Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Meeting ReportDissemination and implementation research

Applying the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) in Acute Care and Primary Care Evaluations

Katherine O’Hare, Hazel Tapp, Lindsay Shade, Kelly Reeves, Melinda Manning, Jeremy Thomas, Cheryl Courtlandt, Rebecca Beesley, Diane Derkowski and Charity Patterson
The Annals of Family Medicine January 2023, 21 (Supplement 1) 3780; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.21.s1.3780
Katherine O’Hare
MSW
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hazel Tapp
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lindsay Shade
MHS, PA-C
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kelly Reeves
BSN, RN, UXC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Melinda Manning
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeremy Thomas
MSW
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cheryl Courtlandt
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rebecca Beesley
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Diane Derkowski
RN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charity Patterson
PhD, MSPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Context: Implementing new innovations into healthcare settings is challenging. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) can provide guidance on the design, implementation strategies, and evaluation processes. CFIR’s versatility offers several advantages: (1) promotes use of a shared language across diverse settings, (2) applicable at various stages of implementation, and (3) ability to map results to the Expert Recommendations for Implementation Change (ERIC) strategies to address barriers.

Objective: Here we describe three applications of CFIR for pre and post implementation evaluations.

Study Design: Descriptive Setting & Participants: Primary care practices and pediatric emergency departments (ED) within two large healthcare systems based in North Carolina and Georgia.

Population studied: Researchers, stakeholders, practice facilitators, administrators, healthcare providers, clinic staff, patients, and caregivers.

Intervention/Instrument: First, an early study applied CFIR retrospectively to identify barriers and facilitators to adoption of a shared decision-making intervention. Researchers interviewed practice facilitators to score practices on CFIR constructs. Second, a follow-up study used CFIR to prospectively evaluate readiness for change prior to implementation. Third, as a follow-up study progressed, data from periodic CFIR guided surveys and key informant interviews were used to tailor implementation.

Outcome Measure: CFIR Analyses Results: First: Retrospective analysis from the early study distinguished 7 high, 1 medium, and 2 low implementation adopters. Weaknesses, such as little interest in setting performance goals, were consistent among the 2 low adopter practices. Second: Pre-implementation results in the follow-up study revealed comparable high levels of compatibility across ED settings; however, there was less agreement on leadership supporting change efforts. Third: Key facilitators and barriers emerged throughout CFIR survey periods. For example, evaluations at full implementation revealed providers felt initial training waned over time. Mapping identified barriers to ERIC strategies led to the development of re-education resources.

Conclusion: CFIR is an effective framework to employ at multiple stages of implementation. While retrospective analysis was useful, the ability to gain insight and provide actionable process improvements during implementation was a key strength to improve outcomes.

  • © 2023 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 21 (Supplement 1)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 21 (Supplement 1)
Vol. 21, Issue Supplement 1
1 Jan 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Applying the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) in Acute Care and Primary Care Evaluations
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Applying the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) in Acute Care and Primary Care Evaluations
Katherine O’Hare, Hazel Tapp, Lindsay Shade, Kelly Reeves, Melinda Manning, Jeremy Thomas, Cheryl Courtlandt, Rebecca Beesley, Diane Derkowski, Charity Patterson
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2023, 21 (Supplement 1) 3780; DOI: 10.1370/afm.21.s1.3780

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Applying the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) in Acute Care and Primary Care Evaluations
Katherine O’Hare, Hazel Tapp, Lindsay Shade, Kelly Reeves, Melinda Manning, Jeremy Thomas, Cheryl Courtlandt, Rebecca Beesley, Diane Derkowski, Charity Patterson
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2023, 21 (Supplement 1) 3780; DOI: 10.1370/afm.21.s1.3780
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Implementation Evaluation of a Community Health Worker Program for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes or Hypertension
  • Implementing quality improvement into practice: Exploring the work to develop and implement a QI project in primary care
  • An umbrella review of mHealth tool implementation strategies: a 6-step guide to optimize patient, caregiver and clinician use
Show more Dissemination and implementation research

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine