Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleMethodology

The 5 R’s: An Emerging Bold Standard for Conducting Relevant Research in a Changing World

C. J. Peek, Russell E. Glasgow, Kurt C. Stange, Lisa M. Klesges, E. Peyton Purcell and Rodger S. Kessler
The Annals of Family Medicine September 2014, 12 (5) 447-455; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1688
C. J. Peek
1Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: cjpeek@umn.edu
Russell E. Glasgow
2Department of Family Medicine and Colorado Health Outcomes Program, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kurt C. Stange
3Department of Family Medicine & Community Health, Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, and Department of Sociology, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinical & Translational Science Collaborative, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lisa M. Klesges
4School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E. Peyton Purcell
5Clinical Research Directorate/CMRP, SAIC-Frederick, Inc, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rodger S. Kessler
6Department of Family Medicine and the Center for Clinical and Translational Science, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont
PhD, ABPP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Research often fails to find its way into practice or policy in a timely way, if at all. Given the current pressure and pace of health care change, many authors have recommended different approaches to make health care research more relevant and rapid. An emerging standard for research, the “5 R’s” is a synthesis of recommendations for care delivery research that (1) is relevant to stakeholders; (2) is rapid and recursive in application; (3) redefines rigor; (4) reports on resources required; and (5) is replicable. Relevance flows from substantive ongoing participation by stakeholders. Rapidity and recursiveness occur through accelerated design and peer reviews followed by short learning/implementation cycles through which questions and answers evolve over time. Rigor is the disciplined conduct of shared learning within the specific changing situations in diverse settings. Resource reporting includes costs of interventions. Replicability involves designing for the factors that may affect subsequent implementation of an intervention or program in different contexts. These R’s of the research process are mutually reinforcing and can be supported by training that fosters collaborative and reciprocal relationships among researchers, implementers, and other stakeholders. In sum, a standard is emerging for research that is both rigorous and relevant. Consistent and bold application will increase the value, timeliness, and applicability of the research enterprise.

  • research design
  • healthcare research
  • evaluation research
  • partnership research
  • rapid research
  • Received for publication July 17, 2013.
  • Revision received May 13, 2014.
  • Accepted for publication June 2, 2014.
  • © 2014 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 12 (5)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 12 (5)
Vol. 12, Issue 5
September/October 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • The Issue in Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The 5 R’s: An Emerging Bold Standard for Conducting Relevant Research in a Changing World
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
14 + 4 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
The 5 R’s: An Emerging Bold Standard for Conducting Relevant Research in a Changing World
C. J. Peek, Russell E. Glasgow, Kurt C. Stange, Lisa M. Klesges, E. Peyton Purcell, Rodger S. Kessler
The Annals of Family Medicine Sep 2014, 12 (5) 447-455; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1688

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
The 5 R’s: An Emerging Bold Standard for Conducting Relevant Research in a Changing World
C. J. Peek, Russell E. Glasgow, Kurt C. Stange, Lisa M. Klesges, E. Peyton Purcell, Rodger S. Kessler
The Annals of Family Medicine Sep 2014, 12 (5) 447-455; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1688
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • THE NEED FOR RELEVANT RESEARCH IN A RAPIDLY CHANGING HEALTH CARE WORLD
    • THE 5 R’S OF HEALTH CARE DELIVERY RESEARCH
    • EXAMPLES
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Cost-effectiveness of support for health professionals to implement physical activity promotion: a protocol for within-trial and modelled economic evaluations of the PROMOTE-PA effectiveness-implementation hybrid trial
  • Looking Back to Move Forward: Reflections of PBRN Directors
  • Harmonizing the Tripartite Mission in Academic Family Medicine: A Longitudinal Case Example
  • Getting started in research, redefined: five questions for clinically focused physicians in family medicine
  • Unfinished Business: The Role of Research in Family Medicine
  • Mapping Evidence of Patients Experiences in Integrated Care Settings: A Protocol for a Scoping Review
  • The Rise of Primary Care Physicians in the Provision of US Mental Health Care
  • How to Enter the Clinical Research Field
  • In This Issue: Raise the Gaze
  • Could 5R Research Help Achieve the Triple Aim?
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Joint Display of Integrated Data Collection for Mixed Methods Research: An Illustration From a Pediatric Oncology Quality Improvement Study
  • Patient-Guided Tours: A Patient-Centered Methodology to Understand Patient Experiences of Health Care
  • Putting Evidence Into Practice: An Update on the US Preventive Services Task Force Methods for Developing Recommendations for Preventive Services
Show more Methodology

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Methods:
    • Participatory / action research
  • Other research types:
    • Health policy
    • PBRN research
    • Translational research
  • Other topics:
    • Research capacity building

Keywords

  • research design
  • healthcare research
  • evaluation research
  • partnership research
  • rapid research

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine