Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
NewsDepartmentsF

PROGRAM DIRECTORS AND CERA: AN IMPORTANT RELATIONSHIP

Stephen Schultz, Paul Crawford, Natasha Bhuyan, Gretchen M. Dickson, James W. Jarvis, Lisa Maxwell, Michael Mazzone, W. Fred Miser, Karen Mitchell and Todd Shaffer
The Annals of Family Medicine July 2015, 13 (4) 388-389; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1831
Stephen Schultz
MD, FAAFP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Crawford
MD, FAAFP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Natasha Bhuyan
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gretchen M. Dickson
MD, MBA, FAAFP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James W. Jarvis
MD, FAAFP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lisa Maxwell
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Mazzone
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
W. Fred Miser
MD, MA, FAAFP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karen Mitchell
MD, FAAFP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Todd Shaffer
MD, MBA, FAAFP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

How many acronyms do you know where one of the acronym letters stands for an acronym? An acronym within an acronym? We hope most family medicine program directors think of CERA right away. CERA stands for CAFM Educational Research Alliance; CAFM is the Council of Academic Family Medicine.

Program directors are critical to the ongoing success of CERA for 2 reasons. CERA facilitates about 5 surveys every year. Only the program director population is surveyed twice every year and receives more proposals than all the other surveys combined, which tells us that we hold the answers to a lot of important questions from the rest of the “family” of family medicine organizations.

CERA surveys contain questions that are submitted by a variety of family medicine researchers and educators. For example, the last CERA program director survey contained submissions from medical schools, community programs, program directors, residency faculty, social scientists, and pharmacists.

CERA understands that program directors have limited time; therefore, they accept only proposals that include a good hypothesis, are related to what program directors do, contain decent questions, and finally, will likely end up in a published paper. Additionally, the results are archived to help others answer their research questions.

For these reasons, responding to CERA surveys should rank as a high priority for program directors. This seems to be the case, as the PD response rate, at 38% for the first CERA survey of program directors, has increased to over 60%. This is great; but clerkship directors’ response rate is more than 90%!

Another reason program directors are critical to the ongoing success of CERA is relevance. As program directors, we know the relevant questions to ask in order to advance family medicine education. We are in the midst of tremendous changes in both our clinical and educational infrastructures, and there is very little evidence to support any of the educational changes. We as program directors need to do our part to ensure our residents are still learning how to provide high-quality care to patients in the face of changing environments. CERA surveys can be excellent tools along these lines.

Most program directors think of themselves as clinician-educators, and CERA gives us the means to ask questions in a rigorous way. Once a proposal is accepted, CERA provides institutional review board approval through the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) as well as experienced mentors. This collegial support from the rest of our family medicine community through CERA is invaluable as program directors expand our scholarship into the realm of educational research. An added benefit of CERA involvement is that it also provides an excellent opportunity to help you and your faculty meet the review committee for family medicine’s faculty scholarly activity requirement.

The AFMRD benefits greatly from the active involvement of its members in various organizations and activities, including CERA. For the last 2 years, Dr Paul Crawford, program director at Nellis Family Medicine Residency in Las Vegas, Nevada, has served as the AFMRD liaison to CERA. Dr Wendy Barr, associate program director at the Greater Lawrence Family Health Center in Lawrence, Massachusetts, is the new liaison.

CERA covets proposals from program directors, yet a limited number of proposals are received from program directors because, for one reason, program directors find many questions in the CERA surveys lack relevance to their roles. This lack of relevance is also the reason the AFMRD is taking the initiative to assist program directors in developing CERA proposals.

Those of us who consider ourselves novices at educational research and survey design will appreciate that the AFMRD Board is partnering with several researchers familiar with the CERA process to offer program directors mentoring, feedback, and suggestions prior to submission to CERA. Interested AFMRD members will be connected with a mentor/reviewer by contacting Lynn Pickerel at afmrd{at}aafp.org.

CERA accepts program director proposals twice a year, but please do not wait until the deadline—plan now. Develop your research question and hypothesis and start on the path to getting relevant questions about residency education answered!

  • © 2015 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 13 (4)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 13 (4)
Vol. 13, Issue 4
July/August 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
PROGRAM DIRECTORS AND CERA: AN IMPORTANT RELATIONSHIP
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
PROGRAM DIRECTORS AND CERA: AN IMPORTANT RELATIONSHIP
Stephen Schultz, Paul Crawford, Natasha Bhuyan, Gretchen M. Dickson, James W. Jarvis, Lisa Maxwell, Michael Mazzone, W. Fred Miser, Karen Mitchell, Todd Shaffer
The Annals of Family Medicine Jul 2015, 13 (4) 388-389; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1831

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
PROGRAM DIRECTORS AND CERA: AN IMPORTANT RELATIONSHIP
Stephen Schultz, Paul Crawford, Natasha Bhuyan, Gretchen M. Dickson, James W. Jarvis, Lisa Maxwell, Michael Mazzone, W. Fred Miser, Karen Mitchell, Todd Shaffer
The Annals of Family Medicine Jul 2015, 13 (4) 388-389; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1831
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Departments

  • What do Primary Care Patients Want?
  • STFM Announces New Point of Care Ultrasound Task Force and Initiative on POCUS Family Medicine Education
  • Addressing Research Pathway Gaps: Insights from a Needs Assessment at the AAFP Future Conference
Show more Departments

Family Medicine Updates

  • New Advocacy Ambassadors Program Helps AAFP Members Engage With Their Legislators
  • STFM Announces New Point of Care Ultrasound Task Force and Initiative on POCUS Family Medicine Education
  • Addressing Research Pathway Gaps: Insights from a Needs Assessment at the AAFP Future Conference
Show more Family Medicine Updates

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine