Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
NewsFamily Medicine UpdatesF

Meeting on Patient Safety Takes Different Tack: Ambulatory Care

The Annals of Family Medicine November 2003, 1 (4) 248-249;
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

When the Institute of Medicine (IOM) concluded in its groundbreaking 1999 report, “To Err Is Human,” that the know-how already existed to prevent many medical errors, it struck a chord among all health care professionals.1 That chord resounded loud and clear for primary care physicians.

Granted, the IOM report looked mainly at hospital-based errors, but the content of the report has led to much soul-searching among those who practice ambulatory care. Many primary care physicians have come to the same conclusion, namely, that office-based practices have flaws in their systems of care that work to the detriment of patients.

FIRST OF ITS KIND

Concern about medical errors gave impetus to the first National Ambulatory Primary Care Research and Education Conference on Patient Safety held September 18–19, 2003, in Chicago. The AAFP was a sponsor of the conference.

Whereas many meetings have been held on the topic of patient safety, this was the first national gathering devoted solely to safety in ambulatory primary care settings.

“We hope that the content and format of this unique meeting will lead to stimulating discussions, new alliances, collaborations and program developments lasting long after we’re adjourned,” said John Hickner, MD, MS, conference chair and director of the AAFP National Network for Family Practice and Primary Care Research.

With sufficient interest among participants, the event could become an annual meeting for those seeking to improve primary medical care delivery through research and education, said Hickner.

Recognizing that medical errors are a problem for all physicians in primary care, the meeting’s planning committee included leaders in internal medicine and pediatric medicine in addition to leaders in family medicine.

The meeting, supported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), arose from discussions among members of the Primary Care Organizations Consortium and staff of the AAFP Developmental Center for Research and Evaluation in Patient Safety in Primary Care (DCERPS-PC).

TOOLS ARE THERE

Sessions included presentations on error reporting and disclosure, drug-to-drug interactions and interventions, and patient safety curricula for medical schools and residency programs.

A frequent refrain at the meeting, however, was the notion that health care professionals could use existing knowledge to improve safety.

In her keynote address, Helen Burstin, MD, MPH, director of the AHRQ Center for Primary Care Research, spoke of the importance of information technology for patient safety.

“The IOM noted in its report that grocery stores have better technology than doctors,” she said, expressing the hope that physicians will soon make use of such technology as bar codes and computerized records.

KEY TO PATIENT SAFETY: PATIENTS

Plenary speaker Gerald Hickson, MD, associate dean for clinical affairs at Vanderbilt University, predicted that his role as a malpractice researcher would do little to win friends in medical practice. But lawsuits offer clues on how to improve the medical system, he said. His research has shown that regardless of specialty, relatively few physicians—9%—account for roughly half of complaints.

“We need patients to be our partners,” he said. “Our colleagues who are disruptive don’t promote that.”

And even when a lawsuit is dismissed, it offers a lesson, Hickson said. “Poor communicators are sued more often.”

He added, “There’s been much said about the tip of the iceberg. The unsolicited patient complaint is the iceberg. For every one who complains, 30 will not.”

His point? Physicians should not stand by silently while a colleague provides bad care. And this idea needs to be implanted early on. Medical students and residents should be trained to provide feedback to their colleagues.

WHAT ENGINEERS CAN TEACH PRIMARY CARE

Are primary care physicians just not system-oriented? Are they laboring in faulty structures but blind to the fact?

One industrial engineer who attended the conference thinks so. “Maybe it’s time to bring people in from an outside perspective and look at the situation from a design point of view,” said Ben-Tzion Karsh, PhD, an industrial engineer from the University of Wisconsin-Madison who specializes in health care settings.

“We talk too much about errors, not about hazards in design,” he said.

What he sees in health care is an information-rich field in which doctors must weigh data coming from many sources: written history, test results, patients and family members.

And although paper charts are fraught with hazards, electronic medical records are not an automatic solution if they are not customized to a specific practice, Karsh said.

From what enterprise could health care professionals learn?

“UPS,” he said. The shipping company has engineered a business design in which the shipping of packages can be tracked with pinpoint accuracy throughout the world.

And although no one is arguing that patients are like packages, the concept presents an example of using tried-and-true technology.

WANT TO LEARN MORE?

The proceedings of the National Ambulatory Primary Care Research and Education Conference on Patient Safety will be published online this winter on the AAFP DCERPS-PC Web site (http://www.aafp.org/ptsafety.xml).

Toni Lapp

AAFP News Department

  • © 2003 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.

REFERENCE

  1. ↵
    Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, Eds. To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 1 (4)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 1 (4)
Vol. 1, Issue 4
1 Nov 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • [Annual Indexes, 2003]
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Meeting on Patient Safety Takes Different Tack: Ambulatory Care
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Meeting on Patient Safety Takes Different Tack: Ambulatory Care
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2003, 1 (4) 248-249;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Meeting on Patient Safety Takes Different Tack: Ambulatory Care
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2003, 1 (4) 248-249;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • FIRST OF ITS KIND
    • TOOLS ARE THERE
    • KEY TO PATIENT SAFETY: PATIENTS
    • WHAT ENGINEERS CAN TEACH PRIMARY CARE
    • WANT TO LEARN MORE?
    • REFERENCE
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Support for the WHO Resolution on Social Participation
  • Resident Leadership Roles and Selection
  • New Advocacy Ambassadors Program Helps AAFP Members Engage With Their Legislators
Show more Family Medicine Updates

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine