Annals Journal Club: Medical Assistants Role in Improving Preventive and Chronic Illness Care
The Annals of Family Medicine encourages readers to developa learning community of those seeking to improve health careand health through enhanced primary care. You can participateby conducting a RADICAL journal club and sharing the resultsof your discussions in the Annals online discussion for thefeatured articles. RADICAL is an acronym for Read, Ask, Discuss,Inquire, Collaborate, Act, and Learn. The word radical alsoindicates the need to engage diverse participants in thinkingcritically about important issues affecting primary care andthen acting on those discussions.1
In each issue, the Annals selects an article or articles andprovides discussion tips and questions. We encourage you totake a RADICAL approach to these materials and to post a summaryof your conversation in our online discussion. (Open the articleonline and click on "TRACK Comments: Submit a response.") Youcan find discussion questions and more information online at:http://www.AnnFamMed.org/AJC/.
Ferrer RL, Mody-Bailey P, Jaén CR, Gott S, Araujo S.A medical assistant-based program to promote health behaviorsin primary care. Ann Fam Med. 2009; 7(6):504–512.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
GensichenJS, Jaeger C, Peitz M, et al. Health care assistantsin primarycare depression management: role perception, burdeningfactors,and disease conception. Ann Fam Med. 2009; 7(6):513–519.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Of the 417,000 medical assistants active in the United Statesin 2006, 62% worked in physician offices.2 Similar roles existin other countries. Duties vary but typically are limited tomedical care support functions. These 2 articles are relevantto efforts to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of teamapproaches to primary care by expanding the role of medicalassistants. The articles present complementary but contrastingperspectives of chronic illness and preventive care, qualitativeand quantitative methods, and US and German social and healthcare system contexts.
What questions are addressed by these articles? How do the questionsfit with what already is known on this topic?
What is therelevance of the research questions for the currenteconomic,practice improvement, and health care system reformefforts?
How strong are the study designs for answering the questions?
To what degree can the findings be accounted for by:
How participantswere selected?
How outcomes were measured?
Confounding (falseattribution of causality because 2 variablesdiscovered to beassociated actually are associated with a 3rdfactor)?
Researcherbias?
Chance?
What are the main findings?
To what extentdo the characteristics of the person performingthe expandedrole affect how well things work? What evidencedo these articlesgive to support or refute your opinion?
How comparable arethe study populations to your practice? Whatis your judgmentabout the transportability of the findings?
How (if at all)could these studies change your practice?
What important researchablequestions remain?
What are the implications of the findingsfor practice improvementand health care reform?
Medical assistants. In: Occupational Outlook Handbook, 2008–09 Edition. Bureau of Labor Statistics. http://www.bls.gov/oco/ocos164.htm. Accessed Oct 14, 2009.