Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Meeting ReportScreening, prevention, and health promotion

Evaluation of fluoride varnish implementation for well child visits in a family practice residency clinic

Jessica Kram, Dennis Baumgardner, Catherine de Grandville, Madelyn Pickle, Fabiana Kotovicz, Carl Bellinger, Melissa Grube, Kristin Randa and Marianne Klumph
The Annals of Family Medicine April 2022, 20 (Supplement 1) 2644; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.20.s1.2644
Jessica Kram
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dennis Baumgardner
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Catherine de Grandville
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Madelyn Pickle
DO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fabiana Kotovicz
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carl Bellinger
DO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Melissa Grube
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kristin Randa
DO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marianne Klumph
MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Context: Dental decay is the most common chronic disease in children, with racial minorities and children living in poverty having the highest prevalence. Dental fluoride varnish, a protective coating painted on teeth to help prevent caries, requires no special equipment and can be applied in <2 minutes. Per the USPSTF and American Academy of Pediatrics, dental varnish application should be considered every 3-6 months during well child exams.

Objective: Evaluate incorporation of fluoride varnish applications in well child visits.

Study Design: Mixed-methods.

Setting: Two residency clinics in Milwaukee, WI.

Population studied: 6 month - 6 year well child visits, pre/post-provider survey.

Intervention: Dental varnish application protocol was implemented in July–Sept. 2019. All providers completed the STFM Smiles for Life Module 6.

Outcome measures: Pre/post-surveys were conducted to identify provider’s opinions including importance, sustainability, and barriers to implementation of a dental varnish protocol. Well child visit data from 7/1/19 1/15/20 (period 1) and 1/16/20 - 12/31/20 (period 2; representing COVID pandemic) was compared for both clinics regarding rates of preventative visits with fluoride dental varnish applied. A Z-test for Equality of Two Proportions was used to compare rates. Pre/post-survey answers were analyzed using 2-sample T–tests.

Results: 1,984 well child visits in study period; 369 (19%) with varnish application. During period 1, 25% of visits at clinic 1 and 16% of visits at clinic 2 included a varnish application. There was no significant difference in application rates between periods (clinic 1=22% visits and clinic 2=15%). During the Covid-19 pandemic varnish applications decreased from 18.6 to 8.1 per month at clinic 1 (p<0.01), but increased from 12.5 to 15.2 per month at clinic 2 (p=0.18). Our pre/post-surveys identified the same barriers to application (not enough training/time, unsure where to find supplies). Except for percentage of eligible patients seen for well child exams including fluoride varnish (63% v. 35% p<0.01), no other survey responses were significantly different.

Conclusions: Dental fluoride varnish application can be successfully implemented into academic primary care clinics to reach children most at risk, but not without challenges. Results of further surveys can be used to streamline protocols for sustainability. Optimized processes may be adapted by others to decrease health disparities.

  • © 2021 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 20 (Supplement 1)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 20 (Supplement 1)
Vol. 20, Issue Supplement 1
1 Apr 2022
  • Table of Contents
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluation of fluoride varnish implementation for well child visits in a family practice residency clinic
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
6 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Evaluation of fluoride varnish implementation for well child visits in a family practice residency clinic
Jessica Kram, Dennis Baumgardner, Catherine de Grandville, Madelyn Pickle, Fabiana Kotovicz, Carl Bellinger, Melissa Grube, Kristin Randa, Marianne Klumph
The Annals of Family Medicine Apr 2022, 20 (Supplement 1) 2644; DOI: 10.1370/afm.20.s1.2644

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Evaluation of fluoride varnish implementation for well child visits in a family practice residency clinic
Jessica Kram, Dennis Baumgardner, Catherine de Grandville, Madelyn Pickle, Fabiana Kotovicz, Carl Bellinger, Melissa Grube, Kristin Randa, Marianne Klumph
The Annals of Family Medicine Apr 2022, 20 (Supplement 1) 2644; DOI: 10.1370/afm.20.s1.2644
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Cervical Cancer Screening Differences Between Black and White Women: An Examination of HPV and Pap Test Utilization.
  • Understanding the Relationship Between Social Needs and Cervical Cancer Screening
  • Accelerated biological aging leads to the trajectory of cardiometabolic multimorbidity to dementia and mortality
Show more Screening, prevention, and health promotion

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine