Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Multimedia
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Call for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Multimedia
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Call for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
NewsFamily Medicine UpdatesF

Community Needs Assessment and Development Using the Participatory Research Model

The Annals of Family Medicine September 2003, 1 (3) 183-184;
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Participatory research is a collaborative model that promotes the development of critical partnerships and the application of research conclusions into the process of community development. It is a means by which the expertise of primary care researchers can produce new knowledge through developing research partnerships with the community. The knowledge, expertise, and resources of the involved community are frequently key to effective research and problem solving.

The participatory research model began as a movement for social justice in international development activities and has evolved into a tool for improving social and economic conditions, effecting change, and increasing trust for scientists and community development efforts among the members of the communities studied. Today, participatory research represents a methodology for partnering with communities to develop interventions that are acceptable to community members, for evaluating and demonstrating the effectiveness of the intervention with community members, and for sustaining the intervention beyond external funding.

There are three critical attributes of the participatory research model: collaboration throughout the research process, a mutually rewarding educational experience for researchers and community members, and tangible action based on research results. Collaborations promote sharing of decision making throughout the research process, from refining the question and undertaking the research to interpreting the data and jointly disseminating the results. A critical process goal is for the community to build its own capacity by developing skills, applying research results to improve the quality of life, and planning for future health needs. In addition, the participatory research model more effectively answers the questions that emerge from within communities, thereby increasing community capacity building and sustainability.

There is a growing recognition among researchers of the distinction and the importance of participatory research compared with the more historical model for community needs evaluation and development, often referred to as top-down research or derogatorily as “helicopter” or “safari” research. The participatory research model has gained prominence during the last decade through the community research accomplished in collaboration with indigenous peoples of North America and by an endorsement of NAPCRG in a 1998 policy statement, reproduced on the organization’s Web page, www.napcrg.org/exec.html.1,2

The rationale and methodologies applied by researchers using the participatory research model bear a striking similarity to those of primary care researchers using practice-based research networks. In both cases, a genuine partnership must develop between researchers and the community to overcome historical animosities, define relevant questions, acquire data to answer questions, and ensure that research results are translated into reality, whether applicable to patient care or community development.

As with all primary care research, community-based research that uses the participatory concept requires a greater understanding among potential sponsors of the three critical attributes that define the model. Because of the need for negotiation and two-way education, participatory research calls for a longer start-up or developmental phase. Further, the purpose of this phase precludes researchers from clearly defining an a priori methodology. Research partnerships, like any partnership, require time to build trust and mutually rewarding relationships. Partnership building and the time required to negotiate process and outcomes, though lengthy, are clearly beneficial to the research process, producing research conclusions that are more relevant and more likely to be implemented.

Given the probability that researcher-community partnerships might not be able to adhere to the typical prerequisites of sponsors’ requests for funding applications, several institutes and centers within the National Institutes for Health and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research offer 6- to 12-month developmental grants to support the requirements of initial partnership building. Such vehicles offer an excellent opportunity to support the negotiation and development phase of participatory research.

As with any new methodology for expanding our body of knowledge, participatory research potentially raises new, ethical challenges, such as the extent to which the protection of the community might need to be considered in addition to the protection of the individual.3 Nevertheless, participatory research represents one more valuable methodology in the expanding toolbox of primary care research methodologies.

Ann C. Macaulay, MD, FCFP

McGill University

John G. Ryan, DrPH

University of Miami

  • © 2003 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    Macaulay AC, Gibson N, Freeman W, et al. Responsible research with communities: participatory research in primary care: a policy statement for the North American Primary Care Research Group. Available at: www.napcrg.org. Accessed August 25, 2003.
  2. ↵
    Macaulay AC, Gibson N, Freeman W, et al, for the North American Primary Care Research Group. Participatory research maximizes community and lay involvement. BMJ 1999;319:774–778.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Weijer C, Goldsand G, Emanuel EJ. Protecting communities in research: current guidelines and limits of extrapolation. Nature Genetics 1999;23:275–280.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 1 (3)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 1 (3)
Vol. 1, Issue 3
1 Sep 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Community Needs Assessment and Development Using the Participatory Research Model
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
14 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Community Needs Assessment and Development Using the Participatory Research Model
The Annals of Family Medicine Sep 2003, 1 (3) 183-184;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Community Needs Assessment and Development Using the Participatory Research Model
The Annals of Family Medicine Sep 2003, 1 (3) 183-184;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • STFM’s Behavioral Science/Family Systems Educator Fellowship and the Emerging Leaders Fellowship
  • Winning the Peace: Measuring Faculty Time to Support Residency Redesign
  • The Grant Generating Project: Giving Primary Care Researchers Tools to Succeed
Show more Family Medicine Updates

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Past Issues in Brief
  • Multimedia
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Online First
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2023 Annals of Family Medicine