Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Multimedia
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Call for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Multimedia
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Call for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
NewsFamily Medicine UpdatesF

ABFM’S HEART FAILURE SELF-ASSESSMENT MODULE SIMULATION ACTIONS VIS-À-VIS GUIDELINE RECOMMENDATIONS

Michael D. Hagen
The Annals of Family Medicine July 2012, 10 (4) 374-375; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1423
Michael D. Hagen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

The American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM) introduced Maintenance of Certification for Family Physicians (MC-FP) in 2004 in response to policy adopted by the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS.)1 ABFM reported in 2006 the initial Diplomate experiences with MC-FP.2 At that time, ABFM had Self-Assessment Modules (SAMs), consisting of a 60-item knowledge assessment followed by a virtual patient clinical simulation available only for hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, asthma, and depression. Since that time, ABFM has deployed modules for coronary artery disease, chronic heart failure, well child care, maternity care, preventive care, care of the vulnerable elderly, pain management, early childhood illness, cerebrovascular disease, and health behavior. Each of the SAMs includes a Diplomate assessment of both the knowledge assessment and the simulation components.

In addition to the Diplomates’ subjective assessments of the SAMs, ABFM captures the actions taken during each simulation, including the action itself, the simulated date and time of the action, and the simulated patient’s current health state. This information is captured in an action log, which serves as a persistent record of the Diplomate’s traversal through the simulation scenario.

ABFM introduced the chronic heart failure (CHF) SAM and associated simulation in 2006. We present in Figure 1 a graphical summary of simulation actions taken in the CHF SAM, as extracted from the simulation action logs from 2006 to 2011. We present the results as percentage of simulations in which given actions occurred.

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

Chronic heart failure Self-Assessment Module simulations including indicated actions.

ACEInhibitors = angiotensin converting inhibitors; ACEInhibitorsARBS = ACE inhibitors and/or angiotensin receptor blockers; BetaBlockers=beta-adrenergic-blocking agents; DigitalisPrep=digitalis preparations; TSH=thyroid-stimulating hormone.

The results indicate overall high use of angiotensin converting inhibitors (ACEInhibitors), ACE inhibitors and/or angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEInhibitor-sARBS), but surprisingly low use of beta-adrenergic blocking agents (BetaBlockers.) Digitalis preparations (DigitalisPrep) demonstrated very low use. The majority of Diplomates also did a formal assessment of left ventricular function (Echocardiogram.)

The CHF simulations generally present scenarios representing patients with stage C heart failure, as defined in the 2009 ACCF/AHA heart failure guideline.3 According to that guideline, ACE inhibitors and beta-adrenergic blockers should routinely be used in these patients.3 This discrepancy between recommended therapy and the low percentage of beta-adrenergic blocker prescriptions in the simulations suggests that the knowledge assessments should perhaps place greater emphasis on the use of these agents in class C .heart failure. The current CHF knowledge assessment contains only 7 items that reference beta-blockers, and nearly all of these present a beta-adrenergic agent only as historical information in the clinical stem of the item, rather than as a focus of decision-making in the item.

These results suggest that the simulations, although clearly presenting a virtual patient environment, can serve as a useful probe for identifying possible management gaps that should be emphasized in the SAM knowledge assessments.

  • © 2012 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.

References

  1. ↵
    American Board of Medical Specialties. ABMS Maintenance of Certification. 2006 http://www.abms.org/Maintenance_of_Certification/ABMS_MOC.aspx. Accessed Jul 29, 2011.
  2. ↵
    1. Hagen MD,
    2. Ivins D,
    3. Puffer JC,
    4. Rinaldo J,
    5. Roussel GH,
    6. Sumner W,
    7. Xu J
    . Maintenance of certification for family physicians (MC-FP) Self-Assessment Modules (SAMs): the first year. JABFM. 2006;19:398–403.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Jessup M,
    2. et al
    . 2009 focused update: ACCF/AHA guidelines for the diagnosis and management of heart failure in adults. Circulation. 2009;119:1977–2016.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 10 (4)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 10 (4)
Vol. 10, Issue 4
July/August 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
ABFM’S HEART FAILURE SELF-ASSESSMENT MODULE SIMULATION ACTIONS VIS-À-VIS GUIDELINE RECOMMENDATIONS
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
ABFM’S HEART FAILURE SELF-ASSESSMENT MODULE SIMULATION ACTIONS VIS-À-VIS GUIDELINE RECOMMENDATIONS
Michael D. Hagen
The Annals of Family Medicine Jul 2012, 10 (4) 374-375; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1423

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
ABFM’S HEART FAILURE SELF-ASSESSMENT MODULE SIMULATION ACTIONS VIS-À-VIS GUIDELINE RECOMMENDATIONS
Michael D. Hagen
The Annals of Family Medicine Jul 2012, 10 (4) 374-375; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1423
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Core Outcomes of Residency Training 2022 (Provisional)
  • AAFP Issues New Clinical Practice Guideline on Hypertension
  • Family Medicine Advances Transition to Competency-Based Education
Show more Family Medicine Updates

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Past Issues in Brief
  • Multimedia
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Multimedia
  • Supplements
  • Online First
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Media
  • Job Seekers

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2023 Annals of Family Medicine