Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Lung Cancer Screening Practices of Primary Care Physicians: Results From a National Survey

Carrie N. Klabunde, Pamela M. Marcus, Paul K. J. Han, Thomas B. Richards, Sally W. Vernon, Gigi Yuan and Gerard A. Silvestri
The Annals of Family Medicine March 2012, 10 (2) 102-110; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1340
Carrie N. Klabunde
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: KlabundC@mail.nih.gov
Pamela M. Marcus
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul K. J. Han
MD, MA, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas B. Richards
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sally W. Vernon
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gigi Yuan
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gerard A. Silvestri
MD, MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Percentage of primary care physicians who ordered lung cancer screening tests by types of patients for whom they would recommend lung cancer screening.

    LDCT = low-dose spiral computed tomography.

    Note: Brackets indicate 95% CIs.

    a Chest radiograph, sputum cytology, or LDCT.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Characteristics of Primary Care Physicians and Their Practice Settings (N = 962)

    CharacteristicUnweighted nWeighted %
    Physician characteristics
    Years since graduation from medical school
     <1013614.0
     10–1930932.7
     20–2928830.5
     ≥3022922.8
    Sex
     Male68070.4
     Female28229.6
    Race/ethnicity
     White, non-Hispanic69871.9
     Asian14915.3
     Othera11512.8
    Specialty
     Family medicine48150.7
     General practice664.4
     General internal medicine41545.0
    Board certified74579.5
    International medical graduate23624.4
    Practice characteristics
    Primary practice arrangement
     Full/part owner of practice52153.8
     Employee or other/missing44146.2
    Practice size (number of physicians)
     125626.4
     2–540041.7
     6–1519820.7
     ≥1610210.6
     Missing60.7
    Geographic location
     Urbanb76280.2
     Large rural city/townc10810.7
     Small/isolated small rural townd929.1
    Census region
     Northeast18419.9
     Midwest25323.9
     West20522.9
     South32033.3
    Type of health record system used
     Full EHR17718.7
     Partial EHR899.5
     Transitioning from paper to EHR14415.2
     Paper charts54555.9
     Missing70.8
    Patients uninsured, %
     0–556459.5
     6–2529129.6
     ≥26686.8
     Don’t know/missing394.0
    Physician practice style
    Has an affiliation with a medical school31633.8
    Patient volume during a typical week
     ≤7531632.7
     76–10030331.7
     101–12520221.3
     ≥12612612.8
     Missing151.5
    Colorectal cancer screening intensity
     Low/moderate60562.8
     High32233.9
     Unknown353.4
    Types of patients for whom the physician would recommend lung cancer screening
     All, regardless of smoking exposure16717.2
     Any smoking exposure, passive or active29330.4
     Current and/or former smokers only18419.0
     None30832.3
     Missing101.0
    • EHR=electronic health record.

    • ↵a Includes Hispanic; black, non-Hispanic; American Indian/Alaska Native; Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander; multiple races; other race; and unknown.

    • ↵b Rural-Urban Commuting Area 2 (RUCA2) codes 1.0, 1.1, 2.0, 2.1, 3.0, 4.1, 7.1.

    • ↵c RUCA2 codes 4.0, 4.2, 5.0, 5.2, 6.0.

    • ↵d RUCA2 codes 7.0, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 8.0, 8.2, 8.3, 9.0, 9.1, 10.0, 10.2, 10.4, 10.5, 10.6.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Primary Care Physicians’ Lung Cancer Screening Beliefs, Self-Reported Practices, and Patient Influence (N=962)

    MeasureUnweighted nWeighted % (95% CI)
    Physician beliefs
    Believes any expert group recommends lung cancer screening23925.1 (22.2–28.2)
    Believes chest radiograph is effective in reducing lung cancer mortality for
     Never smokers26927.7 (25.1–30.5)
     Former smokers51052.4 (49.0–55.8)
     Current smokers46848.0 (44.7–51.3)
    Believes sputum cytology is effective in reducing lung cancer mortality for
     Never smokers17517.8 (15.7–20.2)
     Former smokers27328.3 (25.7–31.0)
     Current smokers31933.3 (30.5–36.3)
    Believes LDCT is effective in reducing lung cancer mortality for
     Never smokers32534.0 (31.1–37.0)
     Former smokers57460.4 (57.2–63.5)
     Current smokers63466.8 (63.5–69.9)
    Physician practices
    Lung cancer screening tests ordered in past 12 monthsa
     Chest radiograph53055.3 (52.0–58.4)
     Sputum cytology414.5 (3.3–6.2)
     LDCT21122.3 (19.9–24.9)
    Patterns of lung cancer screening tests ordered in past 12 months
     Chest radiograph only32934.0 (30.9–37.2)
     LDCT only343.6 (2.5–5.3)
     Chest radiograph and LDCT, with or without sputum cytology16717.8 (15.4–20.5)
     Sputum cytology, with or without chest radiograph or LDCT212.0 (1.3–3.0)
     None36037.6 (34.9–40.4)
     Unknown515.0 (3.7–6.7)
    Patient influence
    Number of patients who have asked about lung cancer screening in past 12 months
     029330.3 (27.7–33.0)
     1–525326.2 (23.2–29.4)
     6–1017418.4 (15.8–21.4)
     11–2011912.5 (10.5–14.8)
     >2010811.1 (8.9–13.7)
     Unknown151.5 (0.9–2.5)
    • CI=confidence interval; LDCT = low-dose spiral computed tomography.

    • ↵a Physicians responded to survey items asking, “During the past 12 months, to screen an asymptomatic patient for lung cancer, did you ever order…” None indicates negative response for all 3 tests.

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Multivariate Models Assessing Factors Associated With Primary Care Physicians’ Ordering of Lung Cancer Screening Tests

    FactorOrdered Chest Radiograph OR (95% CI)Ordered LDCT OR (95% CI)
    Physician characteristics
    Years since graduation from medical school
     <101.01.0
     10–191.2 (0.7–2.3)1.7 (0.9–3.3)
     20–292.2 (1.2–4.1)a3.0 (1.5–5.9)a
     ≥301.5 (0.8–3.0)2.5 (1.3–5.0)
    Sex
     Male1.01.0
     Female1.2 (0.8–1.8)0.8 (0.5–1.4)
    Specialty
     Family medicine/general practice1.01.0
     General internal medicine1.2 (0.8–1.7)1.6 (1.1–2.4)a
    Board certified
     Yes1.01.0
     No0.8 (0.5–1.3)0.9 (0.6–1.5)
    Practice characteristics
    Primary practice arrangement
     Full/part owner of practice1.6 (1.0–2.3)1.4 (0.9–2.1)
     Employee or other/missing1.01.0
    Practice size (number of physicians)
     11.01.0
     2–50.1 (0.7–1.7)1.5 (0.9–2.5)
     6–151.4 (0.8–2.4)1.9 (1.1–3.3)a
     ≥16/missing0.6 (0.3–1.1)1.3 (0.7–2.7)
    Census region
     Northeast1.01.0
     Midwest0.7 (0.5–1.2)0.8 (0.5–1.4)
     West1.0 (0.6–1.6)0.8 (0.5–1.5)
     South0.8 (0.5–1.4)0.6 (0.3–1.0)
    Type of health record system used
     Full EHR1.01.0
     Partial EHR0.7 (0.4–1.2)0.9 (0.4–2.0)
     Transitioning from paper to EHR1.2 (0.7–2.1)0.6 (0.3–1.1)
     Paper charts/missing1.1 (0.7–1.7)0.8 (0.4–1.4)
    Patients who are uninsured, %
     0–51.01.0
     6–250.9 (0.6–1.4)1.0 (0.6–1.5)
     ≥26/don’t know/missing0.5 (0.3–1.0)0.6 (0.3–1.1)
    Physician beliefs
    Believes any expert group recommends lung cancer screening
     No1.01.0
     Yes1.7 (1.1–2.9)a1.8 (1.2–2.8)a
    Believes LDCT is effective for
     Never, former, and current smokers (all 3)–8.2 (3.3–20.6)a
     Never, former, or current smokers–6.0 (2.3–15.8)a
     No patients–1.0
    Physician practice style
    Patient volume during a typical week
     ≤751.01.0
     76–1001.7 (1.1–2.7)a1.1 (0.7–1.9)
     101–1251.6 (1.0–2.6)1.0 (0.6–1.8)
     ≥126/missing1.1 (0.7–1.8)1.5 (0.8–3.0)
    Intensity of colorectal cancer screening recommendations
     Low/moderate1.01.0
     High1.0 (0.6–1.4)0.7 (0.5–1.1)
     Unknown1.3 (0.5–3.1)0.9 (0.4–1.8)
    Types of patients for whom physician recommends lung cancer screening
     All, regardless of smoking exposure14.6 (7.0–30.4)a2.1 (1.1–4.0)a
     Any smoking exposure, active or passive4.6 (3.1–6.8)a2.9 (1.7–5.0)a
     Current and/or former smokers only2.4 (1.5–4.0)a2.4 (1.4–4.2)a
     None1.01.0
    Patient influence
    Number of patients who have asked about lung cancer screening in past 12 months
     01.01.0
     1–52.7 (1.8–3.9)a1.8 (1.1–3.0)a
     6–102.9 (1.9–4.6)a2.0 (1.1–3.5)a
     >105.3 (3.2–8.8)a3.2 (1.9–5.6)a
     Unknown1.3 (0.2–8.4)1.7 (0.4–7.4)
    • EHR = electronic health record; LDCT = low-dose spiral computed tomography; OR = odds ratio.

    • Note: Race/ethnicity, geographic location, and medical school affiliation were not included in the models because these measures were not statistically significant in bivariate analyses at P <.10.

    • ↵a Indicate a statistically significant odds ratio.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • The Article in Brief

    Lung Cancer Screening Practices of Primary Care Physicians: Results From a National Survey

    Carrie N. Klabunde , and colleagues

    Background Major expert groups do not recommend screening people without symptoms for lung cancer, including people with heavy or long-term smoking histories, because of a lack of strong evidence. This study examines US primary care physicians' self-reported lung cancer screening practices.

    What This Study Found Primary care physicians in the United States frequently order lung cancer screening tests for asymptomatic patients. In a nationally representative survey of 962 primary care physicians, which used clinical vignettes to assess screening practices, 57 percent of respondents ordered at least one of three lung cancer screening tests (chest radiograph, low-radiation does spiral computed tomography, or sputum cytology) in the past 12 months for patients without symptoms. Thirty-eight percent reported ordering no tests. Physicians were more likely to order screening tests if they believed expert groups recommend lung cancer screening or that screening tests are effective; if they graduated from medical school 20 to 29 years ago; if they would recommend screening for asymptomatic patients, including patients without substantial smoking exposure; and if their patients had asked them about screening.

    Implications

    • To avoid inappropriate ordering, primary care physicians need more information about lung cancer screening's evidence base, guidelines, potential harms, and costs.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 10 (2)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 10 (2)
Vol. 10, Issue 2
March/April 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • The Issue in Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Lung Cancer Screening Practices of Primary Care Physicians: Results From a National Survey
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 8 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Lung Cancer Screening Practices of Primary Care Physicians: Results From a National Survey
Carrie N. Klabunde, Pamela M. Marcus, Paul K. J. Han, Thomas B. Richards, Sally W. Vernon, Gigi Yuan, Gerard A. Silvestri
The Annals of Family Medicine Mar 2012, 10 (2) 102-110; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1340

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Lung Cancer Screening Practices of Primary Care Physicians: Results From a National Survey
Carrie N. Klabunde, Pamela M. Marcus, Paul K. J. Han, Thomas B. Richards, Sally W. Vernon, Gigi Yuan, Gerard A. Silvestri
The Annals of Family Medicine Mar 2012, 10 (2) 102-110; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1340
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Opinions and Practices of Lung Cancer Screening by Physician Specialty
  • Implementation of a lung cancer multidisciplinary team standardised template for reporting to general practitioners: a mixed-method study
  • What affects response rates in primary healthcare-based programmes? An analysis of individual and unit-related factors associated with increased odds of non-response based on HCV screening in the general population in Poland
  • Low-Dose CT Lung Cancer Screening Practices and Attitudes among Primary Care Providers at an Academic Medical Center
  • Moving Beyond the National Lung Screening Trial: Discussing Strategies for Implementation of Lung Cancer Screening Programs
  • In This Issue: Assessing and Acting on Complexity
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Feasibility and Acceptability of the “About Me” Care Card as a Tool for Engaging Older Adults in Conversations About Cognitive Impairment
  • Treatment of Chlamydia and Gonorrhea in Primary Care and Its Patient-Level Variation: An American Family Cohort Study
  • Performance-Based Reimbursement, Illegitimate Tasks, Moral Distress, and Quality Care in Primary Care: A Mediation Model of Longitudinal Data
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Domains of illness & health:
    • Prevention
  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods
  • Other topics:
    • Clinical practice guidelines

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine