Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
NewsFamily Medicine UpdatesF

AAFP CREDIT SYSTEM RECONSIDERS FUNCTIONAL MEDICINE TOPICS

Chris Crawford
The Annals of Family Medicine July 2018, 16 (4) 373-374; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2272
Chris Crawford
AAFP News Department
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

The AAFP Credit System will begin approving functional medicine topics in accordance with the credit system’s eligibility requirements (https://www.aafp.org/cme/creditsys/about/eligibility.html) and topic-specific guidance issued by the AAFP’s Commission on Continuing Professional Development (COCPD), effective immediately.

The COCPD’s topic-specific guidance on functional medicine now says: “Activities and sessions eligible for credit are limited to those that provide clinicians with an overview or scope of functional medicine and the techniques that functional medicine practitioners use, so family physicians can educate interested patients about the topic.”

“Activities and sessions for credit that are ineligible include those that teach clinicians how to perform techniques, modalities or applications of functional medicine in their clinical practices.”

Members may claim CME credit for functional medicine activities and sessions that are certified for credit by the AAFP Credit System.

Background

The Cleveland Clinic’s Center for Functional Medicine defines functional medicine as “a personalized, systems-oriented model that empowers patients and practitioners to achieve the highest expression of health by working in collaboration to address the underlying causes of disease.”

In 2013, the AAFP’s COCPD, which oversees the AAFP Credit System, recognized that CME provider organizations applying for credit for activities and sessions about functional medicine were receiving inconsistent credit determinations.

In response, the COCPD conducted a literature review on functional medicine, and based on this review, the group determined at the time there wasn’t sufficient evidence to award AAFP credit to activities and sessions on the topic. So, a moratorium was placed on functional medicine in February 2014. That moratorium expired in 2016, at which time another evidence review was conducted and the COCPD extended its moratorium based on similar reasoning. This most recent moratorium expired in February of this year.

In anticipation of this expiration, the AAFP Credit System issued a call for comment on functional medicine in September 2017 to AAFP members, CME provider organizations, functional medicine stakeholders and other national accreditors. The request for feedback included a call for evidence on functional medicine’s efficacy in the application of family medicine and any additional supporting evidence and/or literature.

The information received was objectively reviewed and summarized in a report by a third party and presented to the COCPD. That information, along with several literature reviews and results from the AAFP Member Survey, informed the commission’s decision to lift the moratorium on functional medicine. The change went into effect after it was recently approved by the AAFP Board of Directors.

Family Physician Expert’s Perspective

COCPD Chair Melody Jordahl-Iafrato, MD, of Tucson, Arizona, told AAFP News that although the moratorium has been lifted, activities or sessions covering functional medicine must comply with the AAFP Credit System’s eligibility requirements and with the topic-specific guidance issued by the COCPD.

Under the newly issued topic-specific guidance, for example, Jordahl-Iafrato said a session that provides an overview of what functional medicine encompasses would be eligible for credit.

“This may include some examples of techniques, but not teaching how to do these techniques,” she said. “However, a session that teaches how to treat a specific disease—such as neurological or gastrointestinal disease—with functional medicine principles would not be eligible.”

After the literature review in 2014, the COCPD did not find sufficient evidence to support the use of functional medicine in family medicine and, in some cases, determined the claims being made to be potentially dangerous, Jordahl-Iafrato explained.

The commission followed a similar evidence review process in 2016 with the same results, she added.

“The COCPD acknowledged that while sufficient evidence does not exist, patients still may be utilizing or asking about functional medicine; therefore, it’s important for members to be informed on the concept of functional medicine and what patients might be asking about regarding their health care and treatment options,” Jordahl-Iafrato said.

However, she noted, given the current lack of evidence, the COCPD does not deem it appropriate to learn how to practice functional medicine or implement related techniques within an AAFP-certified CME activity.

“The COCPD understands that many family physicians have an interest in functional medicine and we’ll continue to review this topic as more research is done,” Jordahl-Iafrato said. “The AAFP Credit System strives to certify CME that is evidence-based, objective and balanced, which means benefits have been proven and all possible risks, side effects and negative outcomes should be acknowledged.

“Ideally, CME includes fair, balanced consideration of all usual and customary approaches and not only the approach preferred by the CME provider.”

Questions about functional medicine may be submitted to the AAFP Credit System at cmecredit{at}aafp.org; inquiries on claiming CME credits should be directed to the AAFP’s Member Resource Center at 800-274-2237.

  • © 2018 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 16 (4)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 16 (4)
Vol. 16, Issue 4
July/August 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
AAFP CREDIT SYSTEM RECONSIDERS FUNCTIONAL MEDICINE TOPICS
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
AAFP CREDIT SYSTEM RECONSIDERS FUNCTIONAL MEDICINE TOPICS
Chris Crawford
The Annals of Family Medicine Jul 2018, 16 (4) 373-374; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2272

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
AAFP CREDIT SYSTEM RECONSIDERS FUNCTIONAL MEDICINE TOPICS
Chris Crawford
The Annals of Family Medicine Jul 2018, 16 (4) 373-374; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2272
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Background
    • Family Physician Expert’s Perspective
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Support for the WHO Resolution on Social Participation
  • Resident Leadership Roles and Selection
  • New Advocacy Ambassadors Program Helps AAFP Members Engage With Their Legislators
Show more Family Medicine Updates

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine