HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) TRACK Discussion: Submit a Comment TRACK Discussion: View Comments Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when TRACK Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by van Weel, C. Articles by Rosser, W. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by van Weel, C. Articles by Rosser, W. W. Related Collections Vulnerable populations Participatory / action research Health policy PBRN research Translational research Research capacity building Ethics

Improving Health Care Globally: A Critical Review of the Necessity of Family Medicine Research and Recommendations to Build Research Capacity

¹ Department of Family Medicine, University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
² Department of Family Medicine, Queens University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Chris van Weel, MD, PhD, FRCGP, Department of Family Medicine, University Medical Centre Nijmegen, 229-HAG, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands, C.vanWeel{at}HAG.umcn.nl

An invitational conference led by the World Organization of Family Doctors (Wonca) involving selected delegates from 34 countries was held in Kingston, Ontario, Canada, March 8 to12, 2003. The conference theme was "Improving Health Globally: The Necessity of Family Medicine Research." Guiding conference discussions was the value that to improve health care worldwide, strong, evidence-based primary care is indispensable. Eight papers reviewed before the meeting formed the basic material from which the conference developed 9 recommendations. Wonca, as an international body of family medicine, was regarded as particularly suited to pursue these conference recommendations:

1. Research achievements in family medicine should be displayed to policy makers, health (insurance) authorities, and academic leaders in a systematic way.
   
2. In all countries, sentinel practice systems should be developed to provide surveillance reports on illness and diseases that have the greatest impact on the population’s health and wellness in the community.
   
3. A clearinghouse should be organized to provide a central repository of knowledge about family medicine research expertise, training, and mentoring.
   
4. National research institutes and university departments of family medicine with a research mission should be developed.
   
5. Practice-based research networks should be developed around the world.
   
6. Family medicine research journals, conferences, and Web sites should be strengthened to disseminate research findings internationally, and their use coordinated. Improved representation of family medicine research journals in databases, such as Index Medicus, should be pursued.
   
7. Funding of international collaborative research in family medicine should be facilitated.
   
8. International ethical guidelines, with an international ethical review process, should be developed in particular for participatory (action) research, where researchers work in partnership with communities.
   
9. When implementing these recommendations, the specific needs and implications for developing countries should be addressed.
   

The Wonca executive committee has reviewed these recommendations and the supporting rationale for each. They plan to follow the recommendations, but to do so will require the support and cooperation of many individuals, organizations, and national governments around the world.

Key Words: Family practice • general practice • research development • capacity building, world health

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. C. Lucan, R. L. Phillips Jr, and A. W. Bazemore Off the Roadmap? Family Medicine's Grant Funding and Committee Representation at NIH Ann. Fam. Med, November 1, 2008; 6(6): 534 - 542. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. M. Tierney, C. C. Oppenheimer, B. L. Hudson, J. Benz, A. Finn, J. M. Hickner, D. Lanier, and D. S. Gaylin A National Survey of Primary Care Practice-Based Research Networks Ann. Fam. Med, May 1, 2007; 5(3): 242 - 250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. C. Livingood, J. Goldhagen, W. L. Little, J. Gornto, and T. Hou Assessing the Status of Partnerships Between Academic Institutions and Public Health Agencies Am J Public Health, April 1, 2007; 97(4): 659 - 666. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. L. van Driel, A. De Sutter, M. Deveugele, W. Peersman, C. C. Butler, M. De Meyere, J. De Maeseneer, and T. Christiaens Are Sore Throat Patients Who Hope for Antibiotics Actually Asking for Pain Relief? Ann. Fam. Med, November 1, 2006; 4(6): 494 - 499. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. van Weel and W. W Rosser Unquoted, unchallenged, general practice research will be casting pearls before swine Fam. Pract., October 1, 2005; 22(5): 471 - 473. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Mendis and I. Solangaarachchi PubMed perspective of family medicine research: where does it stand? Fam. Pract., October 1, 2005; 22(5): 570 - 575. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. H. Krist, S. H. Woolf, S. F. Rothemich, R. E. Johnson, and D. B. Wilson It Takes a Partnership: The Value of Collaboration in Developing and Promoting a Web Site for Primary Care Patients Ann. Fam. Med, July 1, 2005; 3(suppl_2): S47 - S49. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. van Weel Longitudinal Research and Data Collection in Primary Care Ann. Fam. Med, May 1, 2005; 3(suppl_1): S46 - S51. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. C. Stange Questions, Interpretation, Exhortation Ann. Fam. Med, September 1, 2004; 2(5): 514 - 517. [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. W. Rosser and C. van Weel Research in Family/General Practice is Essential for Improving Health Globally Ann. Fam. Med, May 1, 2004; 2(suppl_2): S2 - S4. [Full Text] [PDF]

TRACK Comments: