Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal ResearchA

Toward A Simple Diagnostic Index for Acute Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections

Bart J. Knottnerus, Suzanne E. Geerlings, Eric P. Moll van Charante and Gerben ter Riet
The Annals of Family Medicine September 2013, 11 (5) 442-451; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1513
Bart J. Knottnerus
1Department of General Practice, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: b.j.knottnerus@amc.uva.nl
Suzanne E. Geerlings
2Department of Internal Medicine/Infectious Diseases, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eric P. Moll van Charante
1Department of General Practice, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gerben ter Riet
1Department of General Practice, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

The Article in Brief

Toward a Simple Diagnostic Index for Acute Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections

Bart J. Knottnerus , and colleagues

Background Sixty percent of all women experience at least one acute uncomplicated urinary tract infection (UTI) during their life. Various medical history questions and urine investigations can be used for UTI diagnosis. This study analyzes different approaches to diagnosing acute uncomplicated urinary tract infections in women and proposes a model that reduces the number of questions asked and urine investigations needed.

What This Study Found Analyzing data on 196 women presenting with painful and/or frequent urination, researchers find that 3 questions, sometimes followed by a urine dipstick test, can provide a practical level of accuracy. Specifically, they recommend asking (1) does the patient think she has a UTI, (2) is there at least considerable pain on urination and (3) is there vaginal irritation? Asking these questions, they find, may be sufficient to correctly classify more than one-half of women with painful and/or frequent urination as having UTI risk of either less than 30 percent or greater than 70 percent. Subsequent performance of nitrite and blood dipstick tests raises this proportion to 73 percent. The percentage rises to 83 percent if a urine dipstick is performed only for patients with a UTI risk between 30 percent and 70 percent after history and avoids the possibility of a false-negative nitrate tests in patients with high UTI risk (greater than 70 percent) after history.

Implications

  • Expensive and time-consuming urinary sediment and dipslide tests may add little diagnostic information. The authors call for future research to validate these recommendations.

  View article

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine