Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
EditorialEditorial

Perspectives in Primary Care: Family Medicine in a Divided Nation

Max J. Romano and Kevin Grumbach
The Annals of Family Medicine January 2017, 15 (1) 4-6; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2025
Max J. Romano
Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, MedStar Franklin Square Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Mromano4@jhu.edu
Kevin Grumbach
Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  • family practice
  • healthcare disparities
  • racism
  • social class
  • politics

On November 8, 2016, family physicians went to work across the United States caring for patients. Some patients wore caps emblazoned “Make America Great Again” and others had buttons declaring “I’m With Her.” As on any other day, the task was to care for each patient with respect and dignity. On November 9, the country awoke to a new president-elect. Half of voters were excited by the promise of a new administration leading the nation toward a greater future, and half were fearful of what lay ahead.

We do not pretend that all family physicians share the same political ideology. But we do believe that in a nation seemingly so at odds, family medicine can help heal the divide. The months preceding the election exposed many wounds. Unemployed and underemployed workers in the Rust Belt decried the departure of well-paying jobs. Videos streamed images of police officers killing unarmed African American men, provoking public outrage and movements to confront institutional racism. Dallas, Baton Rouge, and other communities mourned the premeditated killing of unsuspecting police officers. Immigrants found heightened cause to fear that their families would be wrenched apart by deportations. Individuals denounced the rising cost of insurance in an era of supposed affordable care. A fractious campaign culminated in an election revealing deep schisms based on geography, race, ethnicity, social class, and religion. Whereas 88% of African Americans and two-thirds of Latinos and Asians voted for Hillary Clinton, exit polls indicate that 58% of whites voted for Donald Trump.1 Support for Trump was particularly high among whites without a college degree and among residents of rural communities. Highly educated city dwellers strongly preferred Clinton.

Although pundits portrayed the election as red state bigots versus entitled blue state elitists, family physicians see a more complex portrait of the nation’s diverse communities. Family doctors practice in communities reflecting the geographic distribution of the nation’s overall population more than physicians in other specialties. 2 They work on the front lines of US health care in remote rural towns, inner cities, and sprawling suburbs, caring for patients across a spectrum of social classes, races, and political persuasions. The work of primary care involves listening to patients’ stories, which affords insight into the complex mix of kindness, prejudice, generosity, frailty, decency, pain, and courage in every person. The task of family medicine is to partner with patients, families, and communities, acknowledging all their complexities, vulnerabilities, and strengths, to improve the nation’s health and well-being.

What does it mean to be a healthy society? Rarely has this question felt so urgent, and the answer so fragile. A powerful first step family physicians can take is to reject the false dichotomy that characterizes the nation as having a problem of either economic hardship or racial injustice. We have both. The United States lags behind other industrialized nations in indicators of population health. Much of the poor overall health of Americans is rooted in the underlying social and environmental conditions that powerfully influence health and illness.3 Since the 1970s, income inequality in the United States rose to levels not seen in America for the last century.4 These vulnerabilities are reflected in public health statistics showing a 3-year advantage in life expectancy for white Americans compared with African Americans.5 In addition, death rates among middle-aged whites increased from 1999 to 2013 after many decades of steady declines, with less-educated whites experiencing the largest increase.6 The past year exposed the grievances of many working-class Americans about a globalized, technology-driven economy that has left them behind and the outcry of people nationwide that Black Lives Matter.

The journey to a healthier nation cannot progress well over a terrain fractured by divisiveness and distrust. Family physicians have a duty to heal divisions and build bridges between the diverse communities in which they live and practice.

We propose that family physicians commit to 4 actions:

1. Address Bias

Patient-centered care requires recognizing and valuing every individual as unique. The election highlighted an abundance of misassumptions, biases, and tendencies to stereotype people across the political spectrum. Unconscious bias tests show that physicians hold implicit prejudices that influence the care they provide.7 We urge all family physicians to explore the roots of their bias by examining their privilege, fostering workplace conversations to address discrimination, and challenging institutions and policies that propagate implicit bias.

2. Model Inclusivity

Family medicine practices should be welcoming, inclusive, and safe places for patients, staff and trainees. Insisting on zero-tolerance for hostile work environments is not political partisanship. Modeling inclusivity also requires cultivating clinician leaders from diverse backgrounds underrepresented in our ranks. More than half of US medical students come from the wealthiest 20% of US households, and the number of African-American male students matriculating to US medical schools has declined from 1978 to 2014.8,9 We need to do better.

3. Attend to the Social Determinants of Health

A growing body of literature supports the feasibility and effectiveness of deploying interventions in the primary care clinical setting to address social determinants.10,11,12 Primary care practices should identify pragmatic steps to link patients to community resources. Health care payers implementing population-based payment models should support family physicians adopting these interventions. Medical professional organizations have affirmed that physicians must understand and address poverty to effectively care for their patients,13,14 but we need to further emphasize community strategies to tackle the “causes of the causes” driving poor health.15

4. Advocate for Health

Family medicine can lead by emphasizing health in a world of competing political priorities. This means advocating for patients beyond the clinic with civic institutions such as faith organizations, community associations, social clubs, and advocacy groups. As the nation debates the future of the Affordable Care Act, immigration policy, the federal tax code, and environmental regulations, family physicians must ensure that the agenda for our nation’s future includes a healthier and more equitable America.

Footnotes

  • Conflicts of interest: authors report none.

  • Received for publication November 24, 2016.
  • Revision received November 24, 2016.
  • Accepted for publication November 27, 2016.
  • © 2017 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Huang J,
    2. Jacoby S,
    3. Strickland M,
    4. Lai KKR
    . Election 2016: exit polls. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/11/08/us/politics/election-exit-polls.html. Published Nov 8, 2016. Accessed Nov 21, 2016.
  2. ↵
    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Primary care workforce facts and stats No. 3: prevention & chronic care program. AHRQ Pub No 12-P001-4-EF. http://www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/publications/files/pcwork3.pdf. Published Jan 2012. Accessed Nov 21, 2016.
  3. ↵
    Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. U.S. Health in International Perspective: Shorter Lives, Poorer Health. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2013. doi:10.17226/13497
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. ↵
    1. Saez E,
    2. Zucman G
    . Wealth inequality in the United States since 1913: Evidence from capitalized income tax data. Q J Econ. 2016;131(2):519–578.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Egerter S,
    2. Braveman P,
    3. Pamuk E,
    4. et al
    . America’s Health Starts with Healthy Children: How Do States Compare? Washington, DC: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Commission to Build a Healthier America; 2008.
  6. ↵
    1. Case A,
    2. Deaton A
    . Rising morbidity and mortality in midlife among white non-Hispanic Americans in the 21st century. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(49):15078–15083.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Chapman EN,
    2. Kaatz A,
    3. Carnes M
    . Physicians and implicit bias: how doctors may unwittingly perpetuate health care disparities. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28(11):1504–1510.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Jolly P
    . AAMC analysis in brief: diversity of U.S. medical students by parental income. Association of American Medical Colleges. https://www.aamc.org/download/102338/data/aibvol8no1.pdf. Published 2008. Accessed Nov 24, 2016.
  9. ↵
    Association of American Medical Colleges. Altering the course: black males in medicine. Association of American Medical Colleges. http://members.aamc.org/eweb/upload/Black_Males_in_Medicine_Report_WEB.pdf. Published 2015.
  10. ↵
    1. Gottlieb LM,
    2. Hessler D,
    3. Long D,
    4. et al
    . Effects of social needs screening and in-person service navigation on child health: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2016;170(11):e162521.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Lindau ST,
    2. Makelarski J,
    3. Abramsohn E,
    4. et al
    . CommunityRx: a population health improvement innovation that connects clinics to communities. Health Aff (Millwood). 2016;35(11):2020–2029.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. DeVoe JE,
    2. Bazemore AW,
    3. Cottrell EK,
    4. et al
    . Perspectives in primary care: a conceptual framework and path for integrating social determinants of health into primary care practice. Ann Fam Med. 2016;14(2):104–108.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    AAP Council on Community Pediatrics. Poverty and child health in the United States. Pediatrics. 2015;137(4):e20160339.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Czapp P,
    2. Kovach K
    . Poverty and health – the family medicine perspective (position paper). American Academy of Family Physicians. http://www.aafp.org/about/policies/all/policy-povertyhealth.html. Accessed Nov 15, 2016.
  15. ↵
    1. Braveman P,
    2. Gottlieb L
    . The social determinants of health: it’s time to consider the causes of the causes. Public Health Rep. 2014;129(Suppl 2):19–31.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 15 (1)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 15 (1)
Vol. 15, Issue 1
January/February 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Perspectives in Primary Care: Family Medicine in a Divided Nation
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
9 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Perspectives in Primary Care: Family Medicine in a Divided Nation
Max J. Romano, Kevin Grumbach
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2017, 15 (1) 4-6; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2025

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Perspectives in Primary Care: Family Medicine in a Divided Nation
Max J. Romano, Kevin Grumbach
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2017, 15 (1) 4-6; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2025
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • 1. Address Bias
    • 2. Model Inclusivity
    • 3. Attend to the Social Determinants of Health
    • 4. Advocate for Health
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • In This Issue: Powerful Ideas for Action
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Information Technology in Primary Care Screenings: Ready for Prime Time?
  • All Quality Metrics are Wrong; Some Quality Metrics Could Become Useful
  • The AI Moonshot: What We Need and What We Do Not
Show more Editorial

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • family practice
  • healthcare disparities
  • racism
  • social class
  • politics

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine