Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleMethodology

Association of Patient-Centered Outcomes With Patient-Reported and ICD-9–Based Morbidity Measures

Elizabeth A. Bayliss, Jennifer L. Ellis, Jo Ann Shoup, Chan Zeng, Deanna B. McQuillan and John F. Steiner
The Annals of Family Medicine March 2012, 10 (2) 126-133; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1364
Elizabeth A. Bayliss
MD, MSPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: elizabeth.bayliss@kp.org
Jennifer L. Ellis
MSPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jo Ann Shoup
MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chan Zeng
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Deanna B. McQuillan
MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John F. Steiner
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Participant Characteristics (N = 961)

    Characteristicn%
    Female53055.2
    White race78781.9
    Low socioeconomic status12913.4
    Depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 >4)a34235.6
    Anxiety symptoms (GAD-7 >4)a20120.9
    Any inpatient admissiona20921.8
    Any emergency department visitb22223.1
    Death within 10 months of survey242.5
    Mean No. (SD)Median (5%, 95%)
    Age at survey, y96175.6 (5.7)75 (68, 86)
    Years enrolled before survey96112.4 (4.4)14 (4, 17)
    Self-reported disease count9617.9 (2.7)8 (4, 12.5)
    Self-reported disease burden score96016.8 (10.0)15 (5, 36)
    CCI year before survey9611.9 (1.9)1 (0, 6)
    Inclusion conditionsc9613.6 (0.8)3 (3, 5)
    Outcomes
     General health scored96158.9 (21.4)62 (20, 87)
     Physical component scaled95836.4 (11.4)36 (19, 54)
     Mental component scaled95854.8 (9.0)57 (37, 66)
     Financial constraints scored95877.7 (26.2)92 (25, 100)
     Overwhelmed scored95978.5 (22.4)83 (33, 100)
     General self-efficacy scored95980.7 (16.2)81 (50, 100)
     Inpatient admissionsb (range = 0–7)9610.32 (0.72)0 (0, 2)
     Emergency department visitsb (range=0–14)9610.34 (0.80)0 (0, 2)
     Office visitsb (range = 0–62)9616.20 (4.97)5 (3, 16)
    • CCI = Charlson comorbidity index; PHQ-9 = 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire; GAD-7 = Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale.

    • a Score of >4 indicative of symptoms of each condition.

    • ↵b During the 10 months after the survey.

    • ↵c From original inclusion criteria for cohort of having 3 or more of a list of 10 chronic conditions.

    • ↵d Scored on a range from 1 to 100; higher scores indicate better outcomes (eg, better health, fewer financial constraints, greater self-efficacy).

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Summary of Significant Associations Between Morbidity Measures and Patient-Reported Outcomes

    Patient-Reported Outcomesa
    Morbidity MeasureGeneral Health Status β (CI)bPhysical Well-being β (CI)bEmotional Well-being β (CI)bFewer Financial Constraints Odds Ratio (CI)cLess Overwhelmed Odds Ratio (CI)cSelf-efficacy Odds Ratio (CI)c
    Quan adaptation of CCI (ICD-9)15 (range=0–12)−1.91 (−2.50 to −1.33)d−0.68 (−0.99 to −0.37d0.06 (−0.19 to 0.31)0.82 (0.73 to 0.91)d0.87 (0.78 to 0.96)e0.96 (0.86 to 1.08)
    Self-reported disease burden26 (range=1–89)−0.71 (−0.84 to −0.59)d−0.49 (−0.56 to −0.42)d−0.11 (−0.16 to −.05)d0.96 (0.94 to 0.99)f0.95 (0.93 to 0.97)d0.96 (0.94 to 0.99)f
    Anxiety symptoms (GAD-7)39 (range=0–21)−2.75 (−5.88 to 0.37)1.41 (−0.24 to 3.06)−5.90 (−7.25 to −4.56)d0.64 (0.37 to 1.09)0.57 (0.35 to 0.93)e0.79 (0.48 to 1.31)
    Depressive symptoms (PHQ-9)38 (range=0–27)−12.01 (−14.75 to −9.27)d−4.99 (−6.44 to −3.54)d−5.87 (−7.05 to −4.69)d0.66 (0.39 to 1.13)0.30 (0.18 to 0.50)d0.18 (0.10 to 0.33)d
    • CCI = Charlson comorbidity index; GAD-7 = Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale; ICD- 9=International Classification of Disease, 9th edition; PHQ-9=9-item Patient Health Questionnaire.

    • Note: Associations expressed as point estimates with confidence intervals within separate models for each outcome.

    • ↵a For all outcomes, higher outcome values represent a better state (eg, better physical functioning, fewer financial constraints). All models adjusted for morbidity measures above and age, sex, race, socioeconomic status, and length of enrollment.

    • ↵b Linear regression: β estimates; nonsignificant confidence intervals cross zero.

    • ↵c Logistic regression: odds ratios; nonsignificant confidence intervals cross 1.0.

    • ↵d P value <.001.

    • ↵e P value <.05.

    • ↵f P value <.01.

