Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Meeting ReportGeriatrics

Assessing Frailty in Clinical Trials for Dementia or Cognitive Impairment

Peter Hanlon, Heather Wightman, Terence Quinn and Frances Mair
The Annals of Family Medicine January 2023, 21 (Supplement 1) 3717; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.21.s1.3717
Peter Hanlon
MBChB, MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Heather Wightman
BSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Terence Quinn
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frances Mair
MD, FRCGP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Context: Frailty is a state in which physiological reserve is depleted across multiple systems, leading to an increased risk of decompensation in response to stressor events. Frailty is a risk factor for dementia and complicates its management. However, frailty is rarely reported in clinical trials for dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) which limits assessment of trial applicability.

Objective: This analysis will assess the feasibility of using a frailty index (FI) and individual participant data (IPD) to measure frailty in clinical trials for MCI and dementia. It will assess the prevalence of frailty and its association with serious adverse events (SAEs) and trial attrition.

Study design: Secondary analysis of IPD from randomised controlled trials.

Dataset: IPD from trials for dementia (n=1) or MCI (n=2).

Population: Trial participants were analysed at baseline (dementia trial n=408, MCI trials n=987 and n=1064).

Instrument: Two FIs were created, one based exclusively on physical deficits, the other based on physical and cognitive deficits.

Outcomes: Frailty prevalence (FI>0.24) was assessed along with the distribution of the FI in each trial. The relationship between FI and SAEs and trial attrition were assessed using Poisson and logistic regression, respectively. Estimates were pooled in random effects meta-analysis. Analyses were adjusted for age and sex.

Results: The mean physical FI was 0.13 and 0.14 in the MCI trials and 0.25 in the dementia trial. Frailty prevalence (FI>0.24) was 5.1%, 5.4% in MCI trials and 55.6% in dementia. After including cognitive deficits, prevalence was similar in MCI (4.6% and 4.9%) but higher in dementia (80.7%). 99th percentile (0.29 in MCI, 0.44 in dementia) of FI was lower than in most general population studies. Frailty was associated with SAEs (physical FI IRR = 1.63 [1.43, 1.87]; physical/cognitive FI IRR = 1.67 [1.45, 1.93]). Frailty was not associated with trial attrition (physical FI OR = 1.18 [0.92, 1.53]; physical/cognitive FI OR = 1.17 [0.92, 1.49]).

Conclusion: Measuring frailty from baseline IPD in dementia and MCI trials is feasible. Those living with more severe frailty may be under-represented. Frailty is associated with clinically significant outcomes. Including only physical deficits may underestimate frailty in dementia. Frailty can and should be measured in future and existing trials for dementia and MCI, and efforts should be made to facilitate inclusion of people living with frailty.

  • © 2023 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 21 (Supplement 1)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 21 (Supplement 1)
Vol. 21, Issue Supplement 1
1 Jan 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Assessing Frailty in Clinical Trials for Dementia or Cognitive Impairment
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Assessing Frailty in Clinical Trials for Dementia or Cognitive Impairment
Peter Hanlon, Heather Wightman, Terence Quinn, Frances Mair
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2023, 21 (Supplement 1) 3717; DOI: 10.1370/afm.21.s1.3717

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Assessing Frailty in Clinical Trials for Dementia or Cognitive Impairment
Peter Hanlon, Heather Wightman, Terence Quinn, Frances Mair
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2023, 21 (Supplement 1) 3717; DOI: 10.1370/afm.21.s1.3717
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • A Novel Definition of Urinary Tract Infection across a National Primary Care Network
  • Describing family physicians with 'Care of the Elderly' added training or focused practice: A retrospective cohort study
  • I Could Do Much Better but the System Doesn’t Allow Me
Show more Geriatrics

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine