| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 Department of Family Medicine, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison, Wis
2 Private practice, Madison, Wis
3 Department of Family Medicine, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
4 Wisconsin Research Network (WReN), Madison, Wis
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: John W. Beasley, MD Department of Family Medicine University of Wisconsin Medical School 777 South Mills Street Madison, WI 53715 jbeasley{at}fammed.wisc.edu
PURPOSE The number of problems managed concurrently by family physicians during patient encounters has not been fully explored despite the implications for quality assessment, guideline implementation, education, research, administration, and funding. Our study objective was to determine the number of problems physicians report managing at each visit and compare that with the number reflected in the chart and the bill.
METHODS Twenty-nine members of the Wisconsin Research Network reported on encounters with 572 patients using a physician problem log. The patient chart notes and the diagnoses submitted for billing from the encounters were compared with the information in these logs.
RESULTS The physicians reported managing an average of 3.05 problems per encounter and recorded 2.82 in the chart and 1.97 on the bill. For all patients, 37% of encounters addressed more than 3 problems, and 18% addressed more than 4. For patients older than 65 years, there was an average of 3.88 problems at each visit, and for diabetic patients there was an average of 4.60. There was evidence for the selective omission of mental health and substance problems from the diagnoses used for billing.
CONCLUSIONS Family medicine involves the concurrent care of multiple problems, which billing data do not adequately reflect. Our findings suggest a mismatch between family medicine and current approaches to quality assessment, guideline implementation, education, research, administration, and funding. Activities in all these areas need to address the physician’s task of prioritizing and integrating care for multiple problems concurrently.
Key Words: Family medicine • family practice • comprehensive health care • documentation • professional practice • physician’s practice patterns • delivery of health care
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  T. C. Rosenthal The Medical Home: Growing Evidence to Support a New Approach to Primary Care J Am Board Fam Med, September 1, 2008; 21(5): 427 - 440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. A Bayliss, A. E Edwards, J. F Steiner, and D. S Main Processes of care desired by elderly patients with multimorbidities Fam. Pract., August 1, 2008; 25(4): 287 - 293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. B. Mauksch, D. C. Dugdale, S. Dodson, and R. Epstein Relationship, Communication, and Efficiency in the Medical Encounter: Creating a Clinical Model From a Literature Review Arch Intern Med, July 14, 2008; 168(13): 1387 - 1395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. D. Goodson Unintended Consequences of Resource-Based Relative Value Scale Reimbursement JAMA, November 21, 2007; 298(19): 2308 - 2310. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. W. Beasley, B. Starfield, C. van Weel, W. W. Rosser, and C. L. Haq Global Health and Primary Care Research J Am Board Fam Med, November 1, 2007; 20(6): 518 - 526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. C. Stange Is 'Clinical Inertia' Blaming Without Understanding? Are Competing Demands Excuses? Ann. Fam. Med, July 1, 2007; 5(4): 371 - 374. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. C. Stange In This Issue: Doctor-Patient and Drug Company-Patient Communication Ann. Fam. Med, January 1, 2007; 5(1): 2 - 4. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. J. Binns, D. Lanier, W. D. Pace, J. M. Galliher, T. G. Ganiats, M. Grey, A. J. Ariza, R. Williams, and for the Primary Care Network Survey (PRINS) Partic Describing Primary Care Encounters: The Primary Care Network Survey and the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey Ann. Fam. Med, January 1, 2007; 5(1): 39 - 47. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. MacGregor, M. Handley, S. Wong, C. Sharifi, K. Gjeltema, D. Schillinger, and T. Bodenheimer Behavior-change action plans in primary care: a feasibility study of clinicians. J Am Board Fam Med, May 1, 2006; 19(3): 215 - 223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Fortin, J. Dionne, G. Pinho, J. Gignac, J. Almirall, and L. Lapointe Randomized Controlled Trials: Do They Have External Validity for Patients With Multiple Comorbidities? Ann. Fam. Med, March 1, 2006; 4(2): 104 - 108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Bodenheimer, D. M. Young, K. MacGregor, and J. S. Holtrop Practice-Based Research in Primary Care: Facilitator of, or Barrier to, Practice Improvement? Ann. Fam. Med, July 1, 2005; 3(suppl_2): S28 - S32. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Ostbye, K. S. H. Yarnall, K. M. Krause, K. I. Pollak, M. Gradison, and J. L. Michener Is There Time for Management of Patients With Chronic Diseases in Primary Care? Ann. Fam. Med, May 1, 2005; 3(3): 209 - 214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. C. Stange In this Issue: The Patient-Clinician Relationship and Practice-Based Network Research Ann. Fam. Med, September 1, 2004; 2(5): 386 - 387. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
Read all TRACK Comments
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
