|
|
||||||||
Essay |
Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Auckland, Auckland, NZ
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Stephen A. Buetow, PhD, Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, NZ 1004, s.buetow{at}auckland.ac.nz
ABSTRACT
Although primary care, including family medicine, recognizes different types of clinician-patient interaction, I argue that only interactions characterized by coprovision define care. By coprovision I mean that clinicians and patients each provide the expertise in health care that they have the capacity to contribute in any given situation. I argue that paternalism and consumerism cannot signify care in any real sense. Some implications of this analysis include a reconceptualization of family medicine and its defining attributes; support for features of caring relationships, such as mutual responsiveness and responsibility; and an acknowledgment that clinicians and patients need to be self-regarding as well as other-regarding. In a previous issue of the Annals, I called for a new dictionary for family medicine, one that would redefine attributes of family medicine in ways not exclusively clinician-centric. Specifically, it would acknowledge the role of patients and their informal caregivers as coproviding, not merely consuming, health care.
Key Words: Delivery of health care physician-patient relations health services research professional practice
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Soubhi Toward an Ecosystemic Approach to Chronic Care Design and Practice in Primary Care Ann. Fam. Med, May 1, 2007; 5(3): 263 - 269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. C. Stange In This Issue: Trade-Offs, Time Use, Depression Care Ann. Fam. Med, November 1, 2005; 3(6): 482 - 483. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
Read all TRACK Comments
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |