Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • The Issue in Brief
    • Past Issues in Brief
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
    • Associate Editor Opening
    • Current Opportunities
    • Job Board
  • COVID-19
    • Preprint Collection
    • Casenotes Blog

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • The Issue in Brief
    • Past Issues in Brief
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
    • Associate Editor Opening
    • Current Opportunities
    • Job Board
  • COVID-19
    • Preprint Collection
    • Casenotes Blog
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
NewsFamily Medicine UpdatesF

A SHARED AIM FOR STUDENT CHOICE OF FAMILY MEDICINE: AN UPDATE FROM ADFM AND FAMILY MEDICINE FOR AMERICA’S HEALTH

C. Kelly; FMA Health Workforce Education & Development Team, M.A. Roett, K. McCrory, A. Coutinho, N. Bhuyan, M. Alavi, T. Ho, C. Stisher; FMAHealth Workforce Project teams, A. Bentley; AAFP, M.A. Roett, P. M. Diller, A. Davis; ADFM Education Transformation Committee and M. A. Roett; Georgetown University Medical Center Dept of Family Medicine
The Annals of Family Medicine January 2018, 16 (1) 90-91; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2191
C. Kelly
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M.A. Roett
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. McCrory
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Coutinho
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
N. Bhuyan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Alavi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T. Ho
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Stisher
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Bentley
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M.A. Roett
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. M. Diller
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Davis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. A. Roett
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

Recently, through the Family Medicine for America’s Health (FMAHealth) Workforce team, 8 family medicine organizations endorsed a “shared aim” to: increase the percentage of US senior allopathic and osteopathic medical students choosing family medicine from 12% to 25% by 2030. Twenty-five percent is a stretch goal aligning current efforts and resources with the ultimate primary care workforce goal of 40%.

The Four Pillars for Primary Care Physician Workforce Reform provides a blueprint with leverage points.1 ADFM expanded on this to illustrate points where Departments of Family Medicine (DFMs) could engage along the “four pillars” continuum,2 and the ADFM Education Transformation Committee provided a worksheet further addressing where DFMs could engage locally.3

In the last 3 years, the FMAHealth Workforce Team has explored strategies along the “four pillars” continuum. The FMAHealth Workforce Team’s analysis of engagement is summarized below:

Pipeline

Workforce Diversity

Improving health professional diversity is central to pipeline efforts to produce the diverse primary care workforce needed. Collaborative efforts outside family medicine, such as the “Beyond Flexner Alliance,” and working with leadership from organizations with missions including improving the health of underserved communities, are essential.

Student Factor Analysis

Medical students’ specialty choice is a multifactorial process. Virtual focus groups conducted with both M4 students who choose and do not choose family medicine at schools with high and low family physician production identified several key themes, including a need for high quality preceptors, the value of rural family medicine experiences, understanding the full scope of family medicine, and the importance of “top down” institutional influences.

Impact of Organizational Programming

Through work with the AAFP, preliminary data analysis on family medicine Interest Groups (FMIGs) identified significant positive correlates to match rates. Data showed that FMIG support is an important strategy for maintaining and increasing student choice, but should not be the only strategy, as students are motivated by different experiences and values. Attending the AAFP National Conference and AAFP student membership may also play an important role.

Process of Medical Education

Identity of “What Matters:”

To identify changes in medical education with the greatest potential influence on student choice, the ADFM surveyed Department Chairs, medical school models of positive deviance were investigated, and focus groups of key stakeholders were conducted. A partnership between FMA-Health, AAFP, STFM, and ADFM created a Family Medicine Student Choice Learning and Action Network (SCLAN) to learn, test and measure the impact of interventions. ADFM’s work on the Best Practice Guidebook Project will provide a SLAN pilot tool.

Training Future Advocates

As family physicians, one of our most important roles is as advocates for our patients. A CERA Program Director survey and national student/resident survey will identify needs and contribute to a model curricular resource for advocacy training.

Leadership Development

Through the Primary Care Leadership Collaborative (PCLC), a collaboration between FMAHealth, AAFP, and Primary Care Progress, a new FMIG leadership model is being tested teaching relational leadership skills. PCLC trains medical students to take meaningful action that advances their local primary care communities.

Shortage of High Quality Primary Care Community Preceptors

Identified by FMAHealth as an important issue, STFM convened a multi-stakeholder preceptor summit which included students, residents, health system leaders, policy experts, clerkship directors, community preceptors, and non-precepting physicians. The subsequent action plan identifies partnerships and initiatives to drive health system change.

Practice Transformation

Burnout prevention and wellness are major focus areas for physicians and trainees. Student and resident leaders implemented awareness-building strategies and assessed what has the biggest potential for change.

Payment Reform

Faculty Salary Gap

In addition to the broad impact which payment reform has on primary care physician workforce development,2 the payment gap between faculty and employed/private practice physicians should be a part of payment reform work.

These programs highlight the collective impact of family medicine organizations on increasing student choice. Looking deeper into the evidence, collaborative opportunities within and outside family medicine, and innovative work around the four pillars will allow each of us to contribute to the shared aim.

Footnotes

  • For this issue, the ADFM is pleased to use this space for a paper by Family Medicine for America’s Health, a collaboration of ADFM and 7 other national family medicine organizations. We also acknowledge specifically the contributions of ADFM’s Education Transformation Committee.

  • © 2018 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.

References

    1. Hepworth J,
    2. Davis A,
    3. Harris A,
    4. et al
    . The four pillars for primary care physician workforce reform: a blueprint for future activity. Ann Fam Med. 2014;12(1)83–87. http://www.annfammed.org/content/12/1/83.full.pdf+html.
    1. Matson C,
    2. Davis A,
    3. Epling J,
    4. et al
    . Influencing student specialty choice: the 4 pillars for primary care physician workforce development. Ann Fam Med. 2015;13(5):494–495. http://www.annfammed.org/content/13/5/494.full.pdf+html.
    1. Diller PM,
    2. Weidner A,
    3. Roett MA,
    4. Wilke A,
    5. Davis A
    . Putting the four pillars for primary care physician workforce into practice locally. Ann Fam Med. 2017;15(2):189–190. http://www.annfammed.org/content/15/2/189.full.pdf+html.

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Past Issues in Brief
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Online First

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Media
  • Job Seekers

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2021 Annals of Family Medicine