Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleSecondary data analysis

Family Practice: A more balanced, not just negative narrative based on data and evidence

Steve Slade and Lorelei Nardi
The Annals of Family Medicine November 2024, 22 (Supplement 1) 6718; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.22.s1.6718
Steve Slade
BA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lorelei Nardi
MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Context: Concerns about family practice are well-founded, but also negatively biased. This can fuel poor impressions among medical students and dispirit practicing family physicians.

Objective: Give a balanced description of family medicine and family practice, including positive evidence that is lacking in the public narrative.

Study Design and Analysis: Descriptive analysis. Pan-Canadian results based on most recent data.

Datasets: Datasets from the Association of Faculties of Medicine of Canada (AFMC), Canadian Resident Matching Service (CaRMS), Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI), Canadian Medical Association (CMA), and College of Family Physicians of Canada (CFPC).

Population Studied and Instruments: Medical students, family medicine (FM) residents, and practicing physicians in all provinces and territories. The AFMC surveys all graduating medical students in Canada (1,838 responses and response rate of 60% in 2022). CaRMS covers all residency programs in Canada (2,937 applicants in 2023). The CMA’s National Physician Health Survey (NPHS) is an open-link survey with 3,489 responses from practicing physicians in 2021. CIHI’s National Physician Database (NPDB) contains fee-for-service billing data for all physicians in Canada (269 million services in 2021). The CFPC Family Medicine Longitudinal Survey (FMLS) includes all second-year family medicine residents (53% response rate in 2022).

Outcome Measures: Medical student and FM residents' perceptions and career choices; practicing physicians' health, satisfaction, and scope of practice.

Results: 42% of graduating medical students rate their FM experiences as being “excellent”, compared to an average of 30% for other disciplines. Medical students who choose FM are highly successful in the CaRMS match; for 80% FM is their top-ranked discipline and 98% match in the first iteration. The NPHS shows that 81% of GPs have high emotional well-being, compared to 78% of medical specialists and 75% of surgical specialists. The NPDB shows that family physicians practice in broad areas; they account for 52% of all medical services, including 47% of psychotherapy counselling, 49% of hospital-based assessments, and 21% of anesthesia services. The FMLS shows that 90% of FM residents are proud to become family physicians and 98% feel they make valuable contributions.

Conclusions: A more positive, balanced, and evidence-based story can and should be told about FM and family practice.

  • © 2024 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc. For the private, noncommercial use of one individual user of the Web site. All other rights reserved.
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 22 (Supplement 1)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 22 (Supplement 1)
Vol. 22, Issue Supplement 1
20 Nov 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Family Practice: A more balanced, not just negative narrative based on data and evidence
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
8 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Family Practice: A more balanced, not just negative narrative based on data and evidence
Steve Slade, Lorelei Nardi
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2024, 22 (Supplement 1) 6718; DOI: 10.1370/afm.22.s1.6718

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Family Practice: A more balanced, not just negative narrative based on data and evidence
Steve Slade, Lorelei Nardi
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2024, 22 (Supplement 1) 6718; DOI: 10.1370/afm.22.s1.6718
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • A Comparative Study Using Patient-Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) in Prenatal Screening Among Pregnant Women in Canada
  • Explaining differences in diagnostic test accuracy between primary and secondary care: an IPD meta-analysis
Show more Secondary data analysis

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine