Context Matters: The Experience of 14 Research Teams in Systematically Reporting Contextual Factors Important for Practice Change

Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to advance the internal and external validity of research by sharing our empirical experience and recommendations for systematically reporting contextual factors.
METHODS Fourteen teams conducting research on primary care practice transformation retrospectively considered contextual factors important to interpreting their findings (internal validity) and transporting or reinventing their findings in other settings/situations (external validity). Each team provided a table or list of important contextual factors and interpretive text included as appendices to the articles in this supplement. Team members identified the most important contextual factors for their studies. We grouped the findings thematically and developed recommendations for reporting context.
RESULTS The most important contextual factors sorted into 5 domains: (1) the practice setting, (2) the larger organization, (3) the external environment, (4) implementation pathway, and (5) the motivation for implementation. To understand context, investigators recommend (1) engaging diverse perspectives and data sources, (2) considering multiple levels, (3) evaluating history and evolution over time, (4) looking at formal and informal systems and culture, and (5) assessing the (often nonlinear) interactions between contextual factors and both the process and outcome of studies. We include a template with tabular and interpretive elements to help study teams engage research participants in reporting relevant context.
CONCLUSIONS These findings demonstrate the feasibility and potential utility of identifying and reporting contextual factors. Involving diverse stakeholders in assessing context at multiple stages of the research process, examining their association with outcomes, and consistently reporting critical contextual factors are important challenges for a field interested in improving the internal and external validity and impact of health care research.
- context
- methods
- research design
- validity
- generalizability
- patient-centered medical home
- primary care
- change
- organizational
- practice-based research
- transformation
- Received for publication March 30, 2013.
- Revision received April 9, 2013.
- Accepted for publication April 9, 2013.
- © 2013 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
In this issue
Jump to section
Related Articles
- No related articles found.
Cited By...
- Tailoring Implementation Strategies for Cardiovascular Disease Risk Calculator Adoption in Primary Care Clinics
- Tailoring Implementation Strategies for Cardiovascular Disease Risk Calculator Adoption in Primary Care Clinics
- 'Trying to fly the plane while we were building it. Applying a learning health systems approach to evaluate early-stage barriers and facilitators to implementing primary care transformation: a qualitative study
- The PUPPY Study - Protocol for a Longitudinal Mixed Methods Study Exploring Problems Coordinating and Accessing Primary Care for Attached and Unattached Patients Exacerbated During the COVID-19 Pandemic Year
- Regional variation in primary care improvement strategies and policy: case studies that consider qualitative contextual data for performance measurement in three Canadian provinces
- A Longitudinal Study of Trends in Burnout During Primary Care Transformation
- In This Issue: Community Health, Clinical Care, and Clinician Calling
- An OMERACT Initiative Toward Consensus to Identify and Characterize Candidate Contextual Factors: Report from the Contextual Factors Working Group
- Factors Related to Implementation and Reach of a Pragmatic Multisite Trial: The My Own Health Report (MOHR) Study
- Synthesis Of Research On Patient-Centered Medical Homes Brings Systematic Differences Into Relief
- Research Reporting Guidelines and the New Annals Instructions for Authors
- Achieving Coordinated Care for Patients With Complex Cases of Cancer: A Multiteam System Approach
- Effects of Patient-centered Medical Home Transformation on Child Patient Experience
- Capturing the experiences of patients across multiple complex interventions: a meta-qualitative approach
- In This Issue: Generalist Care Around the World
- Recommendations for a Mixed Methods Approach to Evaluating the Patient-Centered Medical Home
- Perspectives in Primary Care: Implementing Patient-Centered Care Coordination for Individuals with Multiple Chronic Medical Conditions
- The 5 R's: An Emerging Bold Standard for Conducting Relevant Research in a Changing World
- Tips for Readers, Reviewers, and Authors Advancing Health and Primary Health Care
- Understanding the Context of Health for Persons With Multiple Chronic Conditions: Moving From What Is the Matter to What Matters
- Organizational Culture Associated With Provider Satisfaction
- Lessons Learned From the Study of Primary Care Transformation
- In This Issue: Practice Change--Context Matters