Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
NewsDepartmentsF

ABFM TO SIMPLIFY MOC FOR FAMILY PHYSICIANS AND MAKE IT MORE MEANINGFUL: A FAMILY MEDICINE REGISTRY

Robert L. Phillips
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2015, 13 (3) 288-290; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1793
Robert L. Phillips Jr.
American Board of Family Medicine
MD, MSPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

The American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM) launches the start of a Family Medicine Registry with a study called the Trial of Aggregate Data Exchange for Maintenance of certification and Raising Quality (TRADEMaRQ) study. This study is supported by the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and is the first phase of a nearly $7 million investment by the ABFM to make MOC easier and more meaningful, to help physicians turn their EHR data into useful information, and to support PQRS, Meaningful Use, and other reporting needs. The ABFM is the first board to sponsor a registry and the first clinical registry to support MOC.

TRADEMaRQ: Registry Phase I

TRADEMaRQ is the first stage of the registry and will test a way to automatically collect data for the quality improvement portion of MOC—not just for a handful of patients, but for all patients in your panel. This relieves doctors of the time-consuming task of collecting and submitting the information by hand. TRADEMaRQ will also give physicians feedback about their performance as they as they do MOC activities to help them see where they can make the greatest improvements, for example by increasing rates of recommended vaccinations or cancer screenings, or ensuring consistent medication use by patients with chronic conditions. The TRADEMaRQ research team will study whether performance feedback affects the Self-Assessment Modules and Practice Performance Modules physicians choose, and if it improves quality. TRADEMaRQ is a win-win-win proposition for family physicians who already receive quality measures from their system or EHR by streamlining submission for MOC—no more hand-entering data. The ABFM and researchers will learn what might help providers quickly and effectively improve their practice; and patients will benefit from physicians who have both up-to-date medical knowledge and more time for taking care of patients.

TRADEMaRQ has 3 aims:

  • To assess whether quality measures of family physicians’ entire patient panels can be shared easily with a certifying board

  • To study whether family physicians’ ability to view quality measures and comparisons with their peers will affect the types of self-assessment modules and quality improvement (QI) efforts they choose

  • To study whether viewing quality measures and comparisons with peers will influence the degree to which QI efforts improve future performance

The ABFM is launching TRADEMaRQ because many of its 85,000 certified family physicians already use quality measures to assess and guide QI and patient-panel management in their practices. It made little sense for them to have these whole-panel measures and then be required to enter quality measures for 10 of their patients by hand for MOC. Four health systems are participating in TRADEMaRQ: Kaiser Permanente Colorado; OCHIN; South East Texas Medical Associates; and Group Health Cooperative.

These study partners see the benefit for their family physicians for MOC and also hope that it will offer them broader choice of quality improvement options.

DAIQUERI: Registry Phase II

The second stage of the family medicine registry is the Data Abstraction and Intelligence Quality Engine for Research and Improvement (DAIQUERI). DAIQUERI will help physicians who cannot turn their EHR data into useful information or report their measures where they need to. DAIQUERI will extract EHR data to produce patient-level quality measures and disease registries so that family physicians can improve their practice. DAIQUERI will also enable family physicians to send their measures for MOC and other reporting requirements. DAIQUERI is being developed by FIGMD whose tools are currently being used by other physicians to meet PQRS reporting needs for thousands of physicians. DAIQUERI will be piloted in the summer of 2015, focusing on small practices as a priority. The ABFM committed to financially supporting the first 6,000 family physicians to enroll. Beyond that we aim to keep costs far lower than EHR vendors charge for data analytics and exchange tools, and lower than the average mobile phone bill. Some other professional society-sponsored registries charge much more, or they negotiate for pharma sponsorship in exchange for data. The ABFM will not engage in any data-sharing relationships that put family physician data at risk, and will give diplomates control over who has access to their data, and where it is sent.

Which QI Tools Matter?

Another benefit of the registry is that it will allow the ABFM to assess the benefits of various QI efforts. Currently, about one-half of family physicians do an approved MOC quality improvement project designed by someone other than the ABFM. We currently have no way of knowing whether those projects improve quality. The registry will eventually allow you to more reliably choose QI tools that make a difference.

More Meaningful Primary Care Measures

TRADEMaRQ and DAIQUERI are designed to reduce MOC burden, minimize the burden of quality measure reporting for payment, and improve ABFM’s capacity to support QI, but we expect that they will also help us provide leadership in developing more meaningful primary care measures. This leadership will be important as payers shift to value-based payments. In building out the registry, we recognize that there are hundreds of primary care measures, but no strategy for understanding which are most valuable. Diplomates tell us that they are struggling to keep up and there is considerable measurement fatigue. We also recognize that some of the most important primary care functions have no measures. The ABFM will be working closely with Family Medicine for America’s Health to understand which measures are most important and advocating for new high-value measures. The family medicine registry will strengthen the specialty’s position in negotiations with measure developers and payers.

An Investment in Family Medicine

The ABFM sees the registry as an important investment in family medicine. We recognize that PQRS, MU and other reporting requirements threaten reductions in your reimbursement or public embarrassment for non-reporting. The family medicine registry will reduce these risks. The ABFM has also partnered with the AAFP in submitting a Supporting and Aligning Network grant to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovations (CMMI) to use the registry to support Practice Transformation Networks. The ABFM is offering to triple the requested CMMI funding in order to align the registry and new MOC tools with practice transformation. We know that family medicine practices lack fundamental data support for a shift to value-based payments, and see this contract as a way to move the registry and MOC into a supporting role. It will also allow us to work closely with the AAFP in developing these supports. We hope to hear from CMMI soon about their decision.

New Tools for Community and Population Health

The Robert Graham Center has been very successful in developing geographic data tools to help community health centers all over the United States turn their patient data into maps that demonstrate who and where they serve, where access to healthcare remains poor, and how social determinants of health affect their communities. ABFM leaders helped develop those tools and now want to offer them to all family physicians. The ABFM is proposing to work with the Graham Center and HealthLandscape, its sister center in the AAFP, to develop the Population Health Assessment Tool (PHAsT). Family physicians enrolled in the registry would have the option of using PHAsT to define their clinical service area, understand which neighborhoods are most dependent on them, look at disease and quality clusters (‘hotspots’), and to draw on social determinant data to develop community vital signs for patients, and to look at risk of poor health across their community. Value-based payments mean greater accountability for population health, and most family physicians lack tools or the ability to use their data to inform this role. Many family physicians are also frustrated by patients who cannot or won’t take their medication or change health behaviors, often because they don’t understand what is going on in their patients’ lives, or because they don’t know who to partner with in the community to help their patients. PHAsT aims to help family physicians do population health better, and to improve understanding of community supports. For example, PHAsT may help you recognize that most of your patients with diabetes and hemoglobin A1c above 9.0 live in neighborhoods that are unsafe for exercise and lack healthy food sources. You could partner with a local YMCA, mall or armory to develop an indoor walking club, diabetes peer-support group, or farmers market—or all 3. We know from experience that family physicians in community health centers have used these tools in clever ways, and now want all family physicians to have the same opportunity, especially when payments may soon be based on population health outcomes.

In Invitation

TRADEMaRQ, DAIQUERI and PHAsT are a collective commitment that the ABFM is making to make MOC less burdensome, more meaningful, and a source of information that supports understanding and improvement in family medicine. This registry and its tools aim to help you do the right thing, at the right time, and earn more for it. The ABFM is actively seeking partners to help turn clinical data into tools that enhance primary care’s impact on health. We welcome questions, concerns, advice, or offers to collaborate.

  • © 2015 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 13 (3)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 13 (3)
Vol. 13, Issue 3
May/June 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
ABFM TO SIMPLIFY MOC FOR FAMILY PHYSICIANS AND MAKE IT MORE MEANINGFUL: A FAMILY MEDICINE REGISTRY
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
ABFM TO SIMPLIFY MOC FOR FAMILY PHYSICIANS AND MAKE IT MORE MEANINGFUL: A FAMILY MEDICINE REGISTRY
Robert L. Phillips
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2015, 13 (3) 288-290; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1793

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
ABFM TO SIMPLIFY MOC FOR FAMILY PHYSICIANS AND MAKE IT MORE MEANINGFUL: A FAMILY MEDICINE REGISTRY
Robert L. Phillips
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2015, 13 (3) 288-290; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1793
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • TRADEMaRQ: Registry Phase I
    • DAIQUERI: Registry Phase II
    • Which QI Tools Matter?
    • More Meaningful Primary Care Measures
    • An Investment in Family Medicine
    • New Tools for Community and Population Health
    • In Invitation
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Departments

  • Support for the WHO Resolution on Social Participation
  • Resident Leadership Roles and Selection
  • What do Primary Care Patients Want?
Show more Departments

Family Medicine Updates

  • Support for the WHO Resolution on Social Participation
  • Resident Leadership Roles and Selection
  • New Advocacy Ambassadors Program Helps AAFP Members Engage With Their Legislators
Show more Family Medicine Updates

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine