Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Meeting ReportResearch methodology and instrument development

Card studies using EHR alerts linked to REDCap questionnaires: a practical session on how to build the tools

Timothy Burdick, Charles MacLean, Constance van Eeghen, Donald Nease, Bruce Jobse, Zoe Daudier, Maureen Boardman, John Westfall and Meagan Stabler
The Annals of Family Medicine November 2024, 22 (Supplement 1) 6345; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.22.s1.6345
Timothy Burdick
MD, MBA, MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charles MacLean
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Constance van Eeghen
DrPH, MHSA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Donald Nease
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bruce Jobse
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zoe Daudier
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maureen Boardman
APRN, ARNP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Westfall
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Meagan Stabler
PhD, CHES
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Researchers use card studies to obtain observational data about primary care provider (PCP) knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors on a variety of topics. Card studies have been influential in changing clinical practice, such as the reduction of antibiotics in patients with upper respiratory infections. Cards are usually printed on heavy-stock paper, include 2-5 questions, and take >3 minutes to complete at a patient visit. Paper cards are easy to design and deploy but have associated costs (printing, postage, data entry, etc). In 2022, Bunce et al embedded “card” questions into an electronic health record (EHR) with responses saved to the EHR database. This talk describes revisions to their methods for designing and building EHR-based cards that can be replicated in academic healthcare settings and some community clinics.

Methods We engaged PCPs, EHR analysts, a REDCap analyst, and the research team in a series of design meetings. The group identified these goals: 1) the EHR alerts would trigger only for PCPs and patients who met the research project inclusion criteria; 2) alerts would minimize disruptions to the clinical workflows; 3) PCP could choose not to complete a card; 4) card responses would not be to the patient medical record; 5) cards would allow for complex questions with branching logic and skip patterns.

Results We used a standard Epic Best Practice Advisory (BPA) configured to pop-up only for select PCPs during specific weeks. In the pop-up, PCPs could defer completing the card until later. The pop-up included a hyperlink to a REDCap questionnaire that easily handled branching logic and skip questions. Card responses were easily managed in the REDCap database, not in the medical record. A survey of PCP users showed equal satisfaction with paper or EHR-based cards. For large projects, overall costs of the EHR-based cards is favorable to paper cards due to ease of data management. In this presentation, we will show participants details of how we configured the Epic and REDCap tools, making it relatively easy to replicate the process for other card studies.

Conclusions EHR-based cards are feasible at most academic healthcare systems but may be harder to use at smaller, community-based clinics with less support of the EHR. EHR-based cards are convenient due to simplicity of data management and ability to build questionnaires with branching logic.

  • © 2024 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc. For the private, noncommercial use of one individual user of the Web site. All other rights reserved.
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 22 (Supplement 1)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 22 (Supplement 1)
Vol. 22, Issue Supplement 1
20 Nov 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Card studies using EHR alerts linked to REDCap questionnaires: a practical session on how to build the tools
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
18 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Card studies using EHR alerts linked to REDCap questionnaires: a practical session on how to build the tools
Timothy Burdick, Charles MacLean, Constance van Eeghen, Donald Nease, Bruce Jobse, Zoe Daudier, Maureen Boardman, John Westfall, Meagan Stabler
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2024, 22 (Supplement 1) 6345; DOI: 10.1370/afm.22.s1.6345

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Card studies using EHR alerts linked to REDCap questionnaires: a practical session on how to build the tools
Timothy Burdick, Charles MacLean, Constance van Eeghen, Donald Nease, Bruce Jobse, Zoe Daudier, Maureen Boardman, John Westfall, Meagan Stabler
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2024, 22 (Supplement 1) 6345; DOI: 10.1370/afm.22.s1.6345
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Differential Adoption of a New Approach to Weight Management in Primary Care
  • Utility of comics to support member-checking in realist evaluation
  • Reliability and Validity of a Comprehensiveness of Care Measure in Primary Care, A Case Study of the PRIME Registry
Show more Research methodology and instrument development

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine