Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
NewsDepartmentsF

THE COUNCIL OF ACADEMIC FAMILY MEDICINE PROCEDURAL AND MATERNITY CARE TRAINING GUIDELINES: A BETTER PATH TO CONSISTENCY IN COMPETENCY ASSESSMENT IN FAMILY MEDICINE

W. Fred Miser, Michael Tuggy, Natasha Bhuyan, Gretchen M. Dickson, James W. Jarvis, Lisa Maxwell, Michael Mazzone, Tom Miller, Karen Mitchell, Stephen Schultz and Todd Shaffer
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2015, 13 (3) 285-286; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1795
W. Fred Miser
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Tuggy
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Natasha Bhuyan
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gretchen M. Dickson
MD, MBA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James W. Jarvis
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lisa Maxwell
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Mazzone
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tom Miller
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karen Mitchell
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen Schultz
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Todd Shaffer
MD, MBA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

As an organization devoted to training residents to deliver high-quality family medicine care to their communities, we have struggled to determine those procedures in which we should require all residents to develop competency. To date we have lacked consistency in educational standards for both procedural and maternity care training. This lack of standardization has led to a wide range of skills (or lack thereof) in our graduates, which has impacted our scope of care and potentially endangered our credibility as a specialty. A consistent methodology in determining competency has also been lacking.

The latest guidance by the RC-FM is, “Residents must receive training to perform clinical procedures required for their future practices in ambulatory and hospital environments.”1 In the FAQ related to this, the RC-FM states, “As the list of procedures performed by the practicing family physicians varies based upon the needs of the community, the program directors and members of the faculty should develop a list of required procedures based upon the needs of their FMP (family medicine practice) and recommendations of organizations…”2

In response, the Council of Academic Family Medicine (CAFM) formed 2 task forces in the spring of 2014. The AFMRD took the lead on developing these guidelines, working with faculty members across the country to provide input into the process. The Society of Teachers of Family Medicine (STFM) Maternity Care and STFM Hospital and Procedures groups formed much of the task forces. After conference calls, a careful literature review, and collaborative efforts, draft guidelines were completed in December 2014. Next steps: gather broader input from family physician educators, update the guidelines based on this feedback, then return the documents to CAFM for final approval.

The task forces agreed upon a better method of determining competency that actually passes the common sense test—blending a minimum experience with a standardized competency assessment tool that breaks down the skills that need to be demonstrated by the trainee. The key feature is not relying on numbers alone and, in fact, the minimum numbers are reserved for the most skilled residents, not for the average resident. Most residents will need to exceed the minimum number for complex procedures before they are ready for competency assessment and to potentially be signed off as ready for independent practice.

The Maternity Care Guidelines outline training expectations for the 3 tiers of maternity care already being practiced in our family medicine community. These tiers are designated Ambulatory Maternity Care, Comprehensive Maternity Care, and Advanced Maternity Care. Instead of having a one-size-fits-all requirement from the RC-FM, we will have recommendations that reflect what individual residents are seeking in their training, based on the community in which they intend to practice. However, since maternity care is within the domain of our specialty, all programs are expected to offer Ambulatory Maternity Care training to residents to allow them to possess basic spontaneous delivery skills and sound prenatal care training. Even if a graduate does not plan to provide prenatal care for their patients in their practice, they must still possess knowledge of the medical complications of pregnancy and to be able assess the maternity care their patients may be receiving from another physician.

The Comprehensive Maternity Care criteria now include labor management as a key portion of experience requirement. With the current duty hour requirements, many residents manage women in labor for extensive periods of time, often making complex care decisions, but would receive no credit by credentialing bodies for that experience. The guidelines have a similar experience criteria model as the procedure guidelines—the minimum number of deliveries is 40, but in addition, they should manage an additional 40 patients in labor (that they may not deliver) during their training.

The Advanced Maternity Care tier outlines the expectations for training residents, and often fellows, to gain operative obstetrical maternity skills and management of higher risk pregnancies. This robust level of training is often needed in rural and underserved areas of our country and will create skilled providers of maternity care that those communities need.

We are entering an era of greater accountability to our communities we serve. Having these training guidelines for maternity care and for procedures will help us ensure we are training skilled family physicians with a sufficiently broad scope to provide care of higher quality that meets more the needs of their patients. We encourage broad adoption of these guidelines and tools in order to enhance both the skills and credibility of our graduates.

These working guidelines can be found on the AFMRD website, http://www.afmrd.org.

  • © 2015 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.

References

  1. ↵
    Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. ACGME Program Requirements for Graduate Medical Education in Family Medicine. July 1, 2014, page 18.
  2. ↵
    Frequently Asked Questions: Family Medicine Review Committee for Family Medicine. http://acgme.org/acgmeweb/Portals/0/PDFs/FAQ/120_family_medicine_FAQs_07012014.pdf. Accessed Mar 13, 2015.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 13 (3)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 13 (3)
Vol. 13, Issue 3
May/June 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
THE COUNCIL OF ACADEMIC FAMILY MEDICINE PROCEDURAL AND MATERNITY CARE TRAINING GUIDELINES: A BETTER PATH TO CONSISTENCY IN COMPETENCY ASSESSMENT IN FAMILY MEDICINE
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 10 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
THE COUNCIL OF ACADEMIC FAMILY MEDICINE PROCEDURAL AND MATERNITY CARE TRAINING GUIDELINES: A BETTER PATH TO CONSISTENCY IN COMPETENCY ASSESSMENT IN FAMILY MEDICINE
W. Fred Miser, Michael Tuggy, Natasha Bhuyan, Gretchen M. Dickson, James W. Jarvis, Lisa Maxwell, Michael Mazzone, Tom Miller, Karen Mitchell, Stephen Schultz, Todd Shaffer
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2015, 13 (3) 285-286; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1795

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
THE COUNCIL OF ACADEMIC FAMILY MEDICINE PROCEDURAL AND MATERNITY CARE TRAINING GUIDELINES: A BETTER PATH TO CONSISTENCY IN COMPETENCY ASSESSMENT IN FAMILY MEDICINE
W. Fred Miser, Michael Tuggy, Natasha Bhuyan, Gretchen M. Dickson, James W. Jarvis, Lisa Maxwell, Michael Mazzone, Tom Miller, Karen Mitchell, Stephen Schultz, Todd Shaffer
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2015, 13 (3) 285-286; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1795
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Departments

  • What do Primary Care Patients Want?
  • STFM Announces New Point of Care Ultrasound Task Force and Initiative on POCUS Family Medicine Education
  • Addressing Research Pathway Gaps: Insights from a Needs Assessment at the AAFP Future Conference
Show more Departments

Family Medicine Updates

  • New Advocacy Ambassadors Program Helps AAFP Members Engage With Their Legislators
  • STFM Announces New Point of Care Ultrasound Task Force and Initiative on POCUS Family Medicine Education
  • Addressing Research Pathway Gaps: Insights from a Needs Assessment at the AAFP Future Conference
Show more Family Medicine Updates

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine