Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Meeting ReportBig data

Assessing Representativeness of Randomised Controlled Trials using Serious Adverse Events

Peter Hanlon, Sofia Dias, David McAllister, Sarah Wild, Frances Mair, Bruce Guthrie, Elaine Butterly, Nicky Welton and Laurie Hannigan
The Annals of Family Medicine January 2023, 21 (Supplement 1) 3730; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.21.s1.3730
Peter Hanlon
MBChB, MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sofia Dias
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David McAllister
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah Wild
PhD, MB BChir, MRCGP, FRCPE, FFPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frances Mair
MD, FRCGP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bruce Guthrie
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elaine Butterly
MBChB
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicky Welton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laurie Hannigan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Context: The applicability of randomised controlled trials of pharmacological agents to older people with frailty/multimorbidity is often uncertain, due to concerns that trials are not representative. However, assessing trial representativeness is challenging and complex.

Objectives: We explore an approach assessing trial representativeness by comparing rates of trial Serious Adverse Events (SAEs: most of which reflect hospitalisations/deaths) to rates of hospitalisation/death in routine care (which, in a trial setting, would be SAEs be definition).

Study design: Secondary analysis of trial and routine healthcare data. Dataset and population: 483 trials (n=636,267) from clinicaltrials.gov across 21 index conditions. A routine care comparison was identified from SAIL databank (n=2.3M).

Instrument: SAIL data were used to derive the expected rate of hospitalisations/deaths by age, sex and index condition.

Outcomes: We calculated the expected number of SAEs for each trial compared to the observed number of SAEs (observed/expected SAE ratio). We then re-calculated the observed/expected SAE ratio additionally accounting for comorbidity count in 125 trials for which we accessed individual participant data.

Results: For 12/21 index conditions the observed/expected SAE ratio was <1, indicating fewer SAEs in trials than expected given community rates of hospitalisations and deaths. A further 6/21 had point estimates <1 but the 95% CI included the null. The median observed/expected SAE ratio was 0.60 (95% CI 0.56-0.65; COPD) and the interquartile range was 0.44 (0.34-0.55; Parkinson’s disease) to 0.88 (0.59-1.33; IBD). Higher comorbidity count was associated with SAEs/hospitalisations and deaths across index conditions. For most trials, the observed/expected ratio was attenuated but remained <1 after additionally accounting for comorbidity count.

Conclusion: Trial participants experience fewer SAEs than expected based on age/sex/condition hospitalisation and death rates in routine care, confirming the predicted lack of representativeness. This difference is only partially explained by differences in multimorbidity. Assessing observed/expected SAE may help assess applicability of trial findings to older populations in whom multimorbidity and frailty are common.

  • © 2023 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 21 (Supplement 1)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 21 (Supplement 1)
Vol. 21, Issue Supplement 1
1 Jan 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Assessing Representativeness of Randomised Controlled Trials using Serious Adverse Events
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Assessing Representativeness of Randomised Controlled Trials using Serious Adverse Events
Peter Hanlon, Sofia Dias, David McAllister, Sarah Wild, Frances Mair, Bruce Guthrie, Elaine Butterly, Nicky Welton, Laurie Hannigan
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2023, 21 (Supplement 1) 3730; DOI: 10.1370/afm.21.s1.3730

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Assessing Representativeness of Randomised Controlled Trials using Serious Adverse Events
Peter Hanlon, Sofia Dias, David McAllister, Sarah Wild, Frances Mair, Bruce Guthrie, Elaine Butterly, Nicky Welton, Laurie Hannigan
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2023, 21 (Supplement 1) 3730; DOI: 10.1370/afm.21.s1.3730
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Implementation of a novel linkage of primary care electronic medical record data with hospital data in South Eastern Ontario
  • The association of medical and vaccination history with the development of long COVID
  • Validation of an Administrative Knee Osteoarthritis Severity Index in a Veterans Health Affairs Cohort
Show more Big data

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine