Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Meeting ReportPractice management and organization

Defining and measuring primary care panels: A systematic review

Michael Mayo-Smith
The Annals of Family Medicine April 2022, 20 (Supplement 1) 2954; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.20.s1.2954
Michael Mayo-Smith
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

CONTEXT: Empanelment, assigning individual patients to primary care providers (PCP), is a building block of primary care (PC). Panel size plays increasing role in determining workload, capacity, and pay. Marked differences exist in reported panels, from <500 to >5000. Variation in rules used to define panels may contribute to these differences, but data on current practices are lacking

OBJECTIVE: Identify a) methods used to define and measure panels by researchers and health care systems (HCS) and b) research on strengths/weaknesses of specific approaches.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic Review

DATASET: Search of 4 databases from inception to 4/28/21 and Google grey literature search with review of article list & structured data extraction in duplicate

ARTICLES: 93 articles which included description of rules to define panel

OUTCOME MEASURES: Frequency with which HSC or researchers used specific practices for defining panels

RESULTS: Panel Assignment: 25 assigned patients if seen at least once, 3 required 2 visits and 3 HMOs assigned upon enrollment in health plan. Duration without visit to inactivate: varied from 12 months (5 HCS), 18 months (9), 24 months (5) and 36 months (8). 2 HMOs inactivated patients when they left health plan. Frequency of updating panels: 1 HCS updated 2x/month, 8 monthly, 2 quarterly and 2 annually. Advanced Practice Providers (APP): some HSC included patients seen by APPs in physician panels, others assigned them independent panels. 2 surveys of PC NPs found 45% & 64% had independent panels. Adjusting panel size for part time practice: in 33 studies where panel size was a variable in multivariate analysis 18(55%) of articles did not adjust panel size for part time practice. Research on strengths and weaknesses of specific approaches: no published research was located.

CONCUSIONS: Great variation exists in rules used to define and measure panels. This may be contributing to the enormous variation in reported panel sizes. Caution is needed comparing reports across articles and organizations. Research on best method to define and measure panels is needed and could contribute to an evidence-based, standard approach.

  • © 2021 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 20 (Supplement 1)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 20 (Supplement 1)
Vol. 20, Issue Supplement 1
1 Apr 2022
  • Table of Contents
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Defining and measuring primary care panels: A systematic review
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Defining and measuring primary care panels: A systematic review
Michael Mayo-Smith
The Annals of Family Medicine Apr 2022, 20 (Supplement 1) 2954; DOI: 10.1370/afm.20.s1.2954

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Defining and measuring primary care panels: A systematic review
Michael Mayo-Smith
The Annals of Family Medicine Apr 2022, 20 (Supplement 1) 2954; DOI: 10.1370/afm.20.s1.2954
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Understanding Primary Care Inbox Management: A Qualitative Study of Patient Message Prioritization and Inbox Workflow
  • Using a typology to understand and address primary care administrative workload in Atlantic Canada
  • Advancing Primary Care through a Model Unit for Innovative Practice Enhancement
Show more Practice management and organization

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine