter]. http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/eletters/3/suppl_1/s21#3300, 21 Jun 2005.
19. Nagykaldi ZJ, et al. Wireless solutions will dominate e-research [eletter]. http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/eletters/3/suppl_1/s21#2314, 6 Jun 2005.
20. van Weel C. Virtual databases for studying real life problems [eletter]. http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/eletters/3/suppl_1/s21#3305, 29 Jun 2005.
21. Egnew TR. The meaning of healing: transcending suffering. Ann Fam Med. 2005;3:255–262.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Wilson HJ. Healing and the doctor patient relationship [eletter]. http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/eletters/3/3/255#2089, 1 Jun 2005.
23. Aita VA. Response to Thomas Egnew’s the meaning of healing: transcending suffering [eletter]. http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/eletters/3/3/255#3207, 18 Jun 2005.
24. Scott JG. Research agenda for healing [eletter]. http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/eletters/3/3/255#2157, 3 Jun 2005.
25. Stephens GG. Egnew: the meaning of healing: transcending suffering [eletter]. http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/eletters/3/3/255#2543, 9 Jun 2005.
26. Silverman PR. Questions on the implications of the use and meaning of the word healing [eletter]. http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/eletters/3/3/255#3053, 15 Jun 2005.
27. Chauhan T. Consideration in favor of simultaneous screening for HIV infection and contact tracing [eletter]. http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/eletters/3/3/263#2207, 6 Jun 2005.
28. Cronholm PF. The primary care management of intimate partner violence: A health services issue [eletter]. http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/eletters/3/3/248#2122, 1 Jun 2005.
29. Robbins DA. An acupuncturist’s view [eletter]. http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/eletters/3/2/151#1889, 21 May 2005.
30. Anderson C, et al. New model of family medicine [eletter]. http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/eletters/2/suppl_1/s3#1723, 9 May 2005.
31. Gruman JC. The real value of reflection [eletter]. http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/eletters/3/3/197#2305, 6 Jun 2005.
32. Slawson DC. Clinical jazz: harmonizing the best evidence with clinical experience [eletter]. http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/eletters/3/3/271#2280, 6 Jun 2005.
33. Chauhan R. Himmattey mar-daa mududdey khudaa (Almighty helps the man who takes up the challenge) [eletter]. http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/eletters/3/2/115#1922, 23 May 2005.

This Article Full Text (PDF) TRACK Discussion: Submit a Comment Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when TRACK Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Stange, K. C. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Stange, K. C.