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Summary of Significant Associations Between Morbidity Measures and Utilization Outcomes

    Utilization Outcomesa
    Morbidity MeasureOutpatient Utilization Negative Binomial Regression Rate Ratio (CI)bInpatient Admission Logistic Regression Odds Ratio (CI)cEmergency Department Admission Logistic Regression Odds Ratio (CI)c
    Quan adaptation of CCI (ICD-9)15 (range=0–12)1.05 (1.02–1.09)d1.17 (1.08–1.26)d1.12 (1.04–1.22)d
    Self-reported disease burden26 (range=1–89)1.02 (1.01–1.02)e1.03 (1.01–1.04)d1.01 (0.99–1.03)f
    Anxiety symptoms (GAD-7)39 (range=0–21)1.23 (1.03–1.47)f1.01 (0.65–1.58)0.94 (0.62–1.43)
    Depressive symptoms (PHQ-9)38 (range=0–27)1.00 (0.86–1.16)0.81 (0.55–1.20)1.72 (1.19–2.49)d
    • CCI = Charlson comorbidity index; GAD-7 = Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale; ICD-9=International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition; PHQ-9=9-item Patient Health Questionnaire.

    • Note: Associations expressed as rate or odds ratios with confidence intervals within separate models for each outcome.

    • ↵a All models adjusted for other morbidity measures and age, sex, race, socioeconomic status, follow-up time, and length of enrollment.

    • ↵b Negative binomial regression; nonsignificant confidence intervals cross 1.0.

    • ↵c Logistic regression; nonsignificant confidence intervals cross 1.0.

    • ↵d P value <.01.

    • ↵e P value <.001.

    • ↵f P value <.05.

Additional Files

  • Tables
  • The Article in Brief

    Association of Patient-Centered Outcomes With Patient-Reported and ICD-9-Based Morbidity Measures

    Elizabeth A. Bayliss , and colleagues

    Background Evaluating patient-centered care for complex patients requires the ability to approriately measure morbidity (illness) for a variety of clinical outcomes. This study compares the contributions of self-reported morbidity and morbidity measured using administrative diagnosis data for both patient-reported outcomes and utilization outcomes.

    What This Study Found A comprehensive assessment of a patient�s morbidity requires both subjective and objective measurement of diseases and disease burden, as well as an assessment of emotional symptoms. Comparing two different approaches to gauging morbidity - (1) objective measurement using ICD-9 diagnosis codes and (2) subjective measurement using patient-reported disease burden and emotional symptoms - researchers conclude both are needed. In data on 961 older adults with three or more medical conditions, morbidity measured by diagnosis code is more strongly associated with higher utilization, whereas self-reported disease burden and emotional symptoms are more strongly associated with patient-reported outcomes.

    Implications

    • Accurate measurement strategies to account for morbidity burden will become increasingly important in developing new methods for evaluating patient-centered care delivery for complex patients.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 10 (2)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 10 (2)
Vol. 10, Issue 2
March/April 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • The Issue in Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Association of Patient-Centered Outcomes With Patient-Reported and ICD-9–Based Morbidity Measures
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
12 + 6 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Association of Patient-Centered Outcomes With Patient-Reported and ICD-9–Based Morbidity Measures
Elizabeth A. Bayliss, Jennifer L. Ellis, Jo Ann Shoup, Chan Zeng, Deanna B. McQuillan, John F. Steiner
The Annals of Family Medicine Mar 2012, 10 (2) 126-133; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1364

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Association of Patient-Centered Outcomes With Patient-Reported and ICD-9–Based Morbidity Measures
Elizabeth A. Bayliss, Jennifer L. Ellis, Jo Ann Shoup, Chan Zeng, Deanna B. McQuillan, John F. Steiner
The Annals of Family Medicine Mar 2012, 10 (2) 126-133; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1364
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Multimorbidity patterns and the relation to self-rated health among older Japanese people: a nationwide cross-sectional study
  • Adverse Events and Economic Burden Among Patients Receiving Systemic Treatment for Mantle Cell Lymphoma: A Real-World Retrospective Cohort Study
  • Association between Continuity of Care and Health-Related Quality of Life
  • Integrating Mental Health In Care For Noncommunicable Diseases: An Imperative For Person-Centered Care
  • Flare frequency, healthcare resource utilisation and costs among patients with gout in a managed care setting: a retrospective medical claims-based analysis
  • Multimorbidity in Patients Attending 2 Australian Primary Care Practices
  • Toward a More Cogent Approach to the Challenges of Multimorbidity
  • In This Issue: Assessing and Acting on Complexity
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Joint Display of Integrated Data Collection for Mixed Methods Research: An Illustration From a Pediatric Oncology Quality Improvement Study
  • Patient-Guided Tours: A Patient-Centered Methodology to Understand Patient Experiences of Health Care
  • Putting Evidence Into Practice: An Update on the US Preventive Services Task Force Methods for Developing Recommendations for Preventive Services
Show more Methodology

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Domains of illness & health:
    • Chronic illness
    • Mental health
  • Person groups:
    • Older adults
  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods
  • Other research types:
    • Health services
  • Core values of primary care:
    • Comprehensiveness
    • Coordination / integration of care
    • Personalized care
  • Other topics:
    • Patient perspectives
    • Multimorbidity

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine