Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
NewsFamily Medicine UpdatesF

LESSONS LEARNED FROM REBUILDING A PRIMARY CARE INFRASTRUCTURE: A CANADIAN PERSPECTIVE

The Annals of Family Medicine November 2011, 9 (6) 559-560; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1328

The Canadian health care system began to crumble in the 1990s after its foundation, primary care, had been neglected for more than 2 decades. Canada has spent the last decade trying to fix the problem and restore and strengthen its primary care system. While there is much work left to be done, much has been accomplished. Here are a few pearls of wisdom learned along the way and what is still in the works to bring primary care back to the core of the Canadian health care system.

1. Don’t Think Your System is Always the Best

Policy-makers and the health care establishment were inattentive to the weakening of the Canadian primary care infrastructure. Physicians in training were increasingly choosing specialties over family practice to be able to pay off their student loans.1 As a result, first contact with the medical system for many patients became emergency departments and walk-in clinics since many Canadians could not find a family doctor. Our specialist colleagues were being asked by patients to do the job of family doctors. These were just a few symptoms of a sick system that needed some serious attention.

2. The Solution of Simply Spending More Money is Unsustainable

Despite huge amounts of money being thrown at the Canadian system, international reports indicated that Canada was losing ground among industrialized nations in terms of the quality of primary care. Countries that had invested in their primary care systems were well ahead of Canada—even after spending fewer resources.2,3

3. Spending the Majority of Resources on Health Systems, Hospitals, and Specialties is Not the Answer

Provincial governments expanded emergency rooms and funded more specialists, while primary care slowly continued to crumble. Quadrupling the size of emergency departments and not spending any money on the primary care sector did not solve the problem. The cost of caring for patients in the emergency departments far exceeded the cost of delivering primary care yet the quality of care was inferior.

4. Establish Measures of Performance for the Primary Care Sector

The quality of care in hospitals was the focus of public debate since there were few decent measures of performance of the primary care sector.

5. Fix Primary Care First; Then Put Money Into the Rest of the System

International research shows that countries that invest in primary care as the foundation of their health care system have better outcomes: their citizens live longer and have a better quality of life.4

6. The System Needs to Be in Balance

Primary care physicians need to be the cornerstone of the health care system. They need to care for the whole patient, not just a single condition. Specialists cannot be specialists without this balance. The other components of the health care system depend on a solid and stable primary care foundation.

7. Significant Investment in Reforming the Primary Care Sector is Necessary

In the past 10 years, Canada has spent hundreds of millions of dollars to reform the primary care sector, including: electronic health records (EHRs), blended systems of remuneration for family doctors, multidisciplinary teams, and requirements for accountability.

8. Research Ensures the Money Has Been Well Spent

We must study the effects of our financial investments, compare results among communities, and examine the data on patient outcomes.5

The Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) convened a 2-day summit in 2010 with key stakeholders to discuss the state of primary care research nationally and internationally, and to explore new applications for Canada. In 2011, CIHR initiated a 10-year research plan that can not only support the delivery of high-quality, community-based, primary health care across Canada, but also build a strong, evidence-based research capacity and infrastructure.6

Canadian PHC researchers have come together to form the Canadian Primary Health Care Research Network that will coordinate Canadian research efforts and work toward enhancing the quality, access and cost-effectiveness of Canada’s health care system.

9. Technology and Innovation Are Keys to Success

Modern information technology tools and new analytical techniques will unlock our understanding of what makes primary health care effective and inform us of what is needed to improve the quality and cost effectiveness of the entire health care system.

Footnotes

  • This article was adapted by Joan Hedgecock, MSPH, NAPCRG Member Services Manager, and Kristin Robinson, NAPCRG Public Relations Specialist, from an original manuscript by William Hogg, MSc, MClSc, MD, CM, FCFP, Professor and Senior Research Advisor in the Department of Family Medicine at the University of Ottawa and C.T. Lamont Primary Health Care Research Centre of the Élisabeth Bruyère Research Institute in Ottawa, Ontario. The article is printed here with permission granted by the Canadian Family Physician. The citation for the original article is: Hogg W. Rebuilding the primary care infrastructure one research project at a time.

  • © 2011 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.

References

  1. Canadian Resident Matching Service. 2002 R-1 Match reports: history of family medicine as the career choice of Canadian graduates. 2002. http://www.carms.ca/eng/operations_R1reports_02_e.shtml#table7.
    1. Starffield B
    . Primary Care: Balancing Health Needs, Services and Technology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1998.
    1. Starffield B,
    2. Shi L,
    3. Macinko J
    . Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. Milbank Q. 2005;83(3):457–502.
    1. Davis K,
    2. Schoen C,
    3. Stremikis K
    . Mirror, mirror on the wall: how the performance of the US health care system compares internationally, 2010 update. Commonwealth Fund Report. 2010.
    1. Starffield B
    . Primary care in Canada: coming or going? Healthc Pap. 2008;8(2):58–62, discussion 64–67.
  2. CIHR Roadmap Signature Initiative in Community-Based Primary Healthcare. 2011. http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/43249.html.

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine