Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Meeting ReportWomen’s health

Family Medicine Presence on Labor and Delivery: Impact on Quality and Safety

Emily White VanGompel, Stephanie Radke, Lavisha Singh and Francesca Carlock
The Annals of Family Medicine January 2023, 21 (Supplement 1) 3976; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.21.s1.3976
Emily White VanGompel
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephanie Radke
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lavisha Singh
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Francesca Carlock
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Context: The consequences of continued loss of family physicians(FMs) practicing obstetrics in the United States has been characterized in terms of loss of access to care, particularly for rural patients; however, the impact on quality of care needs further study. Reducing the low-risk, primary cesarean rate is a national quality goal. Iowa is a state with a strong FM obstetrics presence where many rural hospitals are staffed exclusively by FMs with general surgery on call for cesarean deliveries.

Objective: To characterize the FM impact on cesarean delivery in Iowa birthing hospitals.

Study Design: Survey linked with administrative hospital data.

Dataset: Hospital characteristics were obtained from the Iowa Department of Public Health or self-reported.

Population Studied: Iowa clinicians delivering intrapartum care at hospitals participating in an initiative to reduce cesarean.

Instrument: The Labor Culture Survey is a valid measure of individual attitudes, beliefs, and unit culture on intrapartum units.

Outcome Measures: Primary outcome was the association between FM, obstetrician, or both disciplines’ presence on labor and delivery and hospital low-risk, primary cesarean delivery rate. Unit culture was compared by hospital type (FM-only, OB-only, or both).

Results: 849 clinicians from 39 hospitals completed the survey; 12 FM-only, 12 OB-only, and 15 hospitals with both. FM-only hospitals were all rural with less than 1,000 annual births. FMs practicing at FM-only hospitals had been practicing maternity care for longer than FMs at hospitals with both (13 vs 4 years, p=.02). Among hospitals with less than 1,000 annual births, compared to hospitals with both, births at FM-only hospitals had an adjusted 39% lower risk of cesarean (95% CI -0.16 to -0.62%; p<.01) and births at OB-only hospitals had an adjusted 16% lower risk of cesarean (95% CI -0.01 to -0.32%; p=.04). Nurses endorsed unit norms more supportive of vaginal birth at FM-only hospitals compared with both (mean Likert score 3.04 vs 2.91; p=.03), and stronger safety culture compared to OB-only or both (2.92 vs 2.79 and 2.76, respectively; p=.01).

Conclusions: Birthing hospitals staffed exclusively by FMs were more likely to have lower cesarean rates and stronger nursing-rated safety culture. Both access and quality of care provide strong arguments for reinforcing the pipeline of FMs training in intrapartum care.

  • © 2023 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 21 (Supplement 1)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 21 (Supplement 1)
Vol. 21, Issue Supplement 1
1 Jan 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Family Medicine Presence on Labor and Delivery: Impact on Quality and Safety
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
17 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Family Medicine Presence on Labor and Delivery: Impact on Quality and Safety
Emily White VanGompel, Stephanie Radke, Lavisha Singh, Francesca Carlock
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2023, 21 (Supplement 1) 3976; DOI: 10.1370/afm.21.s1.3976

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Family Medicine Presence on Labor and Delivery: Impact on Quality and Safety
Emily White VanGompel, Stephanie Radke, Lavisha Singh, Francesca Carlock
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2023, 21 (Supplement 1) 3976; DOI: 10.1370/afm.21.s1.3976
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Pregnancy outcomes and complications in refugees and other newcomers at a Family Medicine practice in Philadelphia, PA
  • Primary care clinics’ changes in abortion care after participation in the 2022-23 ExPAND Mifepristone Learning Collaborative
  • What Does Culturally Competent and Safe Perinatal Care Look Like? Lessons from an Ethnographic Study at the Maison Bleue
Show more Women’s health

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine