Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Meeting ReportScreening, prevention, and health promotion

Linking cancer screening interventions with the data: Intervention recommendations

Lynn Roberts, Peter Gozdyra, Liisa Jaakkimainen, Richard Glazier, Eliot Frymire, Tara Kiran, Kamila Premji, Michael Green and Fangyun Wu
The Annals of Family Medicine November 2023, 21 (Supplement 3) 5107; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.22.s1.5107
Lynn Roberts
BA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Gozdyra
MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Liisa Jaakkimainen
MD, MSc, CCFP, FCFP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard Glazier
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eliot Frymire
MA, BEd
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tara Kiran
MD, MSc, CCFP, FCFP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kamila Premji
MD, CCFP, FCFP, PhD(c)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Green
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fangyun Wu
MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Context: There are known inequities in breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening which may have been exacerbated over the COVID-19 pandemic.

Objective: Using cancer screening data from 2012 to 2021, identify if and how screening inequities changed over the pandemic.

Design and Analysis: We determined up-to-date status by cancer screening type at six-month intervals (April 1, 2012 to April 1, 2022) for overall study cohorts and stratified by income quintile and immigrant status. We determined up-to-date breast, cervical and colorectal screening status at two time points for overall study cohorts and stratified by study variables noted above. For each screening type, we conducted multivariable regression analyses using generalized linear models, with rate difference between the post- and prepandemic time points as outcome. Other key variables included: cancer screening type/modality, primary care model, region of origin (newcomers to Ontario only), geography including rurality.

Dataset: Health administrative data sets in Ontario, Canada.

Population Studied: Ontarians eligible for cancer screening (breast, cervical, colorectal: colonoscopy, FOBT).

Outcome Measures: Rates of cancer screening across breast, cervical, colorectal, colonoscopy, and FOBT.

Results: During COVID, substantial declines in up-to-date status for screening occurred, except for colonoscopies, which may be due to the 10-year testing schedule. Some recovery was seen in data as of February 2022. Not all patients were equally affected, with large differences seen between high and low income groups (12-15%), large regional variations in screening rates, and decreases in screening rates observed by primary care enrollment model. Largest decreases seen in models where physicians are exclusively or predominantly paid by fee-for-service. Smallest decreases seen in alternate payment models (e.g. capitation) and interprofessional team-based models. Immigrant status was associated with larger post-pandemic drops for breast and colorectal cancer screening.

Conclusions: Pre-existing inequities for people living in low-income neighbourhoods and for immigrants grew during the pandemic. Establishing attachment to a primary care provider who is supported to prioritize screening for rostered patients is a priority. Other recommended interventions include: targeted attachment to team based care for people experiencing inequities, pop up screening clinics, and engagement with community outreach groups.

  • © 2023 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 21 (Supplement 3)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 21 (Supplement 3)
Vol. 21, Issue Supplement 3
1 Nov 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Linking cancer screening interventions with the data: Intervention recommendations
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 7 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Linking cancer screening interventions with the data: Intervention recommendations
Lynn Roberts, Peter Gozdyra, Liisa Jaakkimainen, Richard Glazier, Eliot Frymire, Tara Kiran, Kamila Premji, Michael Green, Fangyun Wu
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2023, 21 (Supplement 3) 5107; DOI: 10.1370/afm.22.s1.5107

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Linking cancer screening interventions with the data: Intervention recommendations
Lynn Roberts, Peter Gozdyra, Liisa Jaakkimainen, Richard Glazier, Eliot Frymire, Tara Kiran, Kamila Premji, Michael Green, Fangyun Wu
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2023, 21 (Supplement 3) 5107; DOI: 10.1370/afm.22.s1.5107
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Cervical Cancer Screening Differences Between Black and White Women: An Examination of HPV and Pap Test Utilization.
  • Understanding the Relationship Between Social Needs and Cervical Cancer Screening
  • Accelerated biological aging leads to the trajectory of cardiometabolic multimorbidity to dementia and mortality
Show more Screening, prevention, and health promotion

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